Jihad needs scientists
in [Design]
|
From: Eeyore on 28 Oct 2006 07:45 jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > > > >> Which word of the phrase "World Trade Center" > >> do you not understand? > > > >In a much earlier post you suggested that Islam was anti-capitalist / > business. > >Maybe you'd like to take a look at this ? Or maybe you'd prefer to continue > >living in ignorance of the facts ? > > > >http://www.bahrainwtc.com/ > > I don't webbit and it's too stormy to go to the library today. You're incapable of browsing the web from home ? Just how blinkered are you ? > However, it seems that you are making the assumption you accuse > me of making; namely, that all Muslims deem capitalism as an unIslamic > condition. They don't in any way. Where did you ever get such an insane idea ? The Gulf States in particular tend to be very modern and forward looking. > The threat comes from Muslims who believe that *all* > Western civilization activities are bad. Muslims *love* trade. Your ideas are quite barking mad ! Graham
From: Eeyore on 28 Oct 2006 07:48 jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > "T Wake" <usenet.es7at(a)gishpuppy.com> wrote: > > >Groundhog post - the WTC was not the centre of world trade. It was named the > >World Trade Center in the same manner that the World Series involves very > >few nations. > > > >A name is a name. Its function was different from what you seem to imply > >here. > > Are you talking about the restaurants and shops that provided > services for the 50,000 (est.#) people who worked there? No. He's saying it was just a catchy name for a big office complex. There are 74 more World Trade Centers around the world including several in Muslim countries. However you've shown in a recent post that you don't want to see these. The NewYork WTC was *not* the centre of world trade ! Graham
From: jmfbahciv on 28 Oct 2006 06:46 In article <JF30h.23219$6S3.11686(a)newssvr25.news.prodigy.net>, <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: > ><jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message >news:ehq91o$8qk_002(a)s783.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... >> In article <lyr%g.21239$e66.304(a)newssvr13.news.prodigy.com>, >> <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: >>> >>><jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message >>>news:ehkutu$8qk_006(a)s772.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com... >> <snip> >> >>>> Here is a religious extremism whose stated goal is to destroy >>>> Western civilization. >>> >>>Evidence, please. This, once again, is at best an extremist >>>over-interpretation of what anyone has actually said. >> >> You have been given evidence. You do not accept it. I'm not >> going to repeat posts and I don't the others, who also >> posted evidence, will either. > >I've not seen it. That's weird since you replied to those posts. > So you refuse to give evidence, then you cover that up >with "you have been given evidence." Nice disingenuous debating tactic. And your tactic is to negate all I say and then demand that I give evidence that my comments are wrong. I can't argue with that. /BAH >Eric Lucas > >
From: Eeyore on 28 Oct 2006 07:49 jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > "MooseFET" <kensmith(a)rahul.net> wrote: > >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > > >> I haven't heard Republicans say them and > >> Democrats always leave it off their list of items we have > >> to do to become less dependent on oil imports. > > > >Once again simply false. Try a bit of googling. > > > Anybody can edit any ASCII that's out there. So you're just going to deny everything on the 'net ? Just how feeble-minded and afraid of challenging ideas are you ? Graham
From: Eeyore on 28 Oct 2006 07:51
jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote: > "MooseFET" <kensmith(a)rahul.net> wrote: > > >Currently the US imports a lot of oil to run cars and the like. You > >can make automotive fuel from other things but the energy to do so is > >more than you get back. In a market where energy cost money, you will > >continue to use oil. > > > You people are not thinking! Scenario: oil imports stop. So who's going to be buying the oil instead of the USA ? Where did the oil go ? Graham |