Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: jmfbahciv on 19 Oct 2006 07:53 In article <YrGdnWfM1rcLD6vYRVnyiA(a)pipex.net>, "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: > ><jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message >news:eh5425$8qk_010(a)s847.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... >> In article <0oWdnYXsM90H3KjYnZ2dnUVZ8sudnZ2d(a)pipex.net>, >> "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: >>> >>>"John Larkin" <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote in >>>message >>>news:009aj2dksthbu9fopngsr64nhfofi1dnjl(a)4ax.com... >>>> On Tue, 17 Oct 06 12:40:58 GMT, jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>>> >>>>>In article <odi8j25ttpiuu9t6tbg4jne9cdut88qmin(a)4ax.com>, >>>>> John Larkin <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: >>>>>>On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 17:38:14 +0100, Eeyore >>>>>><rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Lloyd Parker wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> JoeBloe <joebloe(a)thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> > All of Islam (read the moslems) believe that all others that are >>>>>>>> > not >>>>>>>> >moslem are "infidels" and that killing them is not, nor should not >>>>>>>> >be >>>>>>>> >a crime. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You are lying. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>I suspect it's what he learnt at Church. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>American Christian fundamentalists are as dangerous if not more so >>>>>>>than >>>>>their >>>>>>>Muslim counterparts. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>Yeah, all those Southern Baptist suicide bombers. >>>>> >>>>>Sigh! Wait. If this gets results it will be tried. >>>>>Have you not noticed what's been happening lately? >>>>>And it's not just Southern Baptist. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Judiasism and Christianity have generally considered suicide to be a >>>> sin. Radical Islam considers it to be a holy act. >>> >>>An interpretation issue really. It would not be unreasonable for Radical >>>Christians or Jews to redefine some aspects of their faith to enable >>>suicide >>>for a just cause. The bible has killing anyone a sin, >> >> Murder is a sin; this is not "not killing anyone". > >"Thou shalt not kill" > >State sanctioned murder is still murder, otherwise what Saddam Hussein did >to the marsh arabs was not murder. That is how westerners view his killing (as murder). > >>>Christians have been >>>fairly free with the definition of this though. >> >> Do you kill where kill is deliberate cessation of a living thing? > >I am not a Christian so I do not see where this is going. > >Killing some one is, IMHO, ending their life against their wishes. It is in everyone's hardware to have a will to survive. > >Why? Do you kill where kill is deliberate cessation of a living thing? Yes. I need to eat to keep living. I also try to keep vermin and other critters from tresspassing in my house. If a human being is threatening my existenece and I have evidence that the intention is real, I will kill or expect someone else (whose job is to protect me and mine) to kill him/her/them. /BAH
From: lucasea on 19 Oct 2006 10:13 <jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message news:eh7ksa$8ss_018(a)s977.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... > In article <bFtZg.15970$e66.4970(a)newssvr13.news.prodigy.com>, > <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: >> >><jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message >>news:eh53ce$8qk_005(a)s847.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... >>> In article <OF7Zg.17270$6S3.4818(a)newssvr25.news.prodigy.net>, >>> <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: >>>> >>>><jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message >>>>news:eh2k1e$8qk_002(a)s777.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... >>>>> In article <e97b6$4534dd17$4fe728b$30183(a)DIALUPUSA.NET>, >>>>> unsettled <unsettled(a)nonsense.com> wrote: >>>>>>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> I can state my hidden agenda; preserve the world's accumulated >>>>>>> knowledge. Religious extremists have the goal of destroying >>>>>>> most of that knowledge. Islamic extremists have the goal of >>>>>>> destroying it all because it's a product of Western civilization. >>>>>> >>>>>>Religious extremism is always the result of one of the following: >>>>>> >>>>>>A) Insanity >>>>>> >>>>>>B) Desire for power, control, and wealth >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> None of the above. Fear. Pure, simple terror. >>>> >>>>OK, if you must, then "fear of losing power, control and wealth". >>>>Witness >>>>the fear-mongering among the Religious Right in the current election >>>>campaign. >>> >>> I am. More alarming is the message of the Democrats who keep implying >>> that there isn't any problem. >> >>Citation, please. In your zeal to support the current administration, >>you're not listening carefully. > > Listen to any of them. Again, cite one please. You're not listening carefully. Eric Lucas
From: Eeyore on 19 Oct 2006 10:22 jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > I give up. It is going to take a nuclear bomb set off in > the tenderest place before any of you will begin to think > about the real danger. Try describing this danger accurately and in detail and then ask yourself if it isn't an imaginary danger after all for all practical purposes. Graham
From: Eeyore on 19 Oct 2006 10:22 JoeBloe wrote: > On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 18:04:04 +0100, Eeyore wrote > > >John Larkin wrote: > > > >> Ah, your concern is not about peace. It's not about democracy, or > >> human rights, or the health or nutrition or safety of the poorest > >> people in the world. > > > >And the USA'a *IS* ????? > > > Yes, DonkTARD! Despite what your widdle bwain thinks, we are the > most giving nation on the planet, and none of your bent statistics can > change that fact. No you're not. You're a bunch of meanies. Graham
From: Eeyore on 19 Oct 2006 10:23
JoeBloe wrote: > On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 18:10:06 +0100, Eeyore > <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> Gave us: > >John Fields wrote: > > > >> And you're defending that pig? Shame on you. > > > >I'm criticising the USA. And the 650,000 deaths you've caused. > > > The number is wrong. It would still be high even if cut in half. And you *know* this how ? Graham |