MagicJack
in [Freeware]
|
Prev: Wanted: Portable eBook reader
Next: Regarding Freeware
From: Corinto on 26 Feb 2010 01:05 In article <hm78s0$7da$1(a)news.mixmin.net> Kanero <kanero(a)domain.invalid> wrote: > > Flush.
From: "Lew" Drafted#54 on 26 Feb 2010 02:18 "No Spam" <nospam(a)nospam.nospam> wrote in message news:0bmeo5htahhf0mg8bbbv5h310lj4dmikmi(a)4ax.com... >>Haters?? No one hates you. We pity you and wish you could get the mental >>help you so badly need. >>Mental illness is a serious disease Barry. Please seek help. >> > > I never met "Bear Bottoms" and don't want to pick sides on this but, > reading this thread, and all the anonymous remailer flames, it seems to > me that you people are the ones with mental illness called obsession. > Interesting how you took sides anyway. Im not using an anonymous remailer. Before you make ignorant judgements you ought to do a bit of research. Lew
From: Franklin on 26 Feb 2010 08:19 Nomen Nescio wrote: > Bear Bottoms wrote: > >> Nomen Nescio <nobody(a)dizum.com> wrote in >> news:bd4b260190f8b56be3fa999d3abd0030(a)dizum.com: >> >>> You should really think about that Bottoms. It's long past time for a >>> bit of honest introspection. >>> >>> Or is it just too painful for you, to face the truth? >>> >>> >> Honest introspection? I think not. Projection is more like it. > > It's not at all difficult to understand why you'd experience wholesale > panic when challenged to take a good look in the mirror Bottoms. You > know full well you're going to despise what you see as much as everyone > else here despises you and your antics. That's even scarier to you that > losing 6 months of propping up your delusions of significance on Usenet > by infesting alt.comp.freeware with your self-serving lies and > misinformation. > > Your projection is part of the *problem* Bottoms. Willfully continuing > that abnormal behavior won't help you, it will just keep you on the same > path that's gotten you where you are right now... having the truth about > what an utter joke you are in the freeware community shoved in your face > with prejudice. > > If that's the price you're willing to pay to prop up your delusions of > being "somebody" then so be it. It's your mental health on the chopping > block, not mine. The only problem I actually have with your dogged > puerility is that you're displaying it here, and there may be unknowing > folk out there who fall victim to your misinformed, immature opinions. > I, and others, won't let you slather your inanity all over this group > with impunity so you're going to be stuck dealing with it one way or the > other. You can fix it, or suffer it, Bottoms. Up to you. > > *shrug* Ignoring the various lookalikes, Mr Bottoms and his team know exactly how they're behaving ... The main poster in "Team Bottoms" acts as goofy as he can without making it too obvious and in this way he gets plenty of responses to his trolls. Every now and then somebody more techical takes over and makes some Mr Bottoms posts. OTOH when Jacqueline makes a Bottoms post she shows how she struggles with basic operations like unzipping. Teams Bottoms is a circus of trolls.
From: "Lew" Drafted#54 on 26 Feb 2010 08:32 "Franklin" <email.franklinNOTTHISPART(a)yahoo.com.sg> wrote in message news:Xns9D2B879FFB69955401(a)news-3.octanews.net... > > OTOH when Jacqueline makes a Bottoms post she shows how she > struggles with basic operations like unzipping. > > Teams Bottoms is a circus of trolls. Oh the poor wife. Posting for her mentally unstable husband as usual. But please dont mention her and unzipping in the same sentence as it makes me vomit a little in my mouth. Lew
From: Dewey Edwards on 26 Feb 2010 12:02
On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 19:27:37 -0600, �Q� <boxcars(a)gmx.net> wrote: >In <news:4b843eb1$0$283$14726298(a)news.sunsite.dk>, >Gordon <me(a)privacy.net> wrote: > >> On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 15:34:07 +0000, Gordon wrote: >> >> > MagicJack (recently promoted by a poster in this group who whinged >> > that it wouldn't work under Linux) just lost a defamation lawsuit >> > that it filed against Boing Boing. The judge dismissed its case and >> > ordered it to pay more than $50,000 in legal costs. >> >> From the EULA. >> >> "You also understand and agree that use of the magicJack device and >> Software will include advertisements and that these advertisements >> are necessary for the magicJack device to work ... Our computers may >> analyze the phone numbers you call in order to improve the relevance >> of the ads" Kimda scares me here. Will I, as a nonuer, have to worry about my privacy from a call from a Magicjack user? >Ah, the 50K judgment against them couldn't have happened to a nicer >company. I wonder how many other ways they screw their customers, but >I don't wonder enough to bother searching. |