Known physics defeated by simple puzzle?
in [Relativity]
|
From: paparios on 16 Apr 2010 11:46 On 15 abr, 18:17, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > On Apr 14, 4:24 pm, "papar...(a)gmail.com" <papar...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Dear Miguel: ...Once again: You've done nothing worthy of being shown > to your superiors, here. Your "peers" never made it out of > kindergarten! NoEinstein Again, where are your written proofs of SR and GR being wrong published?. You have only provided links to group discussion threads. You have nothing of a sort of a proof written on those links. Miguel Rios
From: spudnik on 16 Apr 2010 17:00 do you assume that the Swiss Cheese Voids are the same as Pascal's "perfect" vacuum?... I don't get it; you are going around in circles about "the phtoton that needs no medium according to herr doktor- professor E., and an aether for the waves to do so ... so much for your grand dyscoveries, if you cannot make one "unique experiment" that shows that they do a God-am thing. > Dear Spudnik: The dictionary defines corpuscle as a small 'particle', > not a wave. No particle should ever require a medium. Because light > can travel off of the line-of-sight at slits, that fact was wrongly > presumed to be because there was a 'water-like or air-like' medium > that can form ripples. But light can travel perfectly well through > the Swiss Cheese voids between the galaxies, that have been scavenged > of ether for building the stars and the galaxies. So, light does NOT > require a medium! Light is small, evenly spaced (for each color) > packets of IOTAs too small to qualify as matter, but able to transfer > some ether away from the more massive areas. Without that transfer, > the ether which flows DOWN as gravity would soon stop. The Black Hole > at the center of Andromeda proves that process, because the gravity > SHUT OFF when the massive star went blacknothing out, means nothing > in! The shut-off of the central gravity caused the stars that were > about to be sucked into the larger star, to fly off on their > tangents. That left a gap in the star distribution next to the > center, right where the stars should be most dense. These are part of > my broad contribution to the New Science. NoEinstein thus: quaternions *are* vector mechanics, with inner & outer products in one operation (terminology all due to Hamilton; Gibbs seperated the two ops., to give what is refered to as vector mechanics). > Fine. Quaternions are useful. I get rotations. --Light: A History! http://wlym.com http://21stcenturysciencetech.com
From: spudnik on 16 Apr 2010 17:05 you are being really silly, or dense. all of wave phenomena demonstrate a doppler shift of frequencies, not speeds. of course, M&M did have a reference beam, or they wouldn't have pioneered interferometry. sheesh; get a grip & ditch the googolplex & re-do the "9g. algebra!" > Dear Spudnik: All photons are EMITTED at the speed of light, 'c'. > But the velocity of the source adds to or subtracts from that > velocity. Sound emitted by a moving source will elevate in pitch > approaching, and fall in pitch, going away. If a baseball is thrown > from the bow of a speedboat, the ball and the boat speed add. It the > same person pitches the ball from the stern of the boat, the speed of > the boat subtracts from the speed of the ball. Using that same > logical assumption for light, I determined that the M-M experiment > didn't have a CONTROL light course. Using simple 9th grade algebra, I > verified that the total circuit time of all emitted photons in M-M > never varies regardless of the orientation of the apparatus, and the > velocity of the Earth. http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_frm/thread/8152ef3e... Albert Einstein - Revue "Science", 1925 "Si les observations du Dr Miller étaient confirmées, la théorie de la relativité serait en défaut. L'expérience est le juge suprème". http://allais.maurice.free.fr/Paradoxe.htm thus: do you assume that the Swiss Cheese Voids are the same as Pascal's "perfect" vacuum?... I don't get it; you are going around in circles about "the phtoton that needs no medium according to herr doktor- professor E., and an aether for the waves to do so ... so much for your grand dyscoveries, if you cannot make one "unique experiment" that shows that they do a God-am thing. > Dear Spudnik: The dictionary defines corpuscle as a small 'particle', > not a wave. No particle should ever require a medium. Because light > can travel off of the line-of-sight at slits, that fact was wrongly > presumed to be because there was a 'water-like or air-like' medium > that can form ripples. But light can travel perfectly well through > the Swiss Cheese voids between the galaxies, that have been scavenged > of ether for building the stars and the galaxies. So, light does NOT > require a medium! Light is small, evenly spaced (for each color) > packets of IOTAs too small to qualify as matter, but able to transfer > some ether away from the more massive areas. Without that transfer, > the ether which flows DOWN as gravity would soon stop. The Black Hole > at the center of Andromeda proves that process, because the gravity > SHUT OFF when the massive star went blacknothing out, means nothing > in! The shut-off of the central gravity caused the stars that were > about to be sucked into the larger star, to fly off on their > tangents. That left a gap in the star distribution next to the > center, right where the stars should be most dense. These are part of > my broad contribution to the New Science. NoEinstein thus: quaternions *are* vector mechanics, with inner & outer products in one operation (terminology all due to Hamilton; Gibbs seperated the two ops., to give what is refered to as vector mechanics). > Fine. Quaternions are useful. I get rotations. --Light: A History! http://wlym.com http://21stcenturysciencetech.com
From: NoEinstein on 17 Apr 2010 00:24 On Apr 16, 11:46 am, "papar...(a)gmail.com" <papar...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On 15 abr, 18:17, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > On Apr 14, 4:24 pm, "papar...(a)gmail.com" <papar...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > Dear Miguel: ...Once again: You've done nothing worthy of being shown > > to your superiors, here. Your "peers" never made it out of > > kindergarten! NoEinstein > > Again, where are your written proofs of SR and GR being wrong > published?. You have only provided links to group discussion threads. > You have nothing of a sort of a proof written on those links. > > Miguel Rios Dear Freak: My clearly explained New Science is in the links, below, which I myself wrote. To date, no one has shown that any point in any one of those is wrong. Neither can you. NoEinstein Where Angels Fear to Fall http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_frm/thread/8152ef3e... Last Nails in Einstein's Coffin http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/browse_frm/thre... Pop Quiz for Science Buffs! http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_frm/thread/43f6f316... An Einstein Disproof for Dummies http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/f7a63... Another look at Einstein http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_frm/thread/41670721... Three Problems for Math and Science http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/bb07f30aab43c49c?hl=en Matter from Thin Air http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/ee4fe3946dfc0c31/1f1872476bc6ca90?hl=en#1f1872476bc6ca90 Curing Einsteins Disease http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/4ff9e866e0d87562/f5f848ad8aba67da?hl=en#f5f848ad8aba67da Replicating NoEinsteins Invalidation of M-M (at sci.math) http://groups.google.com/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/d9f9852639d5d9e1/dcb2a1511b7b2603?hl=en&lnk=st&q=#dcb2a1511b7b2603 Cleaning Away Einsteins Mishmash http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/5d847a9cb50de7f0/739aef0aee462d26?hl=en&lnk=st&q=#739aef0aee462d26 Dropping Einstein Like a Stone http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/989e16c59967db2b?hl=en# Plotting the Curves of Coriolis, Einstein, and NoEinstein (is Copyrighted.) http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/713f8a62f17f8274?hl=en# Are Jews Destroying Objectivity in Science? http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/d4cbe8182fae7008/b93ba4268d0f33e0?hl=en&lnk=st&q=#b93ba4268d0f33e0 The Gravity of Masses Doesnt Bend Light. http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/efb99ab95e498420/cd29d832240f404d?hl=en#cd29d832240f404d KE = 1/2mv^2 is disproved in new falling object impact test. http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/51a85ff75de414c2?hl=en&q= Light rays dont travel on ballistic curves. http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/c3d7a4e9937ab73e/c7d941d2b2e80002?hl=en#c7d941d2b2e80002 A BLACK HOLE MYTH GETS BUSTED: http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/a170212ca4c36218?hl=en# SR Ignored the Significance of the = Sign http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/562477d4848ea45a/92bccf5550412817?hl=en#92bccf5550412817 Eleaticus confirms that SR has been destroyed! http://groups.google.com/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/c3cdedf38e749bfd/0451e93207ee475a?hl=en#0451e93207ee475a NoEinstein Finds Yet Another Reason Why SR Bites-the-Dust! http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/a3a12d4d732435f2/737ef57bf0ed3849?hl=en#737ef57bf0ed3849 NoEinstein Gives the History & Rationale for Disproving Einstein http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/81046d3d070cffe4/f1d7fbe994f569f7?hl=en#f1d7fbe994f569f7 There is no "pull" of gravity, only the PUSH of flowing ether! http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/a8c26d2eb535ab8/efdbea7b0272072f?hl=en&
From: NoEinstein on 17 Apr 2010 00:42
On Apr 16, 5:00 pm, spudnik <Space...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > Dear spudnik: Your loss of composure is indicative that you have been bested. Because the Swiss Cheese voids are between all galaxies, then, light could only get to us by passing through those voids about 1/2 the total time of travel. If there is no matter in the voids, and little if any ether, then, I suppose, you could say that makes a near perfect vacuum. Logic tells me that the Swiss Cheese (not worm holes) is the best path of travel across the universe. And since there is no drag force from the ether, then, there would be no time dilation. The trick for those spaceships would be to create an artificial ether flow matching the flow on Earth (or...) so there can be an artificial gravity. "Captain Kirk" and his crew walked around perfectly naturally inside their spaceship... didn't they? NoEinstein > > do you assume that the Swiss Cheese Voids are the same > as Pascal's "perfect" vacuum?... I don't get it; > you are going around in circles about "the phtoton > that needs no medium according to herr doktor- > professor E., and an aether for the waves to do so ... > so much for your grand dyscoveries, if > you cannot make one "unique experiment" that shows > that they do a God-am thing. > > > > > > > Dear Spudnik: The dictionary defines corpuscle as a small 'particle', > > not a wave. No particle should ever require a medium. Because light > > can travel off of the line-of-sight at slits, that fact was wrongly > > presumed to be because there was a 'water-like or air-like' medium > > that can form ripples. But light can travel perfectly well through > > the Swiss Cheese voids between the galaxies, that have been scavenged > > of ether for building the stars and the galaxies. So, light does NOT > > require a medium! Light is small, evenly spaced (for each color) > > packets of IOTAs too small to qualify as matter, but able to transfer > > some ether away from the more massive areas. Without that transfer, > > the ether which flows DOWN as gravity would soon stop. The Black Hole > > at the center of Andromeda proves that process, because the gravity > > SHUT OFF when the massive star went blacknothing out, means nothing > > in! The shut-off of the central gravity caused the stars that were > > about to be sucked into the larger star, to fly off on their > > tangents. That left a gap in the star distribution next to the > > center, right where the stars should be most dense. These are part of > > my broad contribution to the New Science. NoEinstein > > thus: > quaternions *are* vector mechanics, > with inner & outer products in one operation > (terminology all due to Hamilton; > Gibbs seperated the two ops., > to give what is refered to as vector mechanics). > > > Fine. Quaternions are useful. I get rotations. > > --Light: A History!http://wlym.comhttp://21stcenturysciencetech.com- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - |