Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: jmfbahciv on 5 Oct 2006 06:47 In article <sxVUg.13307$7I1.4380(a)newssvr27.news.prodigy.net>, <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: > >"T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote in message >news:wo6dnaYdAMyDh7nYRVny3w(a)pipex.net... >> >> <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message >> news:efvu0c$8ss_002(a)s811.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... >> >>> Well, I'd like to have a few less crapolas posts so I can find >>> the ones were posted by thoughtful people. >> >> Reasonable enough wish, although it carries the risk that you only read >> posts which say things you already agree with.... Always seems kind of >> pointless to me. > >Seems that's what most people in this discussion want...and if you don't >give it to them, they'll swear at you, insult you, and even threaten >physical violence and assault. Yes, I know. I'm trying to figure out how to quell this useless behaviour. I don't seem to have figured it out yet. It is a part of the overall solution the extremists' danger, though. > I have learned a lot from the few >*reasonable* posters in this thread, both those I agree with *and* those I >don't...and there are even a few people in the discussion with whom I >disagree but they still showed respect for my opinion. It's too bad that >everyone else is so insecure in themselves and their views that the >slightest difference of opinion brings obscenity, insults and threats of >violence instead of healthy discussion. You do understand that the ones who cannot (and I mean that they are incapable) think objectively and discuss all aspects of a problem have to speak this way. They also have to appear to be a member of what is currently perceived as the majority. This week somebody has decided that I must be portrayed as stupid. The first line written had to associate me with Bush and Cheney. I found this extremely amusing and interesting, albeit sad. In order for me to tweak out my hidden assumptions, I need to have discussions with people who have a different perspective. /BAH
From: jmfbahciv on 5 Oct 2006 06:49 In article <45239288.D1269ADD(a)hotmail.com>, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >> >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> >mmeron(a)cars3.uchicago.edu wrote: >> >> >> "T Wake" writes: >> >> >> >> >> >> >The victory conditions are either nonsensical or nonachievable. Has any >> >> >> >"War on Terror" been won? >> >> >> > >> >> >> The term "War on Terror" is a misnomer. It really should be "The war >> >> >> on Islamic extremism". Terror is just a tool. >> >> > >> >> >Obfuscation noted. >> >> > >> >> >So, are you saying it's possible to win a 'war on Islamic extremism' ? >> >> >> >> This mess is about changing a mindset; either Western civilization's >> >> mindset is changed or religious extremists' mindset is changed. >> > >> >And seemingly both sides reckon it can be acheived by violent means ! >> >> You have overlooked that the extremists' methods are approved >> by their religion. > >No they aren't. You're ignorant to think so. > > >> Rewards are booty if living and some >> male nonsense if killed while committing this violence. > >Utter rubbish. Oh, my. You do have a very efficient reality filter. /BAH
From: jmfbahciv on 5 Oct 2006 06:51 In article <452390F5.E960000B(a)hotmail.com>, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: >> >"T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote in message >> >> "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message >> >>> T Wake wrote: >> >>>> <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message >> >>>> >> >>>> > This mess is about changing a mindset; either Western civilization's >> >>>> > mindset is changed or religious extremists' mindset is changed. >> >>>> >> >>>> I agree completely. >> >>> >> >>> How about removing the either and replacing the or with and ? >> >> >> >> Also an option. Any one of those three will work. >> > >> >I think the mutual concession option >> >> This option does not exist. > >You can't accept that Islam isn't a threat to your lifestyle ? Not only is it a threat, but it has already begun to alter my lifestyle. My goal is to ensure that it alter 100% of my lifestyle, if I'm allowed to exist. /BAH
From: JoeBloe on 5 Oct 2006 07:56 On Wed, 4 Oct 2006 21:48:37 +0100, "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> Gave us: > ...are part of >the great Islamic quest for world domination.... > What is so great about it?
From: JoeBloe on 5 Oct 2006 07:58
On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 00:27:53 GMT, "Homer J Simpson" <nobody(a)nowhere.com> Gave us: > >"JoeBloe" <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message >news:41t5i2t6cs7srv8lq3nbj33hiuvb8p1ju9(a)4ax.com... > >>>Now you are a stalker? >>> >> >> Jeez. A remark like that proves that you are a complete idiot. > >Going from discussion to trying to find personal identification? Pretty much >the definition. > This is Usenet, dumbass. "Finger" and many other trace utilities have been around for decades as well as the right to utilize them. If you were any more clueless, you'd be the definition of something... RETARDEDNESS. |