Minkowski Metric.
in [Physics]
|
From: Paul B. Andersen on 11 Jun 2010 06:23 On 11.06.2010 01:10, Sam Wormley wrote: > On 6/10/10 5:14 PM, Henry Wilson DSc wrote: >> Time = velocity x distance >> (: >> Interesting...... > > Given that velocity, v = dx/dt > > amd speed = |v| = d/t > > t = distance/speed > > Henri is making no sense again! > My blunder. I wrote: | For a non dispersive dielectric we get | the delay over a distance d: | | delay = d/dw((w.n/c)d) = d.n/c | | delay = phase velocity multiplied by distance | It was so elementary that I didn't think twice and didn't notice the idiotic screw up. -- Paul http://home.c2i.net/pb_andersen/
From: Henry Wilson DSc on 11 Jun 2010 17:09 On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 12:23:20 +0200, "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen(a)somewhere.no> wrote: >On 11.06.2010 01:10, Sam Wormley wrote: >> On 6/10/10 5:14 PM, Henry Wilson DSc wrote: >>> Time = velocity x distance >>> (: >>> Interesting...... >> >> Given that velocity, v = dx/dt >> >> amd speed = |v| = d/t >> >> t = distance/speed >> >> Henri is making no sense again! >> > >My blunder. > >I wrote: >| For a non dispersive dielectric we get >| the delay over a distance d: >| >| delay = d/dw((w.n/c)d) = d.n/c >| >| delay = phase velocity multiplied by distance >| > >It was so elementary that I didn't think twice >and didn't notice the idiotic screw up. You never do How about correcting your sagnac screw up. Henry Wilson... ........Einstein's Relativity...The religion that worships negative space.
From: Henry Wilson DSc on 11 Jun 2010 17:11 On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 22:38:29 -0500, Sam Wormley <swormley1(a)gmail.com> wrote: >On 6/10/10 6:31 PM, Henry Wilson DSc wrote: >> On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 18:10:11 -0500, Sam Wormley<swormley1(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On 6/10/10 5:14 PM, Henry Wilson DSc wrote: >>>> Time = velocity x distance >>>> (: >>>> Interesting...... >>> >>> Given that velocity, v = dx/dt >>> >>> amd speed = |v| = d/t >>> >>> t = distance/speed >>> >>> Henri is making no sense again! >> >> I was repeating what Paul claimed, you idiot. >> >> So you agree, Andersen is making no sense again? >> >> >> Henry Wilson... >> >> .......Einstein's Relativity...The religion that worships negative space. > > All I can say, Henri, is that your posting record indicates > you don't much know physics. So the fact that PA made a blunder proves I know little about physics? Is that the way your mind works, wormey? No wonder you're silly enough worship Einstein. Henry Wilson... ........Einstein's Relativity...The religion that worships negative space.
From: spudnik on 11 Jun 2010 17:42 so, how is gold, the color of relativity? > It requires that the beams travel at c+/-v wrt the source. thus&so: I read [*] the name of the unindicted co-conspirator of HDubya in Iran-contra, Oliver "Buck" Revell, who laid down the law at the NSF meeting, that "global" cooling would henceforth not be funded. see, I put that word in scare-quotes, becuase it was the self- same flat-map miscomprehension of insolation -- merely the differential from pole to equator -- that presupposes that glaciation requires a lesser temperature, or that deglaciation'd require a greater one. * http://tarpley.net/online-books/george-bush-the-unauthorized-biography/ --Stop BP's and Waxman's arbitrageur's delight, the cap&trade that the WSUrinal *calls*, Captain Tax (but, there seems to be no provision for goment revenues )-!... Fermat's Next Theorem: http://wlym.com
From: Paul B. Andersen on 12 Jun 2010 10:51
On 11.06.2010 23:09, Henry Wilson DSc wrote: > How about correcting your sagnac screw up. Can't you do it for me? http://home.c2i.net/pb_andersen/pdf/sagnac_ring.pdf http://home.c2i.net/pb_andersen/pdf/four_mirror_sagnac.pdf http://home.c2i.net/pb_andersen/FourMirrorSagnac.html Please correct them. -- Paul http://home.c2i.net/pb_andersen/ |