Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: Ken Smith on 8 Mar 2007 09:59 In article <esp193$8qk_002(a)s1016.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com>, <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote: >In article <esou80$8qk_001(a)s1016.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com>, > jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>In article <esml4r$bj2$3(a)blue.rahul.net>, >> kensmith(a)green.rahul.net (Ken Smith) wrote: >>>In article <esmalk$8qk_001(a)s1012.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com>, >>> <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote: >>>>In article <esjvn9$1a4$4(a)blue.rahul.net>, >>>> kensmith(a)green.rahul.net (Ken Smith) wrote: >>>[....] >>>>>If you know what you intend to write onto the tape, figure out what the >>>>>checksum will be and then write the tape as you intend there is no extra >>>>>effort needed. >>>> >>>>That does not give you a checksummed directory of the physical >>>>tape you just made. All the handwaving and blustering you >>>>are doing still does not satisfy the requirement. >>> >>>Yes it does. Imagine it step by step. >>> >>>(1) >>>You calculate the checksum of what you intend to put on the tape. >>> >>>(2) >>>You put exactly what you intend onto the tape >>> >>>(3) >>>You calculate the checksum of what you have put on the tape. >> >>The checksum of the contents of the tape is not interesting. >>That is a summary and doesn't help. A bit by bit verify >>is done instead of your checksum summary. >> >>The record of the checksums of each file on the tape is >>the needed information. That itemized record is put into >>a file which is the first file on the tape. > >Let me try to explain using different lingo. > >The first file on the tape, TAPE.DIR, is the invoice of the >distribution and contains a list of each item on the tape, >including that item's checksum. ..... and it includes its own checksum. This checksum can be made to be correct by the method I suggested. -- -- kensmith(a)rahul.net forging knowledge
From: MassiveProng on 8 Mar 2007 19:22 On Thu, 08 Mar 07 11:48:40 GMT, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com Gave us: >As I said above, our OS philosophy was to provide multiple pathways. >Multiple pathways...do you understand what that means? So why >are you demeaning the OS philosophy with an argument about networks? Networking is a MAJOR part of a modern OS, dingledorf. Ever seen a VME chassis stuffed with SMBs and fiber channel, and ethernet net cards? Or do you even know what an SMB is, much less fiber channel? Would you have to look up what "FDDI" means? Oh, that's right... you are still stuck in RS-232 mindset. Do you have ANY USB devices? DO you even own an ethernet patch cable or have a machine with an ethernet port on it?
From: MassiveProng on 8 Mar 2007 19:24 On Thu, 08 Mar 07 11:54:26 GMT, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com Gave us: >Is this because disk capacities are larger than most needs? With >the habits of downloading music and videos, etc. won't there be >another capacity problem fairly soon? TeraByte drives are looming on the horizon as we speak. And those are in 2.5" form factor. Keep up much?
From: MassiveProng on 8 Mar 2007 21:16 On Thu, 8 Mar 2007 20:56:15 -0500, krw <krw(a)att.bizzzz> Gave us: >Can't even put a sentence together, eh Dimbulb? "Us" is not >singular. It is a song title, retard boy. Try to keep up, dumbfucktard.
From: jmfbahciv on 9 Mar 2007 06:25
In article <2v91v2pjpp3qdcn8mv70t5rk21t7g1oeem(a)4ax.com>, MassiveProng <MassiveProng(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote: >On Thu, 08 Mar 07 11:48:40 GMT, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com Gave us: > >>As I said above, our OS philosophy was to provide multiple pathways. >>Multiple pathways...do you understand what that means? So why >>are you demeaning the OS philosophy with an argument about networks? > > > Networking is a MAJOR part of a modern OS, dingledorf. It shouldn't be. Routing should be kept off user machines. > > Ever seen a VME chassis stuffed with SMBs and fiber channel, and >ethernet net cards? > > Or do you even know what an SMB is, much less fiber channel? >Would you have to look up what "FDDI" means? > > Oh, that's right... you are still stuck in RS-232 mindset. That doesn't look familiar. > > Do you have ANY USB devices? DO you even own an ethernet patch >cable or have a machine with an ethernet port on it? You might try to read the listings of ANF-10. /BAH |