More Einsteinian Idiocy
in [Relativity]
|
From: Henry Wilson DSc on 26 May 2010 22:01 On Thu, 27 May 2010 01:11:14 +0100, "Androcles" <Headmaster(a)Hogwarts.physics_z> wrote: > >"Henry Wilson DSc" <..@..> wrote in message >news:sicrv5hs7qh7s69a1emlet9p88bhhs37ga(a)4ax.com... >| Einstein's P1 states that, "the laws of physics are the same on all >frames". > >No it doesn't, Einstein's P1 states > >"Take, for example, the reciprocal electrodynamic action of a magnet and a >conductor. The observable phenomenon here depends only on the relative >motion of the conductor and the magnet," >"Examples of this sort, together with [yada suggestion yada suggestion yada] >will hereafter be called the "Principle of Relativity" > >Learn to read, Awilson, you've been listening to too many kooks. "The laws are the same in all frames..." Ah! Actually I tell a lie. They aren't the same ....the LTs have to be applied to make them the same." "But since the LTs are derived on the assumption that the laws are the same then it is proven that their application is correct and the laws ARE the same..." Einstein...1905 Henry Wilson... ........A relativist's IQ = his snipping ability.
From: SolomonW on 27 May 2010 05:23 On Wed, 26 May 2010 23:48:58 GMT, Henry Wilson DSc wrote: > Einstein's P1 states that, "the laws of physics are the same on all frames". It would also be true in Newtonian physics.
From: rotchm on 27 May 2010 09:05 A "Law of Physics" is by *definition* those principles or equation(s) that remain the same in all (admissible) frames. Therefore, your "Einstein's statement" is true; its a tautology. You can choose many different (operational) definitions (OD) that will yield many different "Laws of physics". Choose the OD that simplifies "your life". - Poincare ~1890
From: kenseto on 27 May 2010 10:11 On May 26, 7:48 pm, ..@..(Henry Wilson DSc) wrote: > Einstein's P1 states that, "the laws of physics are the same on all frames". > > Then his stupid theory goes on to point out that they are only the same if and > when the LTs are applied. > > So what is it really? ARE they the same or aren't they? The laws of physics are the same in all inertial frames because every SR observer uses a rubber ruler (1 meter=1/299,792,458 light-second) to measure length and a rubber clock second to mesure time. Definition for a rubber clock second: The passage of a clock second in A's frame does not correspond to the passage of a clock second in B's frame. In other words, A's clock second has different duration (different time content)than B's clock second. Ken Seto
From: Dono. on 27 May 2010 11:17
On May 26, 4:48 pm, ..@..(Henry Wilson DSc) wrote: > Einstein's P1 states that, "the laws of physics are the same on all frames". > So does Galilei, dumbshit. |