From: pyotr filipivich on
I missed the Staff Meeting but the Minutes record that "Peter Webb"
<webbfamily(a)DIESPAMDIEoptusnet.com.au> reported Elvis on Sat, 16 Jan
2010 16:24:04 +1100 in misc.survivalism:
>Sorry, what you have posted is pretty much the Government's version of what
>happened.
>
>What I want is "Chewies" version of what happened.

Ah, well in that case.it involves Alien Space Bats, Orbital Mind
Control Lasers, and their secret control by the Convenience Store
Clerks.
>
>Then, I can compare his version to the official version, and see which is
>more plausible. He has already told us that he believes there were hijackers
>on board, but that 5 escaped, so I want to see how that is possible. My
>other questions are in a similar vein.
>
>When Chewy provides his version of the "truth", we can both have look at it
>and see how plausible it is. At the moment, I don't know Chewy's explanation
>for the holes he seems to think exist in the official story, and so I don't
>know if he really has a better explanation.
>
>Hopefully we will know soon.
>
-
pyotr filipivich.
Just about the time you finally see light at the end of the tunnel,
you find out it's a Government Project to build more tunnel.
From: pyotr filipivich on
I missed the Staff Meeting but the Minutes record that "Peter Webb"
<webbfamily(a)DIESPAMDIEoptusnet.com.au> reported Elvis on Sat, 16 Jan
2010 18:45:37 +1100 in misc.survivalism:
>
>"Curly Surmudgeon" <CurlySurmudgeon(a)live.com> wrote in message
>news:hirq5i$u4p$5(a)news.eternal-september.org...
>> On Sat, 16 Jan 2010 17:20:34 +1100, "Peter Webb"
>> <webbfamily(a)DIESPAMDIEoptusnet.com.au> wrote:
>>
>>> "Curly Surmudgeon" <CurlySurmudgeon(a)live.com> wrote in message
>>> news:hirk7k$7a0$31(a)news.eternal-september.org...
>>>> On Sat, 16 Jan 2010 16:24:04 +1100, "Peter Webb"
>>>> <webbfamily(a)DIESPAMDIEoptusnet.com.au> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Sorry, what you have posted is pretty much the Government's version of
>>>>> what happened.
>>>>>
>>>>> What I want is "Chewies" version of what happened.
>>>>>
>>>>> Then, I can compare his version to the official version, and see which
>>>>> is more plausible. He has already told us that he believes there were
>>>>> hijackers on board, but that 5 escaped, so I want to see how that is
>>>>> possible. My other questions are in a similar vein.
>>>>>
>>>>> When Chewy provides his version of the "truth", we can both have look
>>>>> at it and see how plausible it is. At the moment, I don't know Chewy's
>>>>> explanation for the holes he seems to think exist in the official
>>>>> story, and so I don't know if he really has a better explanation.
>>>>>
>>>>> Hopefully we will know soon.
>>>>
>>>> Are you speaking to yourself?
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Curly
>>>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> Whose God Do You Kill For?
>>>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>
>>> Lets hear your opinion of what actually happened that day.
>>>
>>> I want to know the "truth", please tell me.
>>
>> Why are you ignoring the question and snipping the attributes?
>>
>
>Huh?
>
>All I am doing is trying to find out the "truth" of what happened on 9/11.
>
>Please tell me.

Sorry about the delay, Looks like I'll have to go down and order
the Special Double Size Lime Green Slurpy, and see if they'll reset
the mind control lasers. Can't promise anything, but I'll buck it up
the chain.


-
pyotr filipivich.
"I wish you wouldn't use the mind control device - I get
these terrible migranes until it's finished." Jonathon
From: Iarnrod on
On Jan 21, 8:46 pm, knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com wrote:
> <nothing of any relevance, as usual>
>
> A comment about it

Knowsknothing, there is ZERO relevance to your paranoid delusions.
Facts is facts, and the FACT is that your physically impossible claims
have been proven FALSE. No amount of whining and complaining about
your paranoiac delusions of gubmint infiltrators will make your ninja
thermite burn sideways or your cartoon magic explosives go off
undetected either by sight or sound.

In short, you lose.
From: knews4u2chew on
On Jan 21, 8:03 pm, Iarnrod <iarn...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Jan 21, 8:46 pm, knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com wrote:
>
> > <nothing of any relevance, as usual>
>
> > A comment about it
>
Geez.
You can't post a thing without snipping.
http://rense.com/general89/rule.htm

> Knowsknothing, there is ZERO relevance to your paranoid delusions.

Really?

> Facts is facts, and the FACT is that your physically impossible claims
> have been proven FALSE.

Sure.
http://www.bentham-open.org/pages/content.php?TOCPJ/2009/00000002/00000001/7TOCPJ.SGM

>No amount of whining and complaining about
> your paranoiac delusions of gubmint infiltrators will make your ninja
> thermite burn sideways or your cartoon magic explosives go off
> undetected either by sight or sound.
>
Sure.
http://www.google.com/search?q=shaped+charges&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a

> In short, you lose.

Drop dead.
From: AllYou! on
In
news:b758933b-2a23-4fbb-8cd1-ea637fd20fd8(a)b10g2000yqa.googlegroups.com,
knews4u2chew(a)yahoo.com <knews4u2chew(a)yahoo.com> mused:
> On Jan 21, 8:03 pm, Iarnrod <iarn...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>> On Jan 21, 8:46 pm, knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com wrote:
>>
>>> <nothing of any relevance, as usual>
>>
>>> A comment about it
>>
> Geez.
> You can't post a thing without snipping.
> http://rense.com/general89/rule.htm
>
>> Knowsknothing, there is ZERO relevance to your paranoid
>> delusions.
>
> Really?

Really.

http://www.911myths.com/
http://www.debunking911.com/links.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/September_11,_2001_attacks
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debunking_9/11_Myths
http://www.answers.com/topic/debunking-9-11-myths
http://www.debunk911myths.org/
http://www.slate.com/id/2088092/
http://www.amazon.com/Debunking-11-Myths-Conspiracy-Theories/dp/15881...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9/11_conspiracy_theories
http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=fahrenheit-2777
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/gate/archive/2006/04/...
http://www.2spare.com/item_43133.aspx
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conspiracy_theory

>> Facts is facts, and the FACT is that your physically impossible
>> claims have been proven FALSE.
>
> Sure.
> http://www.bentham-open.org/pages/content.php?TOCPJ/2009/00000002/00000001/7TOCPJ.SGM

http://www.911myths.com/
http://www.debunking911.com/links.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/September_11,_2001_attacks
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debunking_9/11_Myths
http://www.answers.com/topic/debunking-9-11-myths
http://www.debunk911myths.org/
http://www.slate.com/id/2088092/
http://www.amazon.com/Debunking-11-Myths-Conspiracy-Theories/dp/15881...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9/11_conspiracy_theories
http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=fahrenheit-2777
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/gate/archive/2006/04/...
http://www.2spare.com/item_43133.aspx
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conspiracy_theory

>
>> No amount of whining and complaining about
>> your paranoiac delusions of gubmint infiltrators will make your
>> ninja thermite burn sideways or your cartoon magic explosives
>> go off undetected either by sight or sound.
>>
> Sure.
> http://www.google.com/search?q=shaped+charges&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a

http://www.911myths.com/
http://www.debunking911.com/links.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/September_11,_2001_attacks
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debunking_9/11_Myths
http://www.answers.com/topic/debunking-9-11-myths
http://www.debunk911myths.org/
http://www.slate.com/id/2088092/
http://www.amazon.com/Debunking-11-Myths-Conspiracy-Theories/dp/15881...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9/11_conspiracy_theories
http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=fahrenheit-2777
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/gate/archive/2006/04/...
http://www.2spare.com/item_43133.aspx
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conspiracy_theory

>
>> In short, you lose.
>
> Drop dead.

Isn't that Black Op speak?