Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: jmfbahciv on 5 Jan 2007 08:49 In article <459DC24E.2A4AD092(a)hotmail.com>, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> When you use your wireless telephone, >> do you believe that conversation is a private communication? > >Once upon a time I never expected to be listened to by spies whether real or >electronic. That's for sure. > Then you had a serious reality filter. The Cold War mythologies were all about spies and electronics and stuff. The US embassy in Russia couldn't be used because of all the bugs. Hollywood movies are filled with people talking in the bathroom with the water running. Little girls learn all about how sound carries. /BAH
From: Eeyore on 5 Jan 2007 10:13 jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > > > >> When you use your wireless telephone, > >> do you believe that conversation is a private communication? > > > >Once upon a time I never expected to be listened to by spies whether real or > >electronic. That's for sure. > > Then you had a serious reality filter. The Cold War mythologies were > all about spies and electronics and stuff. The US embassy in Russia > couldn't be used because of all the bugs. Hollywood movies are > filled with people talking in the bathroom with the water running. > Little girls learn all about how sound carries. I don't live in the US embassy and Hollywood is about fantasy. It is however pretty clear to me that a former g/f of mine had her land line tapped for being active in CND. It was hilariously obvious. Graham
From: jmfbahciv on 5 Jan 2007 10:18 In article <459E6B0F.D4DB32BA(a)hotmail.com>, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >> > >> >> When you use your wireless telephone, >> >> do you believe that conversation is a private communication? >> > >> >Once upon a time I never expected to be listened to by spies whether real or >> >electronic. That's for sure. >> >> Then you had a serious reality filter. The Cold War mythologies were >> all about spies and electronics and stuff. The US embassy in Russia >> couldn't be used because of all the bugs. Hollywood movies are >> filled with people talking in the bathroom with the water running. >> Little girls learn all about how sound carries. > >I don't live in the US embassy and Hollywood is about fantasy. A lot of times Hollywood does take instances in real life and then embellish it. The point is that I'd like to know when anybody actually had expectations that words uttered would never be overheard; everybody, especially those who like to gossip know how to take privacy precautions. Now childish notion is that all transmissions in the EMF range are private? > >It is however pretty clear to me that a former g/f of mine had her land line >tapped for being active in CND. It was hilariously obvious. So you've already realized that privacy does not include landlines. Why do you think it is going to include broadcasts over thru the air? I don't understand this logic. /BAH
From: Eeyore on 5 Jan 2007 11:44 jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >> >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> > > >> >> When you use your wireless telephone, > >> >> do you believe that conversation is a private communication? > >> > > >> >Once upon a time I never expected to be listened to by spies whether real > >> >or electronic. That's for sure. > >> > >> Then you had a serious reality filter. The Cold War mythologies were > >> all about spies and electronics and stuff. The US embassy in Russia > >> couldn't be used because of all the bugs. Hollywood movies are > >> filled with people talking in the bathroom with the water running. > >> Little girls learn all about how sound carries. > > > >I don't live in the US embassy and Hollywood is about fantasy. > > A lot of times Hollywood does take instances in real life and > then embellish it. Mostly so in fact. > The point is that I'd like to know when > anybody actually had expectations that words uttered would > never be overheard; everybody, especially those who like to > gossip know how to take privacy precautions. Now childish > notion is that all transmissions in the EMF range are private? > > > >It is however pretty clear to me that a former g/f of mine had her land line > >tapped for being active in CND. It was hilariously obvious. > > So you've already realized that privacy does not include landlines. > Why do you think it is going to include broadcasts over thru the air? > > I don't understand this logic. That tap would have needed a warrant though. Graham
From: Lloyd Parker on 5 Jan 2007 07:04
In article <enll0p$8qk_003(a)s965.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com>, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >In article <459DC24E.2A4AD092(a)hotmail.com>, > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> >>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >> >>> When you use your wireless telephone, >>> do you believe that conversation is a private communication? >> >>Once upon a time I never expected to be listened to by spies whether real or >>electronic. That's for sure. >> > >Then you had a serious reality filter. The Cold War mythologies were >all about spies and electronics and stuff. The US embassy in Russia >couldn't be used because of all the bugs. Hollywood movies are >filled with people talking in the bathroom with the water running. >Little girls learn all about how sound carries. > > >/BAH How do you like Bush asserting he's got the right to open and read first-class mail? |