Prev: Standard Model In Trouble
Next: Unanimous proof LHC is Revelation's Great Mystery
From: guskz on 15 Jun 2010 12:12
On Jun 14, 1:15 pm, Raymond Yohros <b...(a)birdband.net> wrote:
> On Jun 4, 11:26 pm, "gu...(a)hotmail.com" <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Europe's LHC will create a Black Hole.
>
> in a totally controlled high vacuum detector chamber.
> black holes need to feed on mass to sustain themselfs
> just like hurricanes feed on hot water.
>

?? yes but is charge energy, and if it be energy is it mass E=mc^2,
and likewise food?


> the lhc is one of the best machines ever made (if not d best)
> it is worth every penny and it will answer a huge load
> of questions that will end up saving us.
>
> so dont be paranoid and embrace the future!
>
> r.y

From: guskz on 15 Jun 2010 12:13
On Jun 14, 7:00 pm, Darwin123 <drosen0...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Jun 5, 12:26 am, "gu...(a)hotmail.com" <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > When protons or matter travel &/or collide at 99.99% of light speed,
> > relativistic space contracts to a near-singularity.
>
> > LHC will-not/cannot observe the entire amount of new particles created
> > &/or colliding in the tiny near-singularity space.
>
> > LHC shut down their collider as a result of the new particles but LHC
> > only noticed a tiny fraction of them.
>
> > The rest remained hidden in the near-singularity contracted space.
> > Lest it be a lie and space doesn't contract to near singularity at
> > near light speed making Einstein a fool.
>
> > Europe's LHC will create a Black Hole.
>
>        Here in the Western hemisphere, most of us are too busy
> watching the Gulf oil spill "crisis" to worry about "a near-
> singularity contracted space".
>      Unless those "black holes" you predict are connected to the
> petroleum in some way. That gulf spill happened soon after the LHC. Do
> you suppose there was some connection |:-)

If it weren't for the spill, the money would go towards their
dividends, instead of cheap gas at the pump.
From: guskz on 15 Jun 2010 12:16
On Jun 15, 8:05 am, funkenstein <luke.s...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jun 5, 6:19 pm, Uncle Al <Uncle...(a)hate.spam.net> wrote:
>
> > "gu...(a)hotmail.com" wrote:
>
> > > When protons or matter travel &/or collide at 99.99% of light speed,
> > > relativistic space contracts to a near-singularity.
>
> > > LHC will-not/cannot observe the entire amount of new particles created
> > > &/or colliding in the tiny near-singularity space.
>
> >   1) Cosmic rays.
> >   2) Neurinos.
> >   3) idiot
>
> I was happy with 1) and 3).   How does 2) fit in?

hey there with the 3.

And He's the #3 who still hasn't proven it's with atmospheric cosmic
rays.

All his divine links lead to laboratory experiments, shows half the
intelligence and what I wrote is still correct.
From: Raymond Yohros on 15 Jun 2010 12:32
On Jun 15, 11:12 am, "gu...(a)hotmail.com" <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Jun 14, 1:15 pm, Raymond Yohros <b...(a)birdband.net> wrote:
>
> > On Jun 4, 11:26 pm, "gu...(a)hotmail.com" <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > Europe's LHC will create a Black Hole.
>
> > in a totally controlled high vacuum detector chamber.
> > black holes need to feed on mass to sustain themselfs
> > just like hurricanes feed on hot water.
>
> ?? yes but is charge energy, and if it be energy is it mass E=mc^2,
> and likewise food?
>

it will only last a fraction of a second. safe and good enough to
make some great readings!

r.y

From: guskz on 15 Jun 2010 16:53
On Jun 15, 12:32 pm, Raymond Yohros <b...(a)birdband.net> wrote:
> On Jun 15, 11:12 am, "gu...(a)hotmail.com" <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Jun 14, 1:15 pm, Raymond Yohros <b...(a)birdband.net> wrote:
>
> > > On Jun 4, 11:26 pm, "gu...(a)hotmail.com" <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > Europe's LHC will create a Black Hole.
>
> > > in a totally controlled high vacuum detector chamber.
> > > black holes need to feed on mass to sustain themselfs
> > > just like hurricanes feed on hot water.
>
> > ?? yes but is charge energy, and if it be energy is it mass E=mc^2,
> > and likewise food?
>
> it will only last a fraction of a second. safe and good enough to
> make some great readings!
>
> r.y

Yes but you still didn't answer is charge energy thus food? charge
does not last for a fraction of a second.
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5
Prev: Standard Model In Trouble
Next: Unanimous proof LHC is Revelation's Great Mystery