Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: Phineas T Puddleduck on 26 Nov 2006 09:19 In article <3NKdnbYUQuN3AvTYnZ2dnUVZ8sWdnZ2d(a)pipex.net>, "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: > > > > 93 authors, 10334 replies. I would have been happy if such long > > discussion had taken place on topic like 'what was before big bang'. > > Sorry, I didnt realise you were forced to read this thread. Perhaps he took the wrong pill? -- Just \int_0^\infty du it! -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
From: jmfbahciv on 26 Nov 2006 09:14 In article <456856D8.D3AFF55F(a)hotmail.com>, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> kensmith(a)green.rahul.net (Ken Smith) wrote: >> > <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote: >> >> kensmith(a)green.rahul.net (Ken Smith) wrote: >> > >> >>>The money spent on paying people to push needless paper >> >> >> >>The paper is needed. >> > >> >No, *some* paper may be needed. >> >> You are not understanding what I'm talking about. Each piece of >> paper was created to solve a problem. Each step and check of that >> step was created to solve a problem. All processes, bit flows, >> work flows, and knowledge flows change over time. Most of >> processes that change require a piece of paper to make sure >> the step was accomplished. Over time, the reason for some >> these steps may disappear. However, the step and its paper >> will never disappear until somebody vigourously weeds it out. > >Over here my GP now types his notes straight into a PC. No paper is needed. Oh, good grief. Editing direction: For all instances of the word paper, insert virtual in front of it. /BAH
From: Eeyore on 26 Nov 2006 09:20 John Fields wrote: > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >"Michael A. Terrell" wrote: > >> Don Bowey wrote: > >> > > >> > Oregon has it's own medical plan. > >> > >> And a fine job they do, letting their mental patients run free to > >> make threatening phone calls to people. One has lost multiple ISP > >> accounts for threatening people online, been bared from the local > >> Wal-Mart, and arrested for trying to run over someone, as well. > > > >Under the NHS he would be 'sectioned'. > > --- > From: > > http://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/sectioned > > sec�tion (skshn) > n. > 1. A cut or division. > 2. The act or process of separating or cutting, especially the > surgical cutting or dividing of tissue. > 3. A thin slice, as of tissue, suitable for microscopic examination. > > v. > 1. To separate or divide into parts. > 2. To cut or divide tissue surgically. > > And you think the US is crude??? > > -- > JF IDIOT.
From: Phineas T Puddleduck on 26 Nov 2006 09:20 In article <dr7jm2lenu7mdhs8neauij8fngiviq0vlg(a)4ax.com>, John Fields <jfields(a)austininstruments.com> wrote: > On Sun, 26 Nov 2006 02:34:45 +0000, Eeyore > <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > >unsettled wrote: > > > >> Phineas T Puddleduck wrote: > >> > krw <krw(a)att.bizzzz> wrote: > >> > > >> >>What's the matter? You have to stoop to snip-forging? You are > >> >>areal piece of work. I think that's enough of you! > >> > > >> > > >> > Thats pretty rich coming from a poster who has to try hard to be > >> > noticeable, let alone interesting. It seems the quality of political > >> > debate in the UK is far more mature as we grew out of calling people > >> > "leftist" or "rightist" as insults quite a while ago. > >> > >> Yes indeed, and grew cruder in the process. > > > >The USA has taken crudity to an entirely new level. > > --- > Yes, now we even _talk_ to Brits. > Nah, you don't wanna do that. Stone the crows, leave it out Guv! -- Just \int_0^\infty du it! -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
From: John Fields on 26 Nov 2006 09:23
On Sun, 26 Nov 2006 02:51:40 +0000, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >Is the USA economy a *comtrolled economy* ? --- Comptrolled? It was until you took Greenspan off our hands. -- JF |