More Holes in 9-11 Kooker Knowsknothing's Head
in [Physics]
|
Prev: Foundations of operations management, second canadian edition 2e ritzman malhotra krajwsky solutions manual
Next: Quantum Gravity 354.3: Is Light Repulsion?
From: Peter Webb on 15 Jan 2010 19:34 You have already said you believe that what flew into the WTC buildings were airplanes with hijackers on board. Even the most cursory glance at the evidence suggests some huge problems with this theory. How do you explain: * The fact (according to you, anyway) that 5 of the hijackers lived? * The absence of holes in the sides of the buildings where the > 1 ton engines must have impacted? * The fact that the engines were retrieved from outside the buildings? * The fact that there is no record of the cabin door being opened in the preceding 30 hours in the flight recorder, a physical impossibility? And what about the thing that hit the Pentagon? Was that also a plane with hijackers on board? How do you explain that multiple eyewitnesses identified it as a much smaller plane or cruise missile? Well? What's your theory?
From: DanB on 15 Jan 2010 19:52 Iarnrod wrote: > > So does the hole in your head, sheeple. Sign of desperation....
From: pyotr filipivich on 15 Jan 2010 20:09 I missed the Staff Meeting but the Minutes record that DanB <abc(a)some.net> reported Elvis on Fri, 15 Jan 2010 12:52:25 -0700 in misc.survivalism: >>> Official theory, WTC1 and WTC2 failed catastrophically from rather cold >>> fires. >> Fires are not cold, Danny. >Those were, did you see the black smoke? Does he know that some fires burn hotter than others? Or that by comparison some fires are cooler? I think he needs to stick with liberal studies, too much science confuses him. - pyotr filipivich "If 9/11 was really an inside job, you wouldn't be driving around with a bumper sticker bragging that you were on to it." Mark Steyn, Oct 27, 2007
From: Androcles on 15 Jan 2010 20:29 "DanB" <abc(a)some.net> wrote in message news:P484n.6270$ap2.2867(a)newsfe18.iad... > Iarnrod wrote: >> >> So does the hole in your head, sheeple. > > Sign of desperation.... You loose, luzer. Get loost.
From: Peter Webb on 15 Jan 2010 21:01
I am not sure what you believe. Perhaps you can tell us. What do you believe hit the WTC on 9/11 (if anything)? What do you believe crashed into the Pentagon on 9/11 (if anything) ? What do you believe crashed into the ground in Pennslyvania on 9/11 (if anything), claimed by the US Government to be a commercial jetliner? |