Prev: Programming Java 3D API Book Recommendation
Next: Apache Tomcat https link goes down but http works
From: markspace on 28 Jul 2010 20:52 Lew wrote: > Arne Vajhøj wrote: >>> Why would: >>> Apache HTTPD with mod_rewrite -> Apache Tomcat >>> not work? > .... > > markspace wrote: >> What if Apache isn't your web server? > > In general a good question. In the OP's particular case it's pretty > clear they're in control of the environment and can choose it to be. > Seems like a good way to get bit if you ever export the web app to a different environment. Sure, Apache is very popular and you can just spec the app that way to customers, but it's also just one more thing to deal with manually (the mod_rewrite stuff) that doesn't need to be, I suppose.
From: Arne Vajhøj on 28 Jul 2010 21:10 On 28-07-2010 20:43, markspace wrote: > Arne Vajh�j wrote: >> Why would: >> Apache HTTPD with mod_rewrite -> Apache Tomcat >> not work? > > Did you try it? Did it work? I'm honestly interested to know, it never > occurred to me that it might work. I have not tried it, but I would expect it to work. If used with PHP it is: ---(original request)-->mod_rewrite--(modified request)-->mod_php---->PHP scipt With Tomcat it should be: ---(original request)-->mod_rewrite--(modified request)-->mod_jk--(AJP protocol)-->Tomcat Given the functionality of mod_rewrite it must be executed before the real mod's and be rather independent of what those mod's do. At least that is my expectation. >> I don't think that provides nearly as much functionality as mod_rewrite >> when it comes to smart rewrites. > > What if Apache isn't your web server? The using an Apache module like mod_rewrite is obviously not an option. Arne
From: Lew on 29 Jul 2010 00:51 markspace wrote: >>> What if Apache isn't your web server? Lew wrote: >> In general a good question. In the OP's particular case it's pretty >> clear they're in control of the environment and can choose it to be. markspace wrote: > Seems like a good way to get bit if you ever export the web app to a > different environment. Sure, Apache is very popular and you can just > spec the app that way to customers, but it's also just one more thing to > deal with manually (the mod_rewrite stuff) that doesn't need to be, I > suppose. It is not uncommon to spec requirements for an app to run. And some kinds of portability are overrated. I'm not necessarily speaking in favor of mod_rewrite, but I do think httpd is an awesome product and one should not be ashamed or fearful of basing an application on it. And there are hundreds of products on the market that already spec it as part of their product. Ever hear of LAMP? -- Lew
From: Tom Anderson on 29 Jul 2010 09:27 On Wed, 28 Jul 2010, markspace wrote: > Also, use the fact that WEB-INF is private to hide JSPs and servlets > that you don't want the user calling directly. > > Web Pages \ > index.jsp > other-public.jsp > WEB-INF \ > private.jsp > myplugin \ > plugin.jsp > etc. > css \ > public.css > images \ > public.jpg > > Etc. Nice trick! I didn't know that one. You could hide config files and so on like this too. tom -- The art of medicine consists in amusing the patient while nature cures the disease. -- Voltaire
From: Tom Anderson on 29 Jul 2010 09:57
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010, pmz wrote: > I'd like to have ONE default JSP page (which obviously contains a > webpage main layout - styles, scripts, tables, images, etc.). In few > places I have some dynamical stuff (such as parameter-regarded menu > display or also parameter-regarded body display). > > Shall I use you <c:choose/> method for further inclusion of required > jsp-sub-pages? No. You're doing this all wrong. Or rather, you're doing it all PHP, which in JSP means wrong. Use separate pages for the different pages, and a tag file to define the common structure: http://www.oracle.com/technology/sample_code/tutorials/jsp20/tagfiles.html A tag file is the analog of a framework method in code; it can write a load of HTML, but can also invoke fragments passed by the original invoker. For example, given a tag file like this (call it main.tag): <%@ attribute name="content" required="true" fragment="true" %> <html> <body> <h1>PMZ's SUPER SITE</h1> <jsp:invoke fragment="content"/> </body> </html> You could write a JSP like this: <%@ taglib prefix="mytags" tagdir="/WEB-INF/tags" %> <mytags:main> <jsp:attribute name="content"> <p>Some content.</p> </jsp:attribute> </mytags:main> This would invoke the main.tag to build the page structure, which would then call down to the fragment defined in the JSP. You can have multiple fragments, and also use normal content of the tag via <jsp:doBody/>. tom -- The art of medicine consists in amusing the patient while nature cures the disease. -- Voltaire |