Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: Ken Smith on 3 Jan 2007 23:10 In article <d6160$459c33db$4fe7356$31499(a)DIALUPUSA.NET>, unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote: >T Wake wrote: > >> "unsettled" <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote in message >> news:35670$459c2e53$4fe7356$31413(a)DIALUPUSA.NET... >> >>>T Wake wrote: >>> >>> >>>>"unsettled" <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote in message >>>>news:de4d6$459c1096$4fe756c$30741(a)DIALUPUSA.NET... >>>> >>>> >>>>>T Wake wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>><jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message >>>>>>news:engg2h$8qk_004(a)s827.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>In article <enbata$6p7$2(a)blue.rahul.net>, >>>>>>>kensmith(a)green.rahul.net (Ken Smith) wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>In article <enb17e$8qk_002(a)s957.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com>, >>>>>>>><jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>In article <en90n9$5un$4(a)blue.rahul.net>, >>>>>>>>>kensmith(a)green.rahul.net (Ken Smith) wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>In article <em3gds$8qk_001(a)s969.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com>, >>>>>>>>>><jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>[....] >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>You should care. It is the very things that have made the US a free >>>>>>>>>>country that are being lost. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>I see. You cannot list those who are denied their US Constituional >>>>>>>>>rights. Perhaps those who are being monitored under this law >>>>>>>>>are those who have no Constitutional rights? IOW, they are not >>>>>>>>>of this country but are an enemy of this country. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>I listed one that should matter to you. You BAH have been denied your >>>>>>>>Constitutional rights. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>No, I haven't. It is only your opinion that I have, but you are >>>>>>>wrong. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Bush has made the claim that he can listen to your >>>>>>>>phone calls. In your opinion, perhaps you don't deserve these rights. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>He can listen using the procedures described in the Patriot Act >>>>>>>if, and only if, I cause attraction to myself by talking about >>>>>>>procurement and disbrusement of mess-making subjects. So I don't >>>>>>>do that. I also haven't said the word bomb in an airport since >>>>>>>1975 or so. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Has my Constitutional rights been taken away because it is no >>>>>>>longer a prudent thing to say the word bomb when I'm going >>>>>>>through security? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Use your noodle. >>>>> >>>>>>But you have used it in an USENET post now, so I assume from this point >>>>>>forward all your electronic comms are monitored. >>>>> >>>>>Of that I have no doubt. Everything usenet is international and >>>>>public with *no* expectation of privacy. This is just like >>>>>the bugged parking meters. Many of have assumed for years that >>>>>usenet is scanned for such key words. I've seen all sorts of >>>>>attention seeking posts using dozens of suspect expressions >>>>>like anthrax, bomb, suitcase bomb, hijacking, concealed weapons, >>>>>and the like. >>>>> >>>>>There, think that got someone's attention? >>>>> >>>>>I sure hope so! Otherwise the boys are asleep at the switch. >>>> >>>> >>>>And there is no way of knowing if they are. >>> >>>Make it look real. >>> >>>Unfortunately that possible cost is a bit too dear for my taste. >>> >> >> >> Same here. Detention without a lawyer is not something I want to undergo >> just to validate the security service :-) > > >Psssst. Let's bribe an Arab. ;-) Everybody run. The home coming queen has a gun. -- -- kensmith(a)rahul.net forging knowledge
From: Ken Smith on 3 Jan 2007 23:17 In article <engkr4$8ss_002(a)s893.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com>, <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote: >In article <1167690380.376386.38920(a)h40g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>, > "Winfield Hill" <hill(a)rowland.org> wrote: >> >>Ben Newsam wrote: >>> >>> Bollocks! <vbg> >> >> That did it, we're over 12,500 posts! > >Now I'm curious. Why is 12,500 an interesting number? There is no such thing as an uninteresting number. 12,500 * 8 = -- -- kensmith(a)rahul.net forging knowledge
From: JoeBloe on 4 Jan 2007 06:58 On Wed, 03 Jan 07 11:55:22 GMT, lparker(a)emory.edu (Lloyd Parker) Gave us: >No, it says the president can designate anyone, anytime, anywhere as an enemy >combatant, and gives the person no way to challenge that. In time of war, it has always been that way, dumbass. He can also declare marshall law, and beat down every door in the country in a search too.
From: JoeBloe on 4 Jan 2007 07:04 On Wed, 03 Jan 07 16:13:34 GMT, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com Gave us: > I've had to redo my data base of >posts read every time s.p. goes over the number of one million. YOUR database is local to YOUR computer, so it could be a limit with your software new client app.
From: JoeBloe on 4 Jan 2007 07:07
On Wed, 03 Jan 07 16:15:32 GMT, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com Gave us: >In article <1167690380.376386.38920(a)h40g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>, > "Winfield Hill" <hill(a)rowland.org> wrote: >> >>Ben Newsam wrote: >>> >>> Bollocks! <vbg> >> >> That did it, we're over 12,500 posts! > >Now I'm curious. Why is 12,500 an interesting number? > He had just made a previous post where he said something like how it wouldn't be long before it popped over that half k mile marker. Then the respondent to him obliged. He was elated! :-] Doesn't take much more than a 12.5 k off topic post count to excite folks around here. |