From: jmfbahciv on
In article <4543423D.7C3A2311(a)hotmail.com>,
Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote:
>
>> <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>>
>> >Your pompousness aside, so what? It was just a couple of buildings full
of
>> >people, mostly Americans.
>>
>> The primary purpose of the occupants was global trade.
>
>Not especially. It was just a catchy name for a big office block.

Yes. That is how the mayor got the building filled up; by attracting
businesses that dealt in world trade.


>
>
>> This is
>> the part of human society that keeps it functioning, growing,
>> thriving. Remove that and you have a dark ages.
>
>See these Muslim centres of trade.
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Petronas_towers
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dubai_World_Trade_Centre
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Putra_World_Trade_Centre
>
>And this list of 74 buildings also called " World Trade Center "
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_trade_center

And the goal of those extremists is to destroy it.

/BAH
From: Eeyore on


jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote:

> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> >jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote:
> >> <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> >>
> >> >Your pompousness aside, so what? It was just a couple of buildings full
> >> >of people, mostly Americans.
> >>
> >> The primary purpose of the occupants was global trade.
> >
> >Not especially. It was just a catchy name for a big office block.
>
> Yes. That is how the mayor got the building filled up; by attracting
> businesses that dealt in world trade.

Largely financial institutions as far as I know. That's not exclusively about
world trade.


> >> This is
> >> the part of human society that keeps it functioning, growing,
> >> thriving. Remove that and you have a dark ages.
> >
> >See these Muslim centres of trade.
> >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Petronas_towers
> >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dubai_World_Trade_Centre
> >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Putra_World_Trade_Centre
> >
> >And this list of 74 buildings also called " World Trade Center "
> >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_trade_center
>
> And the goal of those extremists is to destroy it.

Cite ?

You mean 'them' surely ?

So you accept that these extremists must be in a tiny minority then or these
Muslim World Trade Centers would bever have been built.

Graham

From: lucasea on

"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:45433F9F.F6808F39(a)hotmail.com...
>
>
> jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote:
>
>> "MooseFET" <kensmith(a)rahul.net> wrote:
>>
>> [Clinton]
>> >(C)
>> >Pressed the Saudi government to reduce support for the Wahhabis. This
>> >I remember because it was a near perfect failure.
>>
>> I don't call asking a government to reduce support for its brand
>> of religion an effective action.
>
> It's not *its brand of religion* at all !
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wahabbi
>
>> That's spitting into a gale
>> force wind with expectations that you'll hit the sidewalk
>> a hundred miles away.
>
> How would you deal with it then ?

And more to the point...exactly how did the Bush administration deal with it
before 9/11. Eight months is a lot of time...surely he could have done
*something* besides ignore the recommendations of his predecessor.

Eric Lucas


From: lucasea on

<jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message
news:ehvga6$8qk_008(a)s964.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com...
> In article <45433F9F.F6808F39(a)hotmail.com>,
> Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>jmfbahciv(a)aol.com wrote:
>>
>>> "MooseFET" <kensmith(a)rahul.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> [Clinton]
>>> >(C)
>>> >Pressed the Saudi government to reduce support for the Wahhabis. This
>>> >I remember because it was a near perfect failure.
>>>
>>> I don't call asking a government to reduce support for its brand
>>> of religion an effective action.
>>
>>It's not *its brand of religion* at all !
>>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wahabbi
>>
>>> That's spitting into a gale
>>> force wind with expectations that you'll hit the sidewalk
>>> a hundred miles away.
>>
>>How would you deal with it then ?
>
> I'd establish a nation with a capitalistic, representative democracy
> with a secular education system mandatory for all residents
> smack dab in the middle of that mess.

Yeah? And how is that one working out for you?

Eric Lucas


From: lucasea on

<jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message
news:ehv9q8$8qk_002(a)s964.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com...
> In article <yir0h.17056$TV3.1877(a)newssvr21.news.prodigy.com>,
> <lucasea(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>>
>><jmfbahciv(a)aol.com> wrote in message
>>news:ehsnps$8qk_006(a)s834.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com...
>>>
>>>>Only bin Laden has attacked us.
>>>
>>> I see. Your approach is to fix the pimple on the skin and
>>> not the disease that caused the pimple. I don't work that
>>> way.
>>
>>No, your approach is to cut off the head, to make sure the acne is cured.
>
> If the cause of the pimple is so virulent that cutting the head
> off will prevent tranmission of the disease, yes. I'm not talking
> about an annoying skin bump.

So you can envision a problem that is so bad that killing yourself, and
taking out over half a million other people, is a viable solution? What
*exactly* makes you different than the suicide bombers?

Eric Lucas