Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: Jamie on 3 Dec 2006 18:50 Eeyore wrote: > > Jamie wrote: > > >>Eeyore wrote: >> >>>Jamie wrote: >>> >>>>Eeyore wrote: >>>> >>>>>Ken Smith wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>The so called "war on terror" has cost the US a great deal without really >>>>>>yelding anything much as a result. >>>>> >>>>>You're kidding. >>>>> >>>>>It's yielded greater instability in the word and more hatred of the USA ( >>>>>entirely justified this time ). >>>>> >>>>>What sheer brilliance. >>>>> >>>>>Graham >>>>> >>>> >>>>It would be a blessing if you would talk about something >>>>that you really know! that way, we wouldn't see much >>>>of you and give the rest a break! >>>> >>>> Just my comments from the peanut gallery.. >>> >>> >>>Perhaps you could explain how it's increased world stability and made the USA >>>more popular in that case ? >>> >>>Graham >> >> I don't pretend to be an expert on such matters. I also know that >>you are far more clue less about the affairs of the United States than you >>want to admit. > > > Perhaps you'd like to illuminate my thinking in that case ? > > You could usefully start with the above issue. > > > >> It seems you spend most of your time ridiculing us, when you should >> be looking in your own back yard. > > > Do please say what you really mean ! Why do you feel the need to hint at some > alleged shortcomings ? Come out and say it ! What is your point ? > > Graham > I find it's best to hint those that need a little help in the right direction instead of publicly humiliating them. Looks like i may have hit a tender spot? Do you have skeletons in your closet? Btw, if any information you may need to fuel your debate isn't available publicly, why do you think i'm going to give you something to work with ? Maybe there is a reason why you can't find that needle in the hay stack? -- "I'm never wrong, once i thought i was, but was mistaken" Real Programmers Do things like this. http://webpages.charter.net/jamie_5
From: Eeyore on 3 Dec 2006 19:22 Jamie wrote: > Eeyore wrote: > > Jamie wrote: > >>Eeyore wrote: > >>>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >>>> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>>I like reading math books. > >>>>> > >>>>>No that bothered about maths. I took an added interest when Mathcad came out > >>>>>since it was possible to put maths to some real use but I only need that > >>>>>occasionally. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>Haven't done that for a while because I've been trying to > >>>>>>learn all this people-stuff. > >>>>> > >>>>>Very different isn't it ? Not so neat and tidy for one thing ! > >>>> > >>>>None of it ever makes sense. Whenever some crank posts in s.p. > >>>>about his theory of everything, I ask if it explains men. It > >>>>never does. > >>> > >>>sci.physics isn't much about physics at all but rather the poor state of US > >>>education. > >>> > >>>Graham > >> > >>you're treading on thin ice! > > > > > > I'm not referring to the real physicists of course but the likes of 'Aristotle > > Plutonium' or whatever he calls himself. > > > > Ok I just remembered his stupid real nym but he might as well be called Archibald > > Pustule. > > > > Graham > > > Please pick one. so i can relate to your ramblings. > Nym may refer to: > > * The New York Mets > * -onym, an English affix > * Nym server, a pseudonym server which provides untraceable email > addresses > * Nym, an alien character in Star Wars > * The Nym, a race of giant sentient plants in The Wheel of Time > fantasy book series > * An 'alien' species in the television series Surface > * Nym, a minor figure in Shakespeare's play The Merry Wives of Windsor > * Nym, a character from the Forgotten Realms setting of Dungeons & > Dragons > * Nym, a Corporal in Shakespeare's play Henry V I do believe the one you're looking for is " pseudonym " as if you didn't know that already ! Graham
From: Eeyore on 3 Dec 2006 19:24 Jamie wrote: > Eeyore wrote: > > Jamie wrote: > >>Eeyore wrote: > >>>Jamie wrote: > >>>>Eeyore wrote: > >>>>>Ken Smith wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>>The so called "war on terror" has cost the US a great deal without really > >>>>>>yelding anything much as a result. > >>>>> > >>>>>You're kidding. > >>>>> > >>>>>It's yielded greater instability in the word and more hatred of the USA ( > >>>>>entirely justified this time ). > >>>>> > >>>>>What sheer brilliance. > >>>>> > >>>>>Graham > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>>It would be a blessing if you would talk about something > >>>>that you really know! that way, we wouldn't see much > >>>>of you and give the rest a break! > >>>> > >>>> Just my comments from the peanut gallery.. > >>> > >>> > >>>Perhaps you could explain how it's increased world stability and made the USA > >>>more popular in that case ? > >>> > >>>Graham > >> > >> I don't pretend to be an expert on such matters. I also know that > >>you are far more clue less about the affairs of the United States than you > >>want to admit. > > > > > > Perhaps you'd like to illuminate my thinking in that case ? > > > > You could usefully start with the above issue. > > > > > > > >> It seems you spend most of your time ridiculing us, when you should > >> be looking in your own back yard. > > > > > > Do please say what you really mean ! Why do you feel the need to hint at some > > alleged shortcomings ? Come out and say it ! What is your point ? > > > > Graham > > > I find it's best to hint those that need a little help in the right > direction instead of publicly humiliating them. > > Looks like i may have hit a tender spot? Do you have skeletons in > your closet? > > Btw, if any information you may need to fuel your debate isn't > available publicly, why do you think i'm going to give you something > to work with ? Maybe there is a reason why you can't find that needle > in the hay stack? It's too tricky for you to state what you mean ? Graham
From: Michael A. Terrell on 3 Dec 2006 22:52 Ken Smith wrote: > > In article <45721411.A104DB7(a)earthlink.net>, > Michael A. Terrell <mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote: > >Ken Smith wrote: > [....] > >> Why should I? That would be perhaps helping the other side on the NHS > >> debate. If they can't argue that one with out leaving a route to the NHS > >> in their own logic, they will be in big trouble. > > > > > > To prove your self? > > I don't need to do that. > > > To add validity to your hair brained attitude > >about the FCC? > > I have no "hair brained attitude" about the FCC so no validity needs > adding. > > > To prove that you are a man? > > How exactly will any of this indicate my gender? You are just being silly > now. > > > Many other reasons, but > >you'll blow them all off, as usual. > > No, I'm straight. > > -- > -- > kensmith(a)rahul.net forging knowledge Whatever you say. -- Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to prove it. Member of DAV #85. Michael A. Terrell Central Florida
From: jmfbahciv on 4 Dec 2006 06:18
In article <45731B0C.7DCA6173(a)hotmail.com>, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >> > >> >> There are people who like to think. That's one way to do so. >> > >> >There's plenty of others more useful and rewarding. >> >> Not if you enjoy coding, debugging, and making the iron >> run through your hoops. > >I'm used to doing that too. > >Assembler isn't the only way you know. Ah, but with assembler, you know exactly what you get to tell the machine exactly what to do. With HLLs, somebody else's code interprets yours and then they get to tell the machine what you may have written. /BAH |