Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: MassiveProng on 21 Feb 2007 08:13 On Wed, 21 Feb 07 12:43:30 GMT, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com Gave us: >Go back and read my analogy about the pop bottle. You're an idiot, and that analogy, along with a lot of other things you have said prove it.
From: MassiveProng on 21 Feb 2007 08:21 On Wed, 21 Feb 07 12:50:32 GMT, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com Gave us: >4 was unacceptable in 1968. What has the biz come to? You can hang like 32 com ports up on a specialized system. Likely more. Yes, I am talking about PCs. You have been out of the loop for far too long, and the result is that you are loopy.
From: T Wake on 21 Feb 2007 08:43 <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message news:erhebv$8qk_011(a)s916.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... > In article <9NydnaIENPhTkkbYnZ2dnUVZ8vidnZ2d(a)pipex.net>, > "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: >> >>"Ken Smith" <kensmith(a)green.rahul.net> wrote in message >>news:erf1cd$39q$3(a)blue.rahul.net... >>> In article <ereol0$8ss_011(a)s883.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com>, >>> <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote: >>> [....] >>>>Tell me which newsgroup should be deleted. The poster didn't say. >>> >>> I think it was alt.the.big.whiners >> >>and alt.unable.to.ignore.threads > > Since you are the one who has been adding them, I suggest dropping > the stones. Interesting. What is your point here? Do you think I am complaining that this thread is crossposted? Do you think it is on topic for sci.med [*] or do you just leave that newsgroup there because everyone else posts to it? As I pointed out, everyone is able to ignore threads which don't interest them. Even if a thread interests them every one is able to ignore posts which don't interest them. People are free to add or remove any newsgroups they feel appropriate, even if I don't find them appropriate. What of that do you disagree with? -- [*] or any of the groups to be honest.
From: jmfbahciv on 21 Feb 2007 08:43 In article <fohot29ajnjcor6od5b11e4c492v9sn36o(a)4ax.com>, MassiveProng <MassiveProng(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote: >On Wed, 21 Feb 07 12:50:32 GMT, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com Gave us: > >>4 was unacceptable in 1968. What has the biz come to? > > > You can hang like 32 com ports up on a specialized system. Likely >more. 32 is too few. In 1969, a PDP-8 had banks of 16. > >Yes, I am talking about PCs. I know. You have a severe case of PCitis. > > You have been out of the loop for far too long, and the result is >that you are loopy. Why can't you think of numbers in the thousands? /BAH
From: Tony Lance on 21 Feb 2007 09:07
Big Bertha Thing Battle Cosmic Ray Series Possible Real World System Constructs http://web.onetel.com/~tonylance/battle.html Access page to 600K ZIP file Astrophysics net ring access site Newsgroup Reviews including misc.health.aids 301 files from the first battle of cyberspace. Big Bertha Thing Battle 1. Do not fight. 2. Fight on ground of your own choosing. 3. Make sure you have got an edge. 4. Is it worth dying for? Spam stands for:- Spleen Paucity Artless Monosylabic It includes newbies, spammers, spam busters and even sometimes victim support. The only good spam is branded spam, which is more Sesame Street than Darth Vader. To the victor the spoils, of the 1st Battle of Cyberspace. (20 family jewels and the 301 files.) This has been a serious exercise, under the auspices of the Pastures project, OUSA Classical Particle, in conjunction with OUSA Research. Thank you, Tony Lance Big Bertha Thing farm From Bibliography of Pastures.(Optional) The preface from An Elementary Treatment of Gyroscopes and Similar Spinning Tops by Crabtree 1909 Classic Cartoon and animated cartoon of Animal Farm by George Orwell Tony Lance judemarie(a)bigberthathing.co.uk |