Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: T Wake on 26 Nov 2006 09:56 <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message news:ekc3qu$8ss_007(a)s963.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... > In article <MPG.1fd256edc2f9f8a9989c95(a)news.individual.net>, > krw <krw(a)att.bizzzz> wrote: >>In article <4567FF01.3954B6E4(a)hotmail.com>, >>rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com says... >>> >>> >>> krw wrote: >>> >>> > rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com says... >>> > > krw wrote: >>> > > > rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com says... >>> > > > > krw wrote: >>> > > > > > lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net says... >>> > > > > > > "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote in message >>> > > > > > > > <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message >>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > >> Once again, I'll ask you to think about administering >>> > > > > > > >> your >>> > > > > > > >> NHS to all of Europe. That is how the US has to work. >>> > > > > > > >> We essentially 50 countries, each has its own politics, > economy >>> > > > > > > >> and different priority lists. >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > It is a shame you have such a low opinion of the American > people. >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > It's also quite a shame that she has such a lack of > understanding of the US >>> > > > > > > Constitution, to think that no national program is possible. > There are >>> > > > > > > plenty of national programs in the US, and they work fine. >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > All (not operated through the states) are unconstitutional, as >>> > > > > > well. None come close to 17% of the GNP either, though you'd >>> > > > > > likely be all for nationalizing the oil companies too. >>> > > > > >>> > > > > What would be the point of that ? >>> > > > >>> > > > It makes as much sense as nationalizing health care; none. Why >>> > > > don't you nationalize food production while you're at it? >>> > > >>> > > Who said anything about nationalisation ? >>> > >>> > What exactly do you think *NATIONALIZED* Health Care is? >>> > >>> > Dumb donkey! >>> >>> The NHS *does not* nationalise all health care. >>> >>> Private practice continues and GPs run their own practices essentially >>> as > they like. They >>> simply receive a salary from the NHS. >> >>If they receive a salary from the NHS, their practices *have* been >>nationalized. They're no longer in control of their business. >>Sheesh! >> > There is something more important here. He cannot conceive > of a medical distriubtion system that isn't completely > controlled by the national government. This means that > he doesn't require chocies and is willing to allow a few > politicians make all this decisions for him. This means > that when his politicians do screw him, he has no means > to save himself. Blimey, how many assumptions do you want to make and then pass off as if they are correct and factual? Not only are your basic assumptions incorrect but you then go and draw incorrect conclusions from them. Amazing really.
From: T Wake on 26 Nov 2006 09:58 "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message news:456997F0.42E75573(a)hotmail.com... > > > T Wake wrote: > >> "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote >> > T Wake wrote: >> >> "Phineas T Puddleduck" <phineaspuddleduck(a)googlemail.com> wrote >> >> > >> >> > (quick rule of thumb - Unsettled is an idiot) >> >> >> >> A massive understatement. Unsettled registers 5.8 Porats on the idiocy >> >> scale. >> > >> > Borats surely ? >> >> Sorry it was a bit on an "In joke" about the posts Y.Porat makes in >> news://sci.physics. Basically he is illiterate and woefully uneducated >> and >> convinced that photons have mass. Any one who disagrees is called a >> "Nazi" >> (or more often than not a Nasi, Nsai or Nzai) and subjected to a tirade >> of >> (badly spelt) insults. > > I'll have to take a peek then ! It can be worth it. Porat really has a hard on for one of the posters called Eric Gisse and tends to follow him round threads posting line after line of spittle soaked vitriol.
From: T Wake on 26 Nov 2006 10:01 "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message news:45699AA2.AEC7C21E(a)hotmail.com... > > > T Wake wrote: > >> "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote >> > krw wrote: >> >> usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com says... >> >> > "Phineas T Puddleduck" <phineaspuddleduck(a)googlemail.com> wrote >> >> > > >> >> > > I'm left of centre myself. I can see the need for the state to >> >> > > keep >> >> > > checks and balances, but human nature sometimes really makes me >> >> > > cry! >> >> > >> >> > Prior to getting embroiled in this thread, I thought I was fairly >> >> > right >> >> > of centre. I now see the error in my ways and I am firmly left of >> >> > centre >> >> > now. I suspect half the apparently right wing extremists posting on >> >> > this >> >> > thread live very different lives away from USENET. >> >> >> >> No, you're a left-wing extremist, >> > >> > Oh right. The left-wing extemist former soldier ! >> >> It is quite funny. But some of the rightwing cranks posting to this >> thread >> have no argument so have to resort to insults and try to score points. >> >> >> right there with the dumb donkey. >> >> This isn't surprising since you're both socialist Europeons. >> > >> > LMAO ! >> > >> > I've only once ever voted Labour and that was at a local election for a >> > councillor whose opinions I respected. >> >> Tories are probably more socialist than labour now :-) > > I wonder what'll happen when all their old farts finally die off ? I suspect in five or six generations, people will look back at how "we[tinw]" view the political alliances of the parties with amazement.
From: Phineas T Puddleduck on 26 Nov 2006 10:04 In article <ekc8bc$8qk_002(a)s963.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com>, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > In article <phineaspuddleduck-B8D548.13474726112006(a)free.teranews.com>, > Phineas T Puddleduck <phineaspuddleduck(a)googlemail.com> wrote: > >In article <ekc2ot$8ss_004(a)s963.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com>, > > jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > > > >> >Just plonk the duck. He's never come close to write anything worth > >> >reading. > >> > >> I'm already ignoring two: one because of posting repititious > >> drivel and the other by his request. Every once in a while > >> somebody does chime in with an interesting post. > > > >KRW said this has he is feeling overwhelmed. Unfortunately he has > >misunderstood the idea of a public USENET. > > Oh, my. My, my, my, my. YOu really should figure out whom > you are talking about before you pull outrageous boners like > this one. What do you mean. krw warne dyou to plonk me. Flu playing with your head? > > > Plus with the Animal Farm > >reference going completely over his head as well.... > > ARe you talking about denizens of this thread? Earlier post - four legs good, two legs bad. -- Just \int_0^\infty du it! -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
From: Phineas T Puddleduck on 26 Nov 2006 10:07
In article <ekc910$8qk_004(a)s963.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com>, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > But only your upper, upper class are allowed to use those > services. How long do you think it will take some socialist > to use that as a class warfare tool? YOu've already decimated > your wealthy class by bankrupting them through death taxes. No one is denied access to private medicine, they just have to pay for it. Are you now saying YOUR healthcare system is a class warfare tool? -- Just \int_0^\infty du it! -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |