Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: Daniel Mandic on 19 Oct 2006 06:31 Eeyore wrote: > Maybe they're afraid ppl will see that science disproves God ? That's > what happened to me actually in a rather amusing way. > > Graham Hi Graham! That will not happen as well as Thermodynamics will not stay on the same degree. Kind Regards, Daniel Mandic
From: JoeBloe on 19 Oct 2006 06:36 On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 17:41:12 +0100, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> Gave us: > > >John Fields wrote: > >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >John Fields wrote: >> >> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> >John Fields wrote: >> >> >> >> >> You seem to forget one tiny little detail, and that's that we didn't >> >> >> go after Saddam Hussein for the WTC, we went after him because of >> >> >> his defiance of the UN, his refusal to comply with their sanctions >> >> >> and inspections, and our belief that he was either developing, or in >> >> >> possession of, WMD. >> >> > >> >> >You mean the fiction you invented. >> >> >> >> --- >> >> So you think it was about the WTC even though UBL admitted >> >> responsibility for that? >> > >> >The fiction about the supposed weapons. >> >> --- >> The jury's still out on that one. > >No it's not. You're an idiot.
From: JoeBloe on 19 Oct 2006 06:43 On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 18:04:04 +0100, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> Gave us: > > >John Larkin wrote: > >> Ah, your concern is not about peace. It's not about democracy, or >> human rights, or the health or nutrition or safety of the poorest >> people in the world. > >And the USA'a *IS* ????? > Yes, DonkTARD! Despite what your widdle bwain thinks, we are the most giving nation on the planet, and none of your bent statistics can change that fact.
From: JoeBloe on 19 Oct 2006 06:44 On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 18:06:04 +0100, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> Gave us: >It's still quite mad. ^^ You spelled "I'm" incorrectly, DonkTARD.
From: JoeBloe on 19 Oct 2006 06:45
On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 18:10:06 +0100, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> Gave us: > > >John Fields wrote: > >> And you're defending that pig? Shame on you. > >I'm criticising the USA. And the 650,000 deaths you've caused. > The number is wrong. It would still be high even if cut in half. |