Known physics defeated by simple puzzle?
in [Relativity]
|
From: Sam Wormley on 23 Apr 2010 01:27 On 4/22/10 8:39 PM, NoEinstein wrote: > Dear Burt: Weighing the Universe and estimating the mass are two > different things. The errant Big Bang theory would require a "center > of expansion". No Center http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/nocenter.html http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/infpoint.html Also see Ned Wright's Cosmology Tutorial http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmolog.htm http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmology_faq.html http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/CosmoCalc.html WMAP: Foundations of the Big Bang theory http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/m_uni.html WMAP: Tests of Big Bang Cosmology http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/m_uni/uni_101bbtest.html
From: BURT on 23 Apr 2010 02:10 On Apr 22, 10:27 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On 4/22/10 8:39 PM, NoEinstein wrote: > > > Dear Burt: Weighing the Universe and estimating the mass are two > > different things. The errant Big Bang theory would require a "center > > of expansion". > > No Center > http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/nocenter.html > http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/infpoint.html > > Also see Ned Wright's Cosmology Tutorial > http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmolog.htm > http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmology_faq.html > http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/CosmoCalc.html > > WMAP: Foundations of the Big Bang theory > http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/m_uni.html > > WMAP: Tests of Big Bang Cosmology > http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/m_uni/uni_101bbtest.html There is no center to the universe because it is finite yet unbounded. It is closed in the higher dimension of space. The universe is in the surface of the higher dimension and its aether. Mitch Raemsch
From: NoEinstein on 24 Apr 2010 01:47 On Apr 23, 1:27 am, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On 4/22/10 8:39 PM, NoEinstein wrote: > > > Dear Burt: Weighing the Universe and estimating the mass are two > > different things. The errant Big Bang theory would require a "center > > of expansion". > > No Center > http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/nocenter.html > http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/infpoint.html > > Also see Ned Wright's Cosmology Tutorial > http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmolog.htm > http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmology_faq.html > http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/CosmoCalc.html > > WMAP: Foundations of the Big Bang theory > http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/m_uni.html > > WMAP: Tests of Big Bang Cosmology > http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/m_uni/uni_101bbtest.html Sam WHO? NE
From: NoEinstein on 24 Apr 2010 01:49 On Apr 23, 2:10 am, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > Dear Burt: You read too much... science fiction. String theory hasn't got a thread to hang fromnor have you. NE > > On Apr 22, 10:27 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 4/22/10 8:39 PM, NoEinstein wrote: > > > > Dear Burt: Weighing the Universe and estimating the mass are two > > > different things. The errant Big Bang theory would require a "center > > > of expansion". > > > No Center > > http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/nocenter.html > > http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/infpoint.html > > > Also see Ned Wright's Cosmology Tutorial > > http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmolog.htm > > http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmology_faq.html > > http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/CosmoCalc.html > > > WMAP: Foundations of the Big Bang theory > > http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/m_uni.html > > > WMAP: Tests of Big Bang Cosmology > > http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/m_uni/uni_101bbtest.html > > There is no center to the universe because it is finite yet unbounded. > It is closed in the higher dimension of space. The universe is in the > surface of the higher dimension and its aether. > > Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
From: BURT on 24 Apr 2010 15:37
By boundless I mean round geometry the curves back on itself in the form of an universal hypersphere form. Distance is closed in that way. The higher dimension and its aether closes the universe. Mitch Raemsch |