From: Pollux on 12 Jun 2010 00:28 > Moving through that cycle typically takes him on the order of a month > or more per step. Previous cycles have included proving FLT, proving > P=NP, polynomial-time factoring of large integers, demonstrating flaws > in the ring of algebraic integers, and various combinations and > repetitions of those. But wait! What if he was _right_?? Doesn't that send shivers down your spine? > At various points he has claimed that he was an advanced alien, the > incarnation of Mathematics itself, the only true human, the embodiment > of a godlike power, and various other self-aggrandizing delusions. Excellent! A prime specimen! Do you think he is writing from inside some institution, or he is allowed out in the wild? He is not dangerous, is he?
From: rossum on 12 Jun 2010 07:48 On 12 Jun 2010 04:01:16 GMT, Tim Little <tim(a)little-possums.net> wrote: >Moving through that cycle typically takes him on the order of a month >or more per step. Previous cycles have included proving FLT, proving >P=NP, polynomial-time factoring of large integers, demonstrating flaws >in the ring of algebraic integers, and various combinations and >repetitions of those. Solving the Travelling Salesman problem. rossum
From: Joshua Cranmer on 12 Jun 2010 10:17 On 06/12/2010 07:48 AM, rossum wrote: > On 12 Jun 2010 04:01:16 GMT, Tim Little<tim(a)little-possums.net> > wrote: > >> Moving through that cycle typically takes him on the order of a month >> or more per step. Previous cycles have included proving FLT, proving >> P=NP, polynomial-time factoring of large integers, demonstrating flaws >> in the ring of algebraic integers, and various combinations and >> repetitions of those. > Solving the Travelling Salesman problem. That's the P = NP. And he didn't end up solving Traveling Salesman, he solved metric Traveling Salesman. -- Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not tried it. -- Donald E. Knuth
From: Joshua Cranmer on 12 Jun 2010 10:39 On 06/11/2010 11:39 PM, JSH wrote: > I'm read in about 100 countries. Though only about 40 to 50 countries > every 30 days. And Google is probably read in over 150 countries every day. I suspect they have at least tier-2 internet access, and they probably provide at least some of the world's fiber backbone. Google is definitely not lacking for internet access. > At times people interested in my activities may stress the global > grid. If the web can withstand Youtube traffic, it can withstand any traffic that comes from downloading your stuff. Video traffic is much more bandwidth intensive than any text. I would be surprised if the traffic caused by people interested in your activities surpassed the amount of email traffic in a typical large corporation. -- Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not tried it. -- Donald E. Knuth
From: raycb on 12 Jun 2010 10:48
JSH: >Besides, if I were a god, I wouldn't bother chattering with you >nincompoops. >I'd smite you. LOL. And I have fantasized about being able to do >that. FWIW, scientists have found an area in the upper front temporal lobe that responds to the image of a hand. Wave hello to someone, and that area is triggered. Close by in the left frontal lobe is the motor speech area. I suspect there's a motor area in the right hemisphere that makes you want to hammer your detractors into silence. It seems a lot of JSH posts involve a jumping back and forth from sound frontal lobes to feebler temporal lobes. Not that that's only JSH's problem. One of the most delicate parts of the brain is the hippocampus in the temporal lobes. If a baby suffers learning disabilities due to oxygen deprivation during childbirth, it's mainly due to the death of cells in the hippocampus. This human weakness may play a role in forming our modern world with more information than content. |