From: funkenstein on
On Jun 15, 6:16 pm, "gu...(a)hotmail.com" <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Jun 15, 8:05 am,funkenstein<luke.s...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Jun 5, 6:19 pm, Uncle Al <Uncle...(a)hate.spam.net> wrote:
>
> > > "gu...(a)hotmail.com" wrote:
>
> > > > When protons or matter travel &/or collide at 99.99% of light speed,
> > > > relativistic space contracts to a near-singularity.
>
> > > > LHC will-not/cannot observe the entire amount of new particles created
> > > > &/or colliding in the tiny near-singularity space.
>
> > >   1) Cosmic rays.
> > >   2) Neurinos.
> > >   3) idiot
>
> > I was happy with 1) and 3).   How does 2) fit in?
>
> hey there with the 3.
>
> And He's the #3 who still hasn't proven it's with atmospheric cosmic
> rays.
>
> All his divine links lead to laboratory experiments, shows half the
> intelligence and what I wrote is still correct.


OK, perhaps the LHC will create something like a black hole,
but you must acknowledge that these things are occurring every day in
the atmosphere, only the LHC has the detectors in place to analyze
what exactly is happening.


From: guskz on
On Jun 24, 9:48 am, funkenstein <luke.s...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jun 15, 6:16 pm, "gu...(a)hotmail.com" <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jun 15, 8:05 am,funkenstein<luke.s...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Jun 5, 6:19 pm, Uncle Al <Uncle...(a)hate.spam.net> wrote:
>
> > > > "gu...(a)hotmail.com" wrote:
>
> > > > > When protons or matter travel &/or collide at 99.99% of light speed,
> > > > > relativistic space contracts to a near-singularity.
>
> > > > > LHC will-not/cannot observe the entire amount of new particles created
> > > > > &/or colliding in the tiny near-singularity space.
>
> > > >   1) Cosmic rays.
> > > >   2) Neurinos.
> > > >   3) idiot
>
> > > I was happy with 1) and 3).   How does 2) fit in?
>
> > hey there with the 3.
>
> > And He's the #3 who still hasn't proven it's with atmospheric cosmic
> > rays.
>
> > All his divine links lead to laboratory experiments, shows half the
> > intelligence and what I wrote is still correct.
>
> OK, perhaps the LHC will create something like a black hole,
> but you must acknowledge that these things are occurring every day in
> the atmosphere, only the LHC has the detectors in place to analyze
> what exactly is happening.

You see objects, but you don't see the photon.

Likewise their detectors translate what they believe is
occurring....by the amount of deviation that occurs in their
detectors. Through the momentum and amount of deviation from the
energy stream helps them calculate & thus estimate the mass and
velocity of mass.

10^17 eV cosmic ray simulation creates 14 TeV particles.

They believe they observe 10^20 eV from cosmic rays, yet other
formulas say it's impossible for cosmic rays to produce 10^20 eV.
Similarly Hawking formulas say it's impossible for LHC to produce
black holes.

Ever play pool...sometimes the cue balls causes two or more balls to
move & remain stuck together after collision....hence perhaps the
10^20 eV...but in no way the same density (all three balls the size of
one ball) to produce a black hole.