From: Androcles on

"DanB" <abc(a)some.net> wrote in message news:YH34n.33$nh7.5(a)newsfe20.iad...
> Iarnrod wrote:
>> On Jan 15, 11:57 am, DanB<a...(a)some.net> wrote:
>>> Iarnrod wrote:
>>>
>>>> There is, of course. Live phone calls from passengers reporting the
>>>> hijackings. BODIES of the hijackers RECOVERED in the wreckage.
>>>
>>> This wreckage?
>>> <http://grandrants.files.wordpress.com/2008/09/911_shanksville.jpg>
>>> <http://www.wtc-terrorattack.com/shankesville/shanksville16.JPG>
>>> <http://www.nomoretyranny.org/gallery/gallery3-4.jpg>
>>
>> Why, yes. Why do you ask? Oh wait, you�re a dope...
>
> Bzzzt. ad hominem, you loose.

Bzzt.. purhips yu meen "luze"...




From: DanB on
Androcles wrote:
> "DanB"<abc(a)some.net> wrote in message news:YH34n.33$nh7.5(a)newsfe20.iad...
>> Iarnrod wrote:
>>> On Jan 15, 11:57 am, DanB<a...(a)some.net> wrote:
>>>> Iarnrod wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> There is, of course. Live phone calls from passengers reporting the
>>>>> hijackings. BODIES of the hijackers RECOVERED in the wreckage.
>>>>
>>>> This wreckage?
>>>> <http://grandrants.files.wordpress.com/2008/09/911_shanksville.jpg>
>>>> <http://www.wtc-terrorattack.com/shankesville/shanksville16.JPG>
>>>> <http://www.nomoretyranny.org/gallery/gallery3-4.jpg>
>>>
>>> Why, yes. Why do you ask? Oh wait, you�re a dope...
>>
>> Bzzzt. ad hominem, you loose.
>
> Bzzt.. purhips yu meen "luze"...

Bzzzt, you just recently plonked me, that makes you a liar.
From: Androcles on

"DanB" <abc(a)some.net> wrote in message
news:Et44n.5956$5m.415(a)newsfe12.iad...
> Androcles wrote:
>> "DanB"<abc(a)some.net> wrote in message
>> news:YH34n.33$nh7.5(a)newsfe20.iad...
>>> Iarnrod wrote:
>>>> On Jan 15, 11:57 am, DanB<a...(a)some.net> wrote:
>>>>> Iarnrod wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> There is, of course. Live phone calls from passengers reporting the
>>>>>> hijackings. BODIES of the hijackers RECOVERED in the wreckage.
>>>>>
>>>>> This wreckage?
>>>>> <http://grandrants.files.wordpress.com/2008/09/911_shanksville.jpg>
>>>>> <http://www.wtc-terrorattack.com/shankesville/shanksville16.JPG>
>>>>> <http://www.nomoretyranny.org/gallery/gallery3-4.jpg>
>>>>
>>>> Why, yes. Why do you ask? Oh wait, you�re a dope...
>>>
>>> Bzzzt. ad hominem, you loose.
>>
>> Bzzt.. purhips yu meen "luze"...
>
> Bzzzt, you just recently plonked me, that makes you a liar.

Plonks were lifted for Xmas, but no problem, I can do it again.

Some weirdoes are not kill-filed, they amuse me and I retain them for
their entertainment value as I would any chicken with two heads, either
one of which enables the dumb bird to scratch dirt, step back, look
down, step forward to the same spot and repeat the process eternally.




From: DanB on
Androcles wrote:
>
> Plonks were lifted for Xmas...

Still a lie.

> but no problem, I can do it again.

By a crank like you?! Go for it.....
From: Iarnrod on
On Jan 15, 2:53 pm, knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com wrote:
> On Jan 15, 10:57 am, DanB <a...(a)some.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Iarnrod wrote:
>
> > > There is, of course. Live phone calls from passengers reporting the
> > > hijackings. BODIES of the hijackers RECOVERED in the wreckage.
>
> > This wreckage?
> > <http://grandrants.files.wordpress.com/2008/09/911_shanksville.jpg>
> > <http://www.wtc-terrorattack.com/shankesville/shanksville16.JPG>
> > <http://www.nomoretyranny.org/gallery/gallery3-4.jpg>
>
> > > There is not one single piece of evidence pointing to an inside job.
>
> > Sounds like lawyer speak. This is how science is done.
>
> >   'You look to falsify a hypothesis.'
>
> > Now, in real science you do experiments as many times as needed. We
> > can't do that so it is a matter of looking at what evidence is available.
>
> > Official theory, a Boeing 757-200 created the crash site in the above
> > photos.
>
> > Official theory, a Boeing 757-223 was nearly at level flight by the time
> > it passed over the clover leaf doing 800 ft/sec. Now crunch the numbers
> > of the required maneuver to pull this off.
>
> > Official theory, a Boeing 757-223 melted into the pentagon. Look over
> > the photo evidence.
> > <http://lakeweb.com/F77/images>
>
> > Official theory, All the outer columns of WTC7, having a safety factor
> > of ~6, simultaneously failed from a fire inside the building.
>
> > <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LD06SAf0p9A>
>
> > Official theory, WTC1 and WTC2 failed catastrophically from rather cold
> > fires.
>
> > Where in any official report is the pulverization and removal of the
> > concrete that was in the core addressed so that the skeleton of the core
> > is left standing?
>
> > <http://algoxy.com/psych/spire-sequence.html>
>
> > If there is any question about the ejection of material from the
> > structure, take a good look.
>
> > <http://algoxy.com/psych/images/coreblast1.jpg>
>
> > > FACT.
>
> > Your fact does not make a 'truth'. You can only claim it does so it is
> > only your opinion.
>
> > All we know is that the official hypothesis may be true. But if it is,
> > why are there so many bazaar anomalies in evidence?
>
> The Rabbit hole goes deep.

So does the hole in your head, sheeple.