From: Ken Smith on
In article <ermig4$8ss_001(a)s774.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com>,
<jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote:
>In article <erhmkg$em5$3(a)blue.rahul.net>,
> kensmith(a)green.rahul.net (Ken Smith) wrote:
>>In article <erhe08$8qk_008(a)s916.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com>,
>> <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote:
>>>In article <b708b$45db13c4$cdd084b9$32231(a)DIALUPUSA.NET>,
>>> "nonsense(a)unsettled.com" <nonsense(a)unsettled.com> wrote:
>>>>Ken Smith wrote:
>>>>
>>[.....]
>>>>We use thresholds to pigeonhole. The entire discussion,
>>>>which didn't get they bites I had hoped it would, has
>>>>to do with how we study nature more than it does with
>>>>the realities within nature.
>>>
>>>The only way we know how to study is to take snapshots.
>>>That's why it's so difficult to grok photons and electron
>>>orbits. :-)
>>
>>This is not true. I doubt that Dr. Kent Cullers would even begin to
>>agree. Many people tink in terms of the sweep of motion, the feel of
>>things and how they sound. They do not have to freeze the situation in
>>their mind to study it.
>
>They do when they measure an event.

The term "measure an event" is your problem. It is limiting your thinking
about this.

>
>> For that matter that would hinder their mode of
>>thinking.
>
>I wasn't talking about thinking; I was talking about measurement.
>
>/BAH
>


--
--
kensmith(a)rahul.net forging knowledge

From: Tony Lance on
Big Bertha Thing features
Cosmic Ray Series
Possible Real World System Constructs
http://web.onetel.com/~tonylance/features.html
6K Web Page
Astrophysics net ring access site
Newsgroup Reviews including sci.space.policy

Features, hyperbole and blurb, on the Pastures package and the quest.

From Pastures Software Package Documentation.
(Particle Structure Results Program in Fortran 77.)
Sub-atomic Mesons, Baryons and Leptons Classification System.
(C) Copyright Tony Lance 1997
Distribute complete and free of charge to comply.

Big Bertha Thing language

The purest form of the english language is contained
in the dead sea scrolls. There is not a lot of it, even there.

Pure english language is a bit like house dust, all dead skin.

The living bits of the english language are anything but pure,
borrowing from a dozen drunken, pilaging, barbarian invaders,
with not one good intention between them.

(C) Copyright Tony Lance 1997.
To comply with my copyright,
please distribute complete and free of charge.

Tony Lance
judemarie(a)bigberthathing.co.uk
From: MassiveProng on
On Fri, 23 Feb 07 12:26:21 GMT, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com Gave us:

>All of this is single-task, single user thinking.


You're an idiot. You wouldn't know what a modern process thread was,
OR how it worked if your life depended on it.
From: MassiveProng on
On Fri, 23 Feb 07 12:26:21 GMT, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com Gave us:

> from a naive user POV.


Said the twit that reads Usenet and does her "computing" from a dumb
terminal in ASCII.
From: MassiveProng on
On Fri, 23 Feb 07 12:30:20 GMT, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com Gave us:

>
>You cannot know what is incorrect because you've already been
>herded into doing online banking.
>
>/BAH


I haven't and you're incorrect... stupid even.