JSH: Posting realities, residues result
in [Math]
|
From: Joshua Cranmer on 13 Jun 2010 22:39 On 06/13/2010 10:26 AM, JSH wrote: > My coverage by myself on a yearly basis is 120+ countries to JUST my > math blog alone. And it didn't occur to you I was suggesting just the numbers who read my blog? All I know is that my blog is syndicated on a feed aggregator which is presumably read by a large number of tech enthusiasts. As a result, I couldn't get an accurate number of my visitors just by enabling analytics, since the vast majority of people reading my blog probably don't read my blog from its hosted site. And, probably, that syndication is worth more readers than sci.math, which has an audience of only a few thousand (maybe tens of thousands) at a given time. -- Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not tried it. -- Donald E. Knuth
From: Tim Little on 15 Jun 2010 02:05 On 2010-06-12, Joshua Cranmer <Pidgeot18(a)verizon.invalid> wrote: > I would be surprised if the traffic caused by people interested in > your activities surpassed the amount of email traffic in a typical > large corporation. I would be surprised if it exceeded the email traffic of a small bakery. Especially having received a 4MB PDF brochure by email from such a business. I guess they like having crisp detailed images of the yummy food. - Tim
From: Tim Little on 15 Jun 2010 02:26 On 2010-06-13, Joshua Cranmer <Pidgeot18(a)verizon.invalid> wrote: > I've seen recently that he is adamantly refusing to reason about his > results without using examples. I theorized in the past that this > was an unwillingness to be proven wrong or the lack of an > imaginative mind; perhaps it is an inability to reason (or maybe > metareason fits better here) abstractly. Yes, that would also account for his bizarre assertion that he could "bury" my program with large enough powers of two in his most recent work. Again focussing on the fact that his program works well for very specific contrived examples, while being unable to see why that is not at all useful to his own case, or to anyone doing mathematics for that matter. Finding square roots of n^2 is pretty obviously trivial to anyone else. - Tim
From: dannas on 15 Jun 2010 17:42 "JSH" <jstevh(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:c8271765-e7db-49ab-a1e2-a7e584464231(a)t34g2000prd.googlegroups.com... On Jun 13, 3:18 pm, "Jesse F. Hughes" <je...(a)phiwumbda.org> wrote: > JSH <jst...(a)gmail.com> writes: > > On Jun 13, 1:42 pm, "Jesse F. Hughes" <je...(a)phiwumbda.org> wrote: > >> JSH <jst...(a)gmail.com> writes: <snip red herring> >You people have tossed that at me but it best describes you as you >continue to question Google--as if you're its equal. > >James Harris You pin the success of "your math" on google ratings, which simply proves how desperate you are. If you had something of value the world would have beat a path to your door and made you rich. But you don't, they didn't, and you haven't made one flipping dime. Facts do not lie. Failure is hard to take, so deal with it. You are being properly rewarded for your work.
From: dannas on 15 Jun 2010 17:46
"raycb" <raycb(a)live.com> wrote in message news:faee0c82-c3cc-46d3-a370-93c5af5bde8f(a)z10g2000yqb.googlegroups.com... > JSH: >>Besides, if I were a god, I wouldn't bother chattering with you >>nincompoops. > >>I'd smite you. LOL. And I have fantasized about being able to do >>that. > > FWIW, scientists have found an area in the upper front temporal lobe > that responds to the image of a hand. Wave hello to someone, and that > area is triggered. Close by in the left frontal lobe is the motor > speech area. I suspect there's a motor area in the right hemisphere > that makes you want to hammer your detractors into silence. It seems a > lot of JSH posts involve a jumping back and forth from sound frontal > lobes to feebler temporal lobes. Not that that's only JSH's problem. > One of the most delicate parts of the brain is the hippocampus in the > temporal lobes. If a baby suffers learning disabilities due to oxygen > deprivation during childbirth, it's mainly due to the death of cells > in the hippocampus. This human weakness may play a role in forming our > modern world with more information than content. I don't think his mama tried to suffocate him at birth, if she, or his dad, did that could explain quite a lot. It might have been the Doctor, or even the nurse, or a nurses aid. Perhaps a Priest or Rabbi..... |