Known physics defeated by simple puzzle?
in [Relativity]
|
From: PD on 13 Apr 2010 10:50 On Apr 13, 8:48 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > On Apr 12, 6:59 pm, "papar...(a)gmail.com" <papar...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Dear Miguel: Most laughable (!) science journals are affiliated with > one or more universities. This is an error of fact. Journals are in fact produced by publishing companies and have no affiliation whatsoever with universities. Universities do *subscribe* to the journals, along with many other subscribers. Stop making things up to fuel your conspiracy paranoia. > "Teaching" Einstein is a cash cow at > Universities. That's because of the numbers of gullible students who > attend, so that they can become... smart, too; and because of the > billions of dollars per year in NSF grant money, wasted, so that > Universities can... "research" anything and everything to do with SR > and GRwhich I have summarily disproved! The high and the mighty in > Universities, and their puppets at those science journals, all have > egg-on-their-faces for my having proved so much of what they have so > expounded upon to be wrong. If you would like to read technical > essays about my New Science, try any of the attached. Oh... how many > '+new posts' have YOU made? I thought, so... NoEinstein > > Where Angels Fear to Fallhttp://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_frm/thread/8152ef3e... > Last Nails in Einstein's Coffinhttp://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics..relativity/browse_frm/thre... > Pop Quiz for Science Buffs!http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_frm/thread/43f6f316... > An Einstein Disproof for Dummieshttp://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/f7a63... > Another look at Einsteinhttp://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_frm/thread/41670721... > Three Problems for Math and Sciencehttp://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/bb07f... > Matter from Thin Airhttp://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/ee4fe... > Curing Einsteins Diseasehttp://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/4ff9e... > Replicating NoEinsteins Invalidation of M-M (at sci.math)http://groups.google.com/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/d9f98526... > Cleaning Away Einsteins Mishmashhttp://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/5d847... > Dropping Einstein Like a Stonehttp://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/989e1... > Plotting the Curves of Coriolis, Einstein, and NoEinstein (is > Copyrighted.)http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/713f8... > Are Jews Destroying Objectivity in Science?http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/d4cbe... > The Gravity of Masses Doesnt Bend Light.http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/efb99... > KE = 1/2mv^2 is disproved in new falling object impact test.http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/51a85... > Light rays dont travel on ballistic curves.http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/c3d7a... > A BLACK HOLE MYTH GETS BUSTED:http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/a1702... > SR Ignored the Significance of the = Signhttp://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/56247... > Eleaticus confirms that SR has been destroyed!http://groups.google.com/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/c3cdedf3... > NoEinstein Finds Yet Another Reason Why SR Bites-the-Dust!http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/a3a12... > NoEinstein Gives the History & Rationale for Disproving Einsteinhttp://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/81046... > There is no "pull" of gravity, only the PUSH of flowing ether!http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/a8c26... > > > > > On 12 abr, 18:35, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > On Apr 11, 3:16 pm, "papar...(a)gmail.com" <papar...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Dear Miguel: If those in universities actually do experiments and.... > > > question the present state-of-the-art, how is it that no one before > > > yours truly realized that the M-M experiment didn't have a control? > > > And none of them realized that Coriolis's 1830 kinetic energy > > > equation, KE = 1/2 mc^2, and Einstein's E = mc^2 / beta, BOTH violate > > > the law of the conservation of energy?? The reason is: Those majoring > > > in physics have never understood what the hell they were being taught, > > > nor had their professors, and their professors before them. The > > > solution? FIRE at least 75% of those who teach physics, and fire > > > about 50% of those coasting through life as supposed professors > > > knowledgeable enough to... teach anyone anything at ANY university. > > > You, and they, are laughable screw-ups! NoEinstein AKA John A. > > > Armistead > > > So in which journals have your results been published? > > Which are your qualifications that allow you to so easily disqualify > > those professors? Are you, by any chance, a member of any universitary > > accreditation institution??? > > > Miguel Rios- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > >
From: NoEinstein on 13 Apr 2010 21:52 On Apr 13, 10:03 am, "papar...(a)gmail.com" <papar...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Dear Miguel: What you have just said is: You don't wish to have anything you ever wrote subject to scrutiny! Like I figured, you are a mental lightweight who hopes to 'seem' to be an intellectual, because of your supposed credentials. Put up or shut up, fellow! The Readers want to see how LITTLE you have contributed to the World of Science! NoEinstein > > On 13 abr, 09:48, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > On Apr 12, 6:59 pm, "papar...(a)gmail.com" <papar...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > Dear Miguel: Most laughable (!) science journals are affiliated with > > one or more universities. "Teaching" Einstein is a cash cow at > > Universities. That's because of the numbers of gullible students who > > attend, so that they can become... smart, too; and because of the > > billions of dollars per year in NSF grant money, wasted, so that > > Universities can... "research" anything and everything to do with SR > > and GRwhich I have summarily disproved! The high and the mighty in > > Universities, and their puppets at those science journals, all have > > egg-on-their-faces for my having proved so much of what they have so > > expounded upon to be wrong. If you would like to read technical > > essays about my New Science, try any of the attached. Oh... how many > > '+new posts' have YOU made? I thought, so... NoEinstein > > So it is crystal clear. All of your "superior intelligence" has not > been enough to get your findings to be read by anyone, and less > published not even in your own web page. > Regarding my personal research, its results are published on indexed > journals and conferences and, for sure this is not the place to > discuss them, even less when the readership of this forum involves so > many "intelligent" people, like yourself and other funny characters > like Sue, Androcles, ste, etc. > Just continue with your rantings. They are funny!!! > > Miguel Rios
From: Peter Webb on 13 Apr 2010 23:44 Special Relativity is a Jewish Conspiracy ? Its ... perfect. In its own way. Goodbye.
From: paparios on 14 Apr 2010 16:24 On 13 abr, 21:52, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > On Apr 13, 10:03 am, "papar...(a)gmail.com" <papar...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Dear Miguel: What you have just said is: You don't wish to have > anything you ever wrote subject to scrutiny! Like I figured, you are > a mental lightweight who hopes to 'seem' to be an intellectual, > because of your supposed credentials. Put up or shut up, fellow! The > Readers want to see how LITTLE you have contributed to the World of > Science! NoEinstein > > What I write about the research I do, is read and commented by my peers on the appropriate channels. This group is neither appropriate nor there are peers of mine. So why I comment here some of the nonsense written by characters like you or Seto?. Well it amuses me, while I take a break from my main research. For sure I, with several others here, am still waiting to see your so called "contribution to the world of science" whatever that may mean to you... Miguel Rios
From: spudnik on 15 Apr 2010 17:52
if energy is somehow composing/interconvertible to matter, why should matter not show effects of being accelerated toward the maximum "internal speed" of itself?... note that electricty in the wire approaches the speed of light (at least, the impulse of switching does; is that, so?) thus: what dulls the mind is not "the vacuum" or "the aether" or "the photon," mere comcepts, but the simple avoidance of the anomalies that cannot be explained by such bland theories (and their hare-brained protagonists -- tehy make far-fewer predictions or explanations, than stringtheory !-) if you can't take the heat, get out of the fryin'pan! > There is no need for an aether, and Miller's results are not > discernable from the error bars. http://www.21stcenturysciencetech.com/highlights/hilt08.html http://www.21stcenturysciencetech.com/Articles%202005/Vernadsky_W00-01.pdf |