Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: jmfbahciv on 5 Oct 2006 06:56 In article <VAVUg.13310$7I1.3298(a)newssvr27.news.prodigy.net>, <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: > >"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message >news:452415BE.DB0DBC1E(a)hotmail.com... >> >> >> Keith wrote: >> >>> rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com says... >>> >>> > And you think you can defeat 'radical Islam' with bombs and bullets ? >>> >>> I know there is no choice. Perhaps you want to submit? >> >> There is no need to 'submit' >> >> You're living in a perversely stupid fantasy paranoid world. > >It comes from the constant bombardment by Bush's fear-mongering--it's his >way of keeping power over people. I think you should start to listen to Bush instead of listening to other people supposedly repeating what Bush said. I would suggest you start with his January, 2006 TV speech. > People start to lose perspective on what >is happening and why. It really is a very powerful narcotic. People can also lose perspective if they assume that Bush is always wrong and is the cause of all ills which is the only thing you hear from his political opposition. This causes a lot of people to overlook the fact that these same politicians do not intend to deal with the threat to the nation. /BAH
From: jmfbahciv on 5 Oct 2006 06:57 In article <452391C5.FF964899(a)hotmail.com>, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> lparker(a)emory.edu (Lloyd Parker) wrote: >> >> >Keith Olbermann had a good commentary a week or two ago about Bush calling a >> >criticism "unacceptable." >> >> Which criticism was unacceptable? > >Watch this. I can't. I'm not going to the library for this one. <snip> /BAH
From: Kurt Ullman on 5 Oct 2006 08:00 In article <yB%Ug.9910$e66.1023(a)newssvr13.news.prodigy.com>, <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: > "Kurt Ullman" <kurtullman(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:kurtullman-9EC767.19185804102006(a)customer-201-125-217-207.uninet.net.mx.. > . > > In article <lef8i2prust90bdlna6vmp1r0h9p7a7a95(a)4ax.com>, > > Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon(a)My-Web-Site.com> wrote: > > > > > >> Of course. But I can record and then hand over to the government, no > >> sweat, no warrant, nada. > >> > > Plenty of sweat. Any half-way sentient defense attorney is going > > to try and suggest you were acting as an agent of the cops in a rather > > blatant attempt to circumvent the rights of my poor, misunderstood > > client who killed those 25 people because he overdosed on twinkies. > > Might actually make the case. Seen it happen often enough. > > What, overdosing on Twinkies? *That* can't be pretty. > There have been a coupla attorneys who tried that defense. Something about a sugar jag leading to them killing or at seriously injuring someone. Can't remember right off if it worked or not. Our defense attorneys are nothin' if not creative.
From: Kurt Ullman on 5 Oct 2006 08:02 In article <Zx0Vg.51549$E67.33109(a)clgrps13>, "Homer J Simpson" <nobody(a)nowhere.com> wrote: > "John Larkin" <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote in message > news:t1v8i21l8kal7h6td3j4nr6gir8t5b26mu(a)4ax.com... > > > Sounds strange to me. The people I know have traveled a lot, and many > > have lived in other countries. Americans are often fans and admirers > > of other countries and languages. As for not being very introspective, > > that is true of many Americans, and it's generally a virtue: jobs, > > hobbies, interests, causes, and family are a lot more interesting than > > narcissistic, neurotic self-absorption. Maybe you are mistaking > > politeness and open-mindedness for being gullible: they are different. > > > > Of course America is big, with beaches, glaciers, mountains, rivers, > > an enormous variety of geography and cultures. Not all Americans elect > > to fly overseas when we have 50 different states of our own to > > explore. Your thinking seems to be undisturbed by actual knowledge of > > the US. > > And what percentage of Americans have ever been further than Canada or > Mexico? Or have even left their own state? > > Ever watch Jay Leno? Yep that certainly meets my criteria for a well-done population study....
From: jmfbahciv on 5 Oct 2006 07:00
In article <MPG.1f8d931454252de4989d60(a)News.Individual.NET>, Keith <krw(a)att.bizzzz> wrote: >In article <efvurj$8ss_006(a)s811.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com>, >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com says... >> In article <eftq1i$c8p$3(a)leto.cc.emory.edu>, >> lparker(a)emory.edu (Lloyd Parker) wrote: >> >In article <p1iUg.9199$e66.6609(a)newssvr13.news.prodigy.com>, >> > <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: >> >> >> >>"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message >> >>news:452198F0.A71D16AC(a)hotmail.com... >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> John Fields wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> You miss no opportunity to lambaste the US, its population, its >> >>>> government, its institutions, and you hate its very existence, so >> >>>> what do you expect me to think, that you're a benevolent soul trying >> >>>> to help with constructive criticism? >> >>> >> >>> I thought it was fine under Clinton ! >> >> >> >>Yes, but you see, if he denigrates your point of view by labelling you as >> >>someone that could never say anything good about the US, then he doesn't >> >>have to take your point of view seriously and try to understand that perhaps >> >>it might even be a valid point of view, that an intelligent person may be >> >>capable of coming to through independent thought. It's the same thing the >> >>Bush administration does by labelling everyone that disagrees with it a >> >>"traitor" (under the *extremely* liberal interpretations that disagreeing >> >>with your government is tantamount to aiding the enemy.) What they seem to >> >>fail to understand is that the Constitution gives every US citizen is given >> >>the *responsibility* to question its government *every single* day of their >> >>lives. It really is sad that the Bush administration has seen fit to >> >>legitimize this sort of anti-American behavior. >> >> >> >>Eric Lucas >> >> >> >> >> > >> >Keith Olbermann had a good commentary a week or two ago about Bush calling a >> >criticism "unacceptable." >> >> Which criticism was unacceptable? >> >> I don't understand you people; first you complain that he can't >> think for himself; then, you object when he expresses his opinion about >> something. >> >> You can't have it both ways. > >Eeyore (a.k.a. the stuffed donkey) can. He's a two-faced Europeon. Do no dismiss this. It's going to be a serious problem because Europe is going to expect the US to deal with the big mess that will be made by these extremists. In their zeal to prove that Bush is bad, people who think this way will also assist in making a mess for the sake of revenge. /BAH |