Prev: CMenu class and menu object
Next: need some class help
From: Ajay Kalra on 22 Feb 2010 11:08 > http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/forums/en-US/vcgeneral/threads/ I always thought that was just another view of the usenet groups. I never bothered. -- Ajay
From: RFOG on 22 Feb 2010 11:12 But you need to think that 99,9% of actual devices have a processor and it is done in C or C++. Think in washing machines, parkings, medical machines, tv, video, players... practically all modern gadgets and electrical appliances have at leas one processor into them, and those processors cannot be programmed in .NET or other non C languages. PS: Congrats, Joseph and Mike! On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 17:05:04 +0100, Ajay Kalra <ajaykalra(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On Feb 22, 10:54 am, Joseph M. Newcomer <newco...(a)flounder.com> wrote: >> There are more VC++ developers than VB or C#. Again, unclassified >> industry data. >> (Actually, this surprised me, because about ten years ago, the balance >> was quite >> different). > > That doesnt sound right. I believe VB developers easily surpassed C++ > 10 years ago. I would be surprised if thats not the case with C# > today. Where I work now (and for last 5+ years), we have gone from > 100% C++ to less than 30% C++. GUI is completely out of C++ and has > been for many years. > > -- > Ajay > > > -- Microsoft Visual C++ MVP => http://geeks.ms/blogs/rfog ======================================== Las paredes tienen o�dos. Vuestros o�dos tienen paredes. -- An�nimo.
From: Ajay Kalra on 22 Feb 2010 11:11 > A very big rock... > > Scott has given you the link to the vcgeneral forum. There are also > > http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/forums/en-US/vclanguage/threads/ > > http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/Vsexpressvc/threads Thanks. -- Ajay
From: Ajay Kalra on 22 Feb 2010 11:29 On Feb 22, 11:12 am, RFOG <n...(a)mail.com> wrote: > But you need to think that 99,9% of actual devices have a processor and it > is done in C or C++. Think in washing machines, parkings, medical > machines, tv, video, players... practically all modern gadgets and > electrical appliances have at leas one processor into them, and those > processors cannot be programmed in .NET or other non C languages. > I wasnt questioning that at all. I am talking about number of developers. What you said has been true forever and other languages did take the lead over C++. -- Ajay
From: David Lowndes on 22 Feb 2010 11:40
>That doesnt sound right. I believe VB developers easily surpassed C++ >10 years ago. I would be surprised if thats not the case with C# >today. Where I work now (and for last 5+ years), we have gone from >100% C++ to less than 30% C++. GUI is completely out of C++ and has >been for many years. It surely all depends where these magic figures are coming from :) Dave |