Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: jmfbahciv on 16 Jan 2007 09:33 In article <7472a$45aba4b1$49ecfc6$17552(a)DIALUPUSA.NET>, unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote: >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > >> In article <d8a21$45ab8ca9$4fe773b$16654(a)DIALUPUSA.NET>, >> unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote: >> >>>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>> >>>>In article <45AB78A2.85C71A50(a)hotmail.com>, >>>> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> kensmith(a)green.rahul.net (Ken Smith) wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>So what do you expect from this 20K more troops? It isn't enough extra >> >> to >> >>>>>>>make a difference so it must be symbolic or political. Please explain >> >> how >> >>>>>>>they make anything better. >>>>>> >>>>>>I don't know if 20K more will do the job. I do know that the key >>>>>>is to get the Iraqi middle class back and working. >>>>> >>>>>Working where ? >>>> >>>> >>>>C'mon, eeyore. It does not become you to pretend to be that >>>>stupid. >>> >>>He's not pretending. >> >> >> In this case, eeyore was trying be cute. > >Maternal instincts kicking in? LOL Every once in a while you get pathetic. I'm learning from eeyore and what he says and what his unconscious assumptions are. /BAH
From: Eeyore on 16 Jan 2007 09:43 jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > But it isn't Bush who is talking about atomic bombs in Iran. Yes it is. > It is Iran who is doing this talk and they've even talked about > first and second targets. Iran has publicly denied even any desire to develop 'the bomb'. Which targets ? Who talked about them ? > They have a bombing list. Where is it ? Have you seen it ? > Do you think they are lying? They don't have to lie. You're just making this stuff up now ! Why are you doing that ? Graham
From: Ken Smith on 16 Jan 2007 09:44 In article <e3860$45acd0b4$4fe713a$26561(a)DIALUPUSA.NET>, unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote: >Ken Smith wrote: > >> In article <1ad2f$45aa7fb7$4fe76e9$22623(a)DIALUPUSA.NET>, >> unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote: >> >>>Ken Smith wrote: >> >> [....] >> >>>>So what do you expect from this 20K more troops? It isn't enough extra to >>>>make a difference so it must be symbolic or political. Please explain how >>>>they make anything better. >>> >>>I've said before, disarm the population, seal the border, and we >>>can leave. >> >> >> Good plan, but with 20K more troops, there is no chance of doing so. With >> a few 100K perhaps it could be done. > >20K can easily seal the borders in fairly short order. Then it >becomes a combination of clearing the worse areas of weapons >and attrition of weapons because no new ones are getting in. I very seriously doubt that it could be done with 20K troops. In any case, your idea isn't going to be tried. Bush is telling them to paint on bullseyes and stand on street corners. > -- -- kensmith(a)rahul.net forging knowledge
From: Eeyore on 16 Jan 2007 09:45 Ken Smith wrote: > <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote: > > What we are trying to tell you is that you are (or Bush is) creating the > unrecoverable mess not preventing it. > > >The fact seems to be that, unless these matters become country > >vs. country, no danger exists. This is dangerous nonsense. > > No, we have been telling you about the real danger. There aren't enough > terrorists to cause the downfall of the west unless the west helps. > Unfortunatley, lately the west has been helping. The USA is indeed Al Qaeda's best ever recruiting sergeant ! Graham
From: Eeyore on 16 Jan 2007 09:46
jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > Why do you think there was a conflict in Southeast Asia after > France left? You mean *before* France left actually. Graham |