Minkowski Metric.
in [Relativity]
|
Prev: Infinite vs. instant
Next: It's a heatwave
From: Henry Wilson DSc on 30 May 2010 17:56 On Sun, 30 May 2010 13:23:34 -0700, eric gisse <jowr.pi.nospam(a)gmail.com> wrote: >..@..(Henry Wilson DSc) wrote: > >> On Sat, 29 May 2010 06:49:40 -0700 (PDT), PD <thedraperfamily(a)gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>>On May 29, 8:03 am, kenseto <kens...(a)erinet.com> wrote: >>>> On May 28, 11:44 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >> >>>> > First question is, why do you feel the need to disprove relativity? >>>> >>>> Cannot be disproved means not falsifiable....any theory cannot be >>>> falsified, by definition, is not scientific. >>> >>>I didn't say relativity wasn't falsifiable. It is certainly >>>falsifiable, and a number of tests have been performed in that >>>attempt. >>>I asked why the OP felt the NEED to disprove relativity. >> >> ...because the Einsteinian version has brought physics almost to a >> standstill. > >So you are of the opinion that science and technology today is essentially >where it was at in 1904? > >Are you retarded? No, astronomy is.....because of Einstein. Henry Wilson... ........Einstein's Relativity...The religion that worships negative space.
From: Androcles on 30 May 2010 18:04 "Henry Wilson DSc" <..@..> wrote in message news:blm506dr7d6bdgnlblongqane9bk0o1m67(a)4ax.com... | De Sitter used the wrong velocities because he knew nothing about ADoppler. Nor does anyone else. Provide an equation instead of a word and then we can all laugh.
From: eric gisse on 30 May 2010 20:02 ...@..(Henry Wilson DSc) wrote: [....] > > You know I qualified that analysis with a statement that BaTh has no > current explanation of Fizeau on account of the fact that there is no > satisfactory theory for refractive index. If the absorption/readmission > theory is correct, then. BaTh would need to know the phase lag involved in > this process before it could formulate its own theory. That's your explanation? "Well nobody - especially me - knows the theory behind the refractive index". > > On the other hand, as Renshaw showed, Fizeau clearly refutes Einstein's > silly theory. Really, Renshaw? You are citing RENSHAW? lawl > > Henry Wilson... > > .......Einstein's Relativity...The religion that worships negative space.
From: eric gisse on 30 May 2010 20:07 ...@..(Henry Wilson DSc) wrote: > On Sun, 30 May 2010 13:23:34 -0700, eric gisse <jowr.pi.nospam(a)gmail.com> > wrote: > >>..@..(Henry Wilson DSc) wrote: >> >>> On Sat, 29 May 2010 06:49:40 -0700 (PDT), PD <thedraperfamily(a)gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>>On May 29, 8:03 am, kenseto <kens...(a)erinet.com> wrote: >>>>> On May 28, 11:44 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>> >>>>> > First question is, why do you feel the need to disprove relativity? >>>>> >>>>> Cannot be disproved means not falsifiable....any theory cannot be >>>>> falsified, by definition, is not scientific. >>>> >>>>I didn't say relativity wasn't falsifiable. It is certainly >>>>falsifiable, and a number of tests have been performed in that >>>>attempt. >>>>I asked why the OP felt the NEED to disprove relativity. >>> >>> ...because the Einsteinian version has brought physics almost to a >>> standstill. >> >>So you are of the opinion that science and technology today is essentially >>where it was at in 1904? >> >>Are you retarded? > > No, astronomy is.....because of Einstein. Ah, just astronomy? Not thermodynamics, which Einstein directly contributed to (theory of Brownian motion, calculation of specific heats for quantum solids) and indirectly contributed to (every time thermodynamics uses quantum theory) ? Not quantum mechanics, which he helped create? Whose very nature was formed by Einstein's arguments, to this very day? Not the laser, the theoretical groundwork of which was laid down directly by Einstein? Not particle physics, which exists only because of Einstein? Not the proton/anti-proton beam cancer therapies which exist only because of special relativity? You don't seem to have thought this through too much. > > > > Henry Wilson... > > .......Einstein's Relativity...The religion that worships negative space.
From: eric gisse on 30 May 2010 20:07
...@..(Henry Wilson DSc) wrote: [...] > ....and, "if the clocks don't give the required answer, just change their > readings"....Einstein 1905 You use quote marks, even though Einstein never actually said that. > >>Ken Seto > > > Henry Wilson... > > .......Einstein's Relativity...The religion that worships negative space. |