Minkowski Metric.
in [Relativity]
|
Prev: Infinite vs. instant
Next: It's a heatwave
From: Androcles on 4 Jun 2010 19:24 "Henry Wilson DSc" <..@..> wrote in message news:jbui06tl3ng7cqn2tt4kfa3vqe8tjbel6e(a)4ax.com... | On Fri, 4 Jun 2010 08:30:17 +0100, "Androcles" <Headmaster(a)Hogwarts.physics_z> | wrote: | | > | >"Henry Wilson DSc" <..@..> wrote in message | >news:rogg0613iedf8ppqc4dvrb2247c6tmvaup(a)4ax.com... | >| On Fri, 4 Jun 2010 00:46:53 +0100, "Androcles" | ><Headmaster(a)Hogwarts.physics_z> | >| wrote: | | >| Aha! OK. Maybe phosphorencence could be related. | >| And the phase lag at interactions should apply to ANY theory not just | >BaTh. | >| | >| So Andersen and others are talking bullshit anyway. | > | >Did you ever know a time when Andersen wasn't bullshitting? | >He's an assistant schoolmarm and a relativist, he only knows bullshit. | >Those that can, do. Those that can't, teach. | >Phosphors emit photons (usually of lower energy) when they are hit by | >photons. If you put a rare gas inside a glass tube and run a current | >through it, the gas emits UV photons. That hits the powder on the | >inside wall of the tube and the photon is absorbed. Then it is re-emitted | >as visible light and bingo, you have a fluorescent (=phosphorescent) tube. | >Break one and you'll see the powder fall out. They come in a range | >of colours by mixing different powders and have advertising names | >like "warm white", "black light", "pearl", "cool white", "plant growth" | >that help to sell the product. | > | > | >| | >| >| >No wonder you don't know any physics, you've always wanted to be an | >| >engineer | >| >| >that worked on Concorde but never qualified. | >| | >| I made planes fly very successfully using balsa wood and rubber bands. | >| | >I had an E.D. Bee. | > http://modelenginenews.org/cardfile/edb.html | | Yeah! I had one of those too....nearly chopped my bloody finger off...... | Nylon propellor, bloody sharp edge. | >Rubber band would be about right for an ozzie. | > | > | | | Henry Wilson... | | .......Einstein's Relativity...The religion that worships negative space.
From: Sam Wormley on 4 Jun 2010 21:10 On 6/4/10 4:58 PM, Henry Wilson DSc wrote: > Einstein's metric is nothing but a negative area..... one square subtracted > from a smaller square....since c^2 is always larger than v^2 according to his > silly theory > > The whole of his religion is based on imaginary properties of negative area and > volume. > > You can't help laughing.... > > Henry Wilson... > > .......Einstein's Relativity...The religion that worships negative space. Boy Henri, you don't know anything about relativity, do you? Hope you and Seto don't create a startup, rip off a few stooopid investors then declare bankruptcy... Happens all the time. Relativity theory is self consistent and has no contradictions. If fact, there has yet to be an observation that contradicts a prediction of relativity. Are There Any Good Books on Relativity Theory? http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Administrivia/rel_booklist.html
From: eric gisse on 4 Jun 2010 21:58 Sam Wormley wrote: > On 6/4/10 4:58 PM, Henry Wilson DSc wrote: >> Einstein's metric is nothing but a negative area..... one square >> subtracted from a smaller square....since c^2 is always larger than v^2 >> according to his silly theory >> >> The whole of his religion is based on imaginary properties of negative >> area and volume. >> >> You can't help laughing.... >> >> Henry Wilson... >> >> .......Einstein's Relativity...The religion that worships negative space. > > Boy Henri, you don't know anything about relativity, do you? Hope you > and Seto don't create a startup, rip off a few stooopid investors > then declare bankruptcy... Happens all the time. > > Relativity theory is self consistent and has no contradictions. If > fact, there has yet to be an observation that contradicts a prediction > of relativity. > > Are There Any Good Books on Relativity Theory? > http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Administrivia/rel_booklist.html The basic problem is that Henri doesn't understand 19th century physics or mathematics.
From: Paul B. Andersen on 7 Jun 2010 15:20 Forgotten the challenge, Ralph? If we write the speed of light in moving water as c/n + xv then the fringe shift in M&M's repetition of Fizeau will be: delta = (4Lvn2/lambda.c)x Do you refute it, or do you accept that this equation is correct? Will you keep fleeing, Ralph? -- Paul http://home.c2i.net/pb_andersen/
From: Paul B. Andersen on 7 Jun 2010 15:22
Forgotten the challenge, Ralph? If we write the speed of light in moving water as c/n + xv then the fringe displacement in M&M's repetition of Fizeau will be: delta = (4Lvn^2/lambda.c)x Do you refute it, or do you accept that this equation is correct? Will you keep fleeing, Ralph? -- Paul http://home.c2i.net/pb_andersen/ |