Known physics defeated by simple puzzle?
in [Relativity]
|
From: artful on 20 Apr 2010 22:42 On Apr 21, 7:11 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > On Apr 19, 4:31 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > Dear Readers: There are a few additional contributions which I've > made to science Nope > not the least of which is my figuring out that > Newton's Law of Universal (sic) Gravitation, isn't universal at all. > His huge error? He never realized that gravity is proportional to the > amount of ether that can flow 'down' per unit of the object's mass; > and the downward ether flow will be greater for very HOT bodies that > emit more light. So, bright stars will have much more gravity than, > say, cold planets. And your evidence for this nonsense ?? > The consequences of his error: There is an > approximate 10 fold over-estimate of the mass of the universe (and > galaxies), and an approximate ten fold UNDER-ESTIMATE of the gravity > of star systems. Those two, combined, will account for ALL of the > supposed "missing mass"... that has wasted close to a trillion dollars > trying to... find. Unfortunately, the primary 'mission' of science is > to find nonsense justifications Sounds like your mission > for spending research money that's > provided by the naive taxpayers and 'foundations'. If supposed > scientists only had the ability to REASON, there would be a lot fewer > absurd experiments being financed and run! NoEinstein
From: NoEinstein on 22 Apr 2010 16:17 On Apr 20, 9:13 pm, xxein <xx...(a)comcast.net> wrote: > Dear xxein: What don't you understand? Close to 100% of my New Science developed from LOGIC and clear reasoning. Those are the best sequiturs I know! NoEinstein > > On Apr 20, 5:11 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > On Apr 19, 4:31 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > Dear Readers: There are a few additional contributions which I've > > made to sciencenot the least of which is my figuring out that > > Newton's Law of Universal (sic) Gravitation, isn't universal at all. > > His huge error? He never realized that gravity is proportional to the > > amount of ether that can flow 'down' per unit of the object's mass; > > and the downward ether flow will be greater for very HOT bodies that > > emit more light. So, bright stars will have much more gravity than, > > say, cold planets. The consequences of his error: There is an > > approximate 10 fold over-estimate of the mass of the universe (and > > galaxies), and an approximate ten fold UNDER-ESTIMATE of the gravity > > of star systems. Those two, combined, will account for ALL of the > > supposed "missing mass"... that has wasted close to a trillion dollars > > trying to... find. Unfortunately, the primary 'mission' of science is > > to find nonsense justifications for spending research money that's > > provided by the naive taxpayers and 'foundations'. If supposed > > scientists only had the ability to REASON, there would be a lot fewer > > absurd experiments being financed and run! NoEinstein > > xxein: Sorry. Still non sequitur.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
From: NoEinstein on 22 Apr 2010 16:22 On Apr 20, 10:42 pm, artful <artful...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > Dear "late-comer" artful: Follow my thread. I've explained your 'evidence' dozens of times. Do us all a favor and list your own '+new posts'. Mine are copied, below. NoEinstein Where Angels Fear to Fall http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_frm/thread/8152ef3e... Last Nails in Einstein's Coffin http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/browse_frm/thre... Pop Quiz for Science Buffs! http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_frm/thread/43f6f316... An Einstein Disproof for Dummies http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/f7a63... Another look at Einstein http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_frm/thread/41670721... Three Problems for Math and Science http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/bb07f30aab43c49c?hl=en Matter from Thin Air http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/ee4fe3946dfc0c31/1f1872476bc6ca90?hl=en#1f1872476bc6ca90 Curing Einsteins Disease http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/4ff9e866e0d87562/f5f848ad8aba67da?hl=en#f5f848ad8aba67da Replicating NoEinsteins Invalidation of M-M (at sci.math) http://groups.google.com/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/d9f9852639d5d9e1/dcb2a1511b7b2603?hl=en&lnk=st&q=#dcb2a1511b7b2603 Cleaning Away Einsteins Mishmash http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/5d847a9cb50de7f0/739aef0aee462d26?hl=en&lnk=st&q=#739aef0aee462d26 Dropping Einstein Like a Stone http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/989e16c59967db2b?hl=en# Plotting the Curves of Coriolis, Einstein, and NoEinstein (is Copyrighted.) http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/713f8a62f17f8274?hl=en# Are Jews Destroying Objectivity in Science? http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/d4cbe8182fae7008/b93ba4268d0f33e0?hl=en&lnk=st&q=#b93ba4268d0f33e0 The Gravity of Masses Doesnt Bend Light. http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/efb99ab95e498420/cd29d832240f404d?hl=en#cd29d832240f404d KE = 1/2mv^2 is disproved in new falling object impact test. http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/51a85ff75de414c2?hl=en&q= Light rays dont travel on ballistic curves. http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/c3d7a4e9937ab73e/c7d941d2b2e80002?hl=en#c7d941d2b2e80002 A BLACK HOLE MYTH GETS BUSTED: http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/a170212ca4c36218?hl=en# SR Ignored the Significance of the = Sign http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/562477d4848ea45a/92bccf5550412817?hl=en#92bccf5550412817 Eleaticus confirms that SR has been destroyed! http://groups.google.com/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/c3cdedf38e749bfd/0451e93207ee475a?hl=en#0451e93207ee475a NoEinstein Finds Yet Another Reason Why SR Bites-the-Dust! http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/a3a12d4d732435f2/737ef57bf0ed3849?hl=en#737ef57bf0ed3849 NoEinstein Gives the History & Rationale for Disproving Einstein http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/81046d3d070cffe4/f1d7fbe994f569f7?hl=en#f1d7fbe994f569f7 There is no "pull" of gravity, only the PUSH of flowing ether! http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/a8c26d2eb535ab8/efdbea7b0272072f?hl=en& > > On Apr 21, 7:11 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > On Apr 19, 4:31 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > Dear Readers: There are a few additional contributions which I've > > made to science > > Nope > > > not the least of which is my figuring out that > > Newton's Law of Universal (sic) Gravitation, isn't universal at all. > > His huge error? He never realized that gravity is proportional to the > > amount of ether that can flow 'down' per unit of the object's mass; > > and the downward ether flow will be greater for very HOT bodies that > > emit more light. So, bright stars will have much more gravity than, > > say, cold planets. > > And your evidence for this nonsense ?? > > > The consequences of his error: There is an > > approximate 10 fold over-estimate of the mass of the universe (and > > galaxies), and an approximate ten fold UNDER-ESTIMATE of the gravity > > of star systems. Those two, combined, will account for ALL of the > > supposed "missing mass"... that has wasted close to a trillion dollars > > trying to... find. Unfortunately, the primary 'mission' of science is > > to find nonsense justifications > > Sounds like your mission > > > > > for spending research money that's > > provided by the naive taxpayers and 'foundations'. If supposed > > scientists only had the ability to REASON, there would be a lot fewer > > absurd experiments being financed and run! NoEinstein - Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
From: spudnik on 22 Apr 2010 19:41 that formula was not from Coriolis; it was Leibniz's "vis viva," where, before, hacks like Galileo didn't use the second powering of the velocity. thus: aren't you referring to Maxwell's Demon, a merely thought experiment. yes, "preactically," there is no vacuum -- just get Pascal to see that! well, you seem to really believe in your tiny theory, interestingly; it just doesn't go any where. > The mechanism by which vacuum chambers can get out the > matter isn't the power of the suction, it is the random motion of the > individual atoms that remain inside the chambers, AND the > functionality of the valve that keeps the evacuated matter out. > Practically speaking, there is no 'perfect' vacuum. Interestingly, thus: as the only known (to me) student of Bucky, I say, he was Are Buckafka Fullofit on pi ... but, dood, do you know the surfer's value?... it's not in _Synergetics_: http://www.rwgrayprojects.com/synergetics/synergetics.html > Bucky Fuller explained that nature doesn't think pi is 3.1416... thus: this reminds me of the old Ultraviolet Catastrophe, when you take Hubble's opinion about the redshift, being directly related to speeding-away ... and there is no antilight; only antimatter. what lies within the visible universe is still very, very hard to elaborate, at very high redshifts, but there are plenty of goofy theories. thus: unfortuantely for Olber, almost all of Universe is red- shifted out of visible spectra, including most blue- shifters, due supposedly to Hubble's being hounded into saying that the shift is "Dopplerian." thus: the main, supposedly unsolved anomaly is that the winters & nights are "warmer" than the days and summers. now, how on Earth could that, be? the problem is that, although the GCMs are frought with nearly irreducible uncertainties re clouds & vapor, virtually all of the changes that effect these are made by men on land; whereas the hydro cycle at sea is some- what more of a constant. that's why, they call it, the Anthropocene (viz, the typical passive solar take on the urban heat islands, and the UNIPCC's supposed fudge-factor to cover them, which never seems to come-up in the actual articles in the actual journals). thus: R. Bucky Fuller was a funny guy, and your spiel about orbit is a perfect counter to his blather about pi. on the other hand, the vast majority of earth scientists don't know spherical trig., which Bucky did, in the command of a naval vessel, just before radio came in (in their GCMs etc., the poles are singularities, as in a Mercator projection ... but the space-science folks are *all* about the poles .-) see color plates one & two in _Synergetics_. http://www.rwgrayprojects.com/synergetics/synergetics.html thus: space-time is merely ordinary phase-space, properly seen, a la Lanczos' use of quaternions -- Death to the lightcone; long-live the lightcone-heads! so, are biquaternions non-associative, like octonions? poor Minkowski, made his bizzare slogan about time *qua* the graphed *function* on a piece of paper, and then he died, and that ain't electronics *or* rocketscience (like Bucky saith, It is *all* rocketscience .-) the great geometer Minkowski, alas, puts his pants on, one lightcone at a time, like any one else. --No Cap and Trade Bailout for Wall Street and The City! to whom it concerns; as I comprehend it, after briefly speaking with Waxman at UCLA, his bill does the same as his '91 cap&trade bill under HW, on SO2 and NOx (viz, acid rain); that is, it is just a nostrum of "frere trade." if Dubya had known that Kyoto was just another cap&trade "free trade" nostrum, he'd have signed it, since he has been thoroughly indoctrinated in the MBA school on "British Liberal Free Trade" (cotton, sugar & slavery, why the British organized and supported Secession with ships & materiel) -- what the Revolution was about -- not just, Taxation without representation, a la the Tea Party effetes and the Encyclopedia Brittaninca! Waxman perhaps has been too long on the job; when I spoke to him at the Faculty Center, he seemed to be on drugs, a marked difference form when I saw him in P.Palisades. anyway, as I asked him, Why can't we just have a very small Carbon Tax, instead of letting the arbitrageurs run the bull & bear hijinx? as they say, the bears make money, the bulls make money, and the hogs always get slaughtered. none of the (two) experts, I have read or asked, thought that a tax wouldn't work as well, just that it was somehow politically impossible. --sooner,bri
From: NoEinstein on 22 Apr 2010 21:04
On Apr 20, 10:42 pm, artful <artful...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > On Apr 21, 7:11 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > On Apr 19, 4:31 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > Dear Readers: There are a few additional contributions which I've > > made to science > > Nope > > > not the least of which is my figuring out that > > Newton's Law of Universal (sic) Gravitation, isn't universal at all. > > His huge error? He never realized that gravity is proportional to the > > amount of ether that can flow 'down' per unit of the object's mass; > > and the downward ether flow will be greater for very HOT bodies that > > emit more light. So, bright stars will have much more gravity than, > > say, cold planets. > > And your evidence for this nonsense ?? > > > The consequences of his error: There is an > > approximate 10 fold over-estimate of the mass of the universe (and > > galaxies), and an approximate ten fold UNDER-ESTIMATE of the gravity > > of star systems. Those two, combined, will account for ALL of the > > supposed "missing mass"... that has wasted close to a trillion dollars > > trying to... find. Unfortunately, the primary 'mission' of science is > > to find nonsense justifications > > Sounds like your mission > > > > > for spending research money that's > > provided by the naive taxpayers and 'foundations'. If supposed > > scientists only had the ability to REASON, there would be a lot fewer > > absurd experiments being financed and run! NoEinstein - Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Dear Artful: Saying "nope" to me is like saying no to the rain falling from the clouds. Your standards of what is what is only the status quo garbageproving that you lack both reasoning ability and intelligence. Instead of simply disagreeing, take any one point from my many posts, or my replies on those; paraphrase why you think I err; and I will shoot you down. Not a SOUL has proved me wrong, or even half tried. But you can give that your best shot. NoEinstein |