First  |  Prev |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75
deriving speed of light out of just pure mathematics; 2nd attempt #581 Correcting Math
Archimedes Plutonium wrote: --- quoting from --- http://www.mathpages.com/home/kmath502/kmath502.htm This curve on the surface of a sphere is sometimes called a loxodrome, rhumb line, or spherical helix. A path beginning on the equator and maintaining a constant heading of K=0.2 is shown in the fi... 9 Apr 2010 15:38
Special Relativity is merely circumference/diameter Re: deriving speed of light out of just pure mathematics; 2nd attempt #577 Correcting Math
Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes(a)gmail.com> writes: But I suppose the Atom Totality theory can use 22^(22*22) which is 22^484 and is close to the 10^500 of the Planck unit of Coulomb Interactions inside element 109. Unless I made a stupid error, 22^484 is closer to 10^650. That's not very clos... 9 Apr 2010 15:38
deriving speed of light out of just pure mathematics; 2nd attempt #580 Correcting Math
--- quoting from --- http://www.mathpages.com/home/kmath502/kmath502.htm This curve on the surface of a sphere is sometimes called a loxodrome, rhumb line, or spherical helix. A path beginning on the equator and maintaining a constant heading of K=0.2 is shown in the figure below. --- end quoting --- Trouble ... 9 Apr 2010 14:31
Sometimes when you embrace the impossible you discover truth.
One man once speculated one out of every ten times we embrace the impossible we discover truth. I imagine this means sometimes less then 10% of the time we embrace the impossible do we discover something new, and I imagine this also means sometimes more then 10% of the time when we temper our disbelief and go again... 9 Apr 2010 11:09
deriving speed of light out of just pure mathematics; 2nd attempt #578 Correcting Math
Archimedes Plutonium wrote: So if proton to electron mass ratio is 6(pi^5) and inverse fine structure constant is (pi^7)/22, then 22^22 must have some physical significance also, and related to the speed of light. Now there is a Planck length of around 1.6 x 10^-35 meters. So I need s... 9 Apr 2010 03:27
Special Relativity is merely circumference/diameter Re: deriving speed of light out of just pure mathematics; 2nd attempt #577 Correcting Math
Archimedes Plutonium wrote: (snipped) More tonight. P.S. Also, I have been asking for some confirmation that Planck's unit of 10^500 for the Coulomb Interactions is related to the speed of light. I have been asking for some confirmation, and I finally have it. In the Plutonium Atom Total... 9 Apr 2010 03:27
CHAMBER POT
Pentcho Valev wrote: http://www.prospect-magazine.co.uk/article_details.php?id=5538 Paul Davies: "Was Einstein wrong? Einstein's famous equation E=mc2 is the only scientific formula known to just about everyone. The "c" here stands for the speed of light. It is one of the most fundamental of the basic co... 9 Apr 2010 02:21
# Miscellaneous number theory functions
# Miscellaneous number theory functions function IsNthPower(m,n) = ( if IsMatrix (m) or IsMatrix (n) then return ApplyOverMatrix2 (m, n, IsNthPower) else if not IsRational (m) then # Only integers/rationals can be perfect powers false else if n == 2 then IsPerfectSquare(m) else if not IsPerfe... 8 Apr 2010 16:19
Special Relativity is merely circumference/diameter Re: deriving speed of light out of just pure mathematics; 2nd attempt #576 Correcting Math
Archimedes Plutonium wrote: Alright, I admit the 1st attempt was botched, so maybe this 2nd attempt will gain some I do not know if there is a real english word for botched or whether it be called "blotched". But it is good use in this context. In this 2nd attempt I iron out the mistakes of the 1st. ... 8 Apr 2010 15:11
First  |  Prev |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75