Minkowski Metric.
in [Relativity]
|
Prev: Infinite vs. instant
Next: It's a heatwave
From: Henry Wilson DSc on 3 Jun 2010 21:25 On Thu, 03 Jun 2010 17:38:52 -0700, eric gisse <jowr.pi.nospam(a)gmail.com> wrote: >..@..(Henry Wilson DSc) wrote: > >[...] > >> Like I said, it is futile to try to analyse this whole problem unless more >> is known about the time lag involved when a photon interacts with an atom. > >The field of study is known as 'optics', it is well established as the >theory behind 'optics' is pretty well developed. > >Is there a particular reason you dismiss the entire field of optics? You >claim you used to work at an observatory. Apparently you weren't allowed to >use the telescopes or spectrometers. > >> >> That seems to be the principal process involved in refractive index. > >You are guessing! > >> >>>If so, please show what the error is, and write the equation >>>you now think is correct. >>> >>>Remember that Renshaw's equation is experimentally proven to be wrong. >>> >>>> >>>> (4.L.v.n^2.x/lambda.c) multiplied by 'w',...another 'phase lag' factor >>>> named after me. >>> >>>Another joke? >> >> ...well I cannot call it 'W' because that is already in use. >> >> Maybe 'WIT' would be more appropriate...Wilson's Interaction Time. > >How many things have you named after yourself now? > >Do you find it at all curious how nobody seems to be interested in all those >mysterious things you've named after yourself? Perhaps because you invent >them every time you come up against something you can't explain, then forget >it shortly after. > when are you going to say something intelligent? Henry Wilson... ........Einstein's Relativity...The religion that worships negative space.
From: eric gisse on 4 Jun 2010 01:31 ...@..(Henry Wilson DSc) wrote: > On Thu, 03 Jun 2010 17:38:52 -0700, eric gisse <jowr.pi.nospam(a)gmail.com> > wrote: > >>..@..(Henry Wilson DSc) wrote: >> >>[...] >> >>> Like I said, it is futile to try to analyse this whole problem unless >>> more is known about the time lag involved when a photon interacts with >>> an atom. >> >>The field of study is known as 'optics', it is well established as the >>theory behind 'optics' is pretty well developed. >> >>Is there a particular reason you dismiss the entire field of optics? You >>claim you used to work at an observatory. Apparently you weren't allowed >>to use the telescopes or spectrometers. >> >>> >>> That seems to be the principal process involved in refractive index. >> >>You are guessing! >> >>> >>>>If so, please show what the error is, and write the equation >>>>you now think is correct. >>>> >>>>Remember that Renshaw's equation is experimentally proven to be wrong. >>>> >>>>> >>>>> (4.L.v.n^2.x/lambda.c) multiplied by 'w',...another 'phase lag' factor >>>>> named after me. >>>> >>>>Another joke? >>> >>> ...well I cannot call it 'W' because that is already in use. >>> >>> Maybe 'WIT' would be more appropriate...Wilson's Interaction Time. >> >>How many things have you named after yourself now? >> >>Do you find it at all curious how nobody seems to be interested in all >>those mysterious things you've named after yourself? Perhaps because you >>invent them every time you come up against something you can't explain, >>then forget it shortly after. >> > > when are you going to say something intelligent? Coward. > > Henry Wilson... > > .......Einstein's Relativity...The religion that worships negative space.
From: Androcles on 4 Jun 2010 03:30 "Henry Wilson DSc" <..@..> wrote in message news:rogg0613iedf8ppqc4dvrb2247c6tmvaup(a)4ax.com... | On Fri, 4 Jun 2010 00:46:53 +0100, "Androcles" <Headmaster(a)Hogwarts.physics_z> | wrote: | | > | >"Henry Wilson DSc" <..@..> wrote in message | >news:l2eg06pd6almgsoqm3se60jf47g78s79nc(a)4ax.com... | >| On Thu, 3 Jun 2010 22:32:15 +0100, "Androcles" | ><Headmaster(a)Hogwarts.physics_z> | >| wrote: | | >| > | >| > If you hit a blue diamond with UV light it'll glow red in the dark. | >| > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hope_Diamond | >| >The Hope Diamond is a large, 45.52 carats (9.10 g), deep-blue diamond, | >| >housed in the Smithsonian Natural History Museum in Washington, D.C. The | >| >Hope Diamond is blue to the naked eye because of trace amounts of boron | >| >within its crystal structure, but it exhibits red phosphorescence under | >| >ultraviolet light. | >| | >| That's very interesting..... but why are you telling me this? | > | >The red phosphorescence DECAYS AFTER UV photon is absorbed | >and re-emitted as a red photon by an atom. Turn off the UV and the glow | >is still present for some time after. In other words there is no single | >"lag" time that you can measure, all you can do is a statistic on the | >half-life, we have no idea when a boron atom will lose its energy. | >The same is true for the cooling exhaust manifold of an engine, radiant | >heat is still photon emission but at a lower frequency. | >That's what you needed to know to formulate a BaTh theory. | | Aha! OK. Maybe phosphorencence could be related. | And the phase lag at interactions should apply to ANY theory not just BaTh. | | So Andersen and others are talking bullshit anyway. Did you ever know a time when Andersen wasn't bullshitting? He's an assistant schoolmarm and a relativist, he only knows bullshit. Those that can, do. Those that can't, teach. Phosphors emit photons (usually of lower energy) when they are hit by photons. If you put a rare gas inside a glass tube and run a current through it, the gas emits UV photons. That hits the powder on the inside wall of the tube and the photon is absorbed. Then it is re-emitted as visible light and bingo, you have a fluorescent (=phosphorescent) tube. Break one and you'll see the powder fall out. They come in a range of colours by mixing different powders and have advertising names like "warm white", "black light", "pearl", "cool white", "plant growth" that help to sell the product. | | >| >No wonder you don't know any physics, you've always wanted to be an | >engineer | >| >that worked on Concorde but never qualified. | | I made planes fly very successfully using balsa wood and rubber bands. | I had an E.D. Bee. http://modelenginenews.org/cardfile/edb.html Rubber band would be about right for an ozzie.
From: Henry Wilson DSc on 4 Jun 2010 18:09 On Fri, 4 Jun 2010 08:30:17 +0100, "Androcles" <Headmaster(a)Hogwarts.physics_z> wrote: > >"Henry Wilson DSc" <..@..> wrote in message >news:rogg0613iedf8ppqc4dvrb2247c6tmvaup(a)4ax.com... >| On Fri, 4 Jun 2010 00:46:53 +0100, "Androcles" ><Headmaster(a)Hogwarts.physics_z> >| wrote: >| Aha! OK. Maybe phosphorencence could be related. >| And the phase lag at interactions should apply to ANY theory not just >BaTh. >| >| So Andersen and others are talking bullshit anyway. > >Did you ever know a time when Andersen wasn't bullshitting? >He's an assistant schoolmarm and a relativist, he only knows bullshit. >Those that can, do. Those that can't, teach. >Phosphors emit photons (usually of lower energy) when they are hit by >photons. If you put a rare gas inside a glass tube and run a current >through it, the gas emits UV photons. That hits the powder on the >inside wall of the tube and the photon is absorbed. Then it is re-emitted >as visible light and bingo, you have a fluorescent (=phosphorescent) tube. >Break one and you'll see the powder fall out. They come in a range >of colours by mixing different powders and have advertising names >like "warm white", "black light", "pearl", "cool white", "plant growth" >that help to sell the product. > > >| >| >| >No wonder you don't know any physics, you've always wanted to be an >| >engineer >| >| >that worked on Concorde but never qualified. >| >| I made planes fly very successfully using balsa wood and rubber bands. >| >I had an E.D. Bee. > http://modelenginenews.org/cardfile/edb.html Yeah! I had one of those too....nearly chopped my bloody finger off...... >Rubber band would be about right for an ozzie. > > Henry Wilson... ........Einstein's Relativity...The religion that worships negative space.
From: eric gisse on 4 Jun 2010 19:13
...@..(Henry Wilson DSc) wrote: [...] > Einstein's metric is nothing but a negative area..... one square > subtracted from a smaller square....since c^2 is always larger than v^2 > according to his silly theory Goddamn you are stupid. [...] |