From: Phineas T Puddleduck on
In article <ekc99l$8qk_005(a)s963.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com>,
jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote:

> >Thatcher was quite mad.
>
> I saw no evidence of madness in her book about her years in Downing
> Street.
>
>

Poll Tax



> >
> >She reckoned you could run a country like a small high street shop. She
> fancied
> >herself as royalty of a type too. Quite barking mad, like an eccentric aunt
> >perhaps.
>
> This is your conclusion because she stopped obeying union leaders
> who were Communists and had a clear agenda of instilling this
> political theory in all corners of your country?

If you are on about the overpowerment of the Unions in the Uk in the
1970's, there is a shed load more to it then your (yet again) simplistic
blanket generalisations...

--

Just \int_0^\infty du it!

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

From: T Wake on

"Phineas T Puddleduck" <phineaspuddleduck(a)googlemail.com> wrote in message
news:phineaspuddleduck-518B5A.13562126112006(a)free.teranews.com...
> In article <ydWdnRXxfrDqB_TYnZ2dnUVZ8tidnZ2d(a)pipex.net>,
> "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote:
>
>> Sadly, the time was ideal for her to prosper and then by a miracle enough
>> people seem to have a blinkered opinion of the period that the other
>> "bad"
>> things seem to have been brushed over.
>>
>> Her economic policies caused all manner of turmoil and took the best part
>> of
>> a decade to ty and rectify, yet now people seem to have some weird
>> flashback
>> about how great things were.
>
> I remember the miners strikes vividly due to the utter turmoil they
> caused in the communities here.

Same here. It was not a good time and it was not a good example of how
democracy works (on either side).


From: Phineas T Puddleduck on
In article <BpWdnSzp7ersM_TYnZ2dnUVZ8smdnZ2d(a)pipex.net>,
"T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote:

>
> "Phineas T Puddleduck" <phineaspuddleduck(a)googlemail.com> wrote in message
> news:phineaspuddleduck-518B5A.13562126112006(a)free.teranews.com...
> > In article <ydWdnRXxfrDqB_TYnZ2dnUVZ8tidnZ2d(a)pipex.net>,
> > "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Sadly, the time was ideal for her to prosper and then by a miracle enough
> >> people seem to have a blinkered opinion of the period that the other
> >> "bad"
> >> things seem to have been brushed over.
> >>
> >> Her economic policies caused all manner of turmoil and took the best part
> >> of
> >> a decade to ty and rectify, yet now people seem to have some weird
> >> flashback
> >> about how great things were.
> >
> > I remember the miners strikes vividly due to the utter turmoil they
> > caused in the communities here.
>
> Same here. It was not a good time and it was not a good example of how
> democracy works (on either side).

For me one of the darker aspects of it was the increasing use of the
police as a political weapon. Miners movements were being restricted,
and aid had to be sent to those families fighting for their very
existence.

It is telling that there are very few Tories these days who crow for a
return to hardline Thatcherism. It surprises me still that we did not
springboard into a hard-left government directly after, and ended up
with a left (in name only) one.

--

Just \int_0^\infty du it!

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

From: T Wake on

"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4569A1EA.3CE15088(a)hotmail.com...
>
>
> T Wake wrote:
>
>> "neo" <MATREEX(a)gmail.com> wrote
>> >
>> > This thread is closed.
>>
>> Really, thanks for letting me know.
>
> I declare this thread open for business.

Brilliant. Thanks, we can post again now.


From: John Fields on
On Sun, 26 Nov 2006 12:55:34 +0000, Eeyore
<rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>
>John Fields wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 25 Nov 2006 17:59:03 -0500, Jamie
>> <jamie_ka1lpa_not_valid_after_ka1lpa_(a)charter.net> wrote:
>>
>> >John Fields wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Thu, 23 Nov 2006 04:05:38 +0000, Eeyore
>> >> <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>>
>> >>>unsettled wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>>Our post offices are also open till 5PM in most places.
>> >>>
>> >>>Is that supposed to be some kind of special US achievement ? Ours stay open later
>> >>>than that !
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> ---
>> >> That's because they're so inefficient they have to.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >:)) good one!
>>
>> ---
>> :-)
>>
>> --
>> JF
>
>IDIOT

---
So, I've reduced you down to your essence; a sad creature with a
vocabulary of one word. Works for me!!!


--
JF