More PDF Freeware - 100+
in [Freeware]
|
From: Man-wai Chang to The Door (24000bps) on 23 Jan 2010 07:39 On 22-Jan-10 11:01, wasbit wrote: > PDF Utilities: Copied! -- @~@ Might, Courage, Vision, SINCERITY. / v \ Simplicity is Beauty! May the Force and Farce be with you! /( _ )\ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.32.5 ^ ^ 20:39:01 up 1:27 0 users load average: 1.19 1.31 1.14 不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA): http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
From: Susan Bugher on 23 Jan 2010 12:14 M.L. wrote: > I am satisfied enough to have freeware apps merely brought to my > attention. If I want more info I can just click on the handy link > provided. There is room here for both FYI and descriptive posts. I like Wasbit's lists too. I'm *hoping* he'll encourage discussion of the apps when he posts a list. I don't see lists and discussion as an either/or kind of thing. IMO lists of apps and discussion of the apps on the list go together like ham and eggs, bread and butter. . . Susan -- Posted to alt.comp.freeware Search alt.comp.freeware (or read it online): http://www.google.com/advanced_group_search?q=+group:alt.comp.freeware Pricelessware & ACF: http://www.pricelesswarehome.org Pricelessware: http://www.pricelessware.org (not maintained)
From: M.L. on 23 Jan 2010 14:36 >> I am satisfied enough to have freeware apps merely brought to my >> attention. If I want more info I can just click on the handy link >> provided. There is room here for both FYI and descriptive posts. > >I like Wasbit's lists too. I'm *hoping* he'll encourage discussion of >the apps when he posts a list. > >I don't see lists and discussion as an either/or kind of thing. IMO >lists of apps and discussion of the apps on the list go together like >ham and eggs, bread and butter. . . I think if the OP had wanted to add his commentary he would have done so without prodding. He did his part to trigger discussion by bringing 100+ apps to our attention. Responders should have made use of one of the provided links to start a discussion of their own.
From: Susan Bugher on 23 Jan 2010 16:23 M.L. wrote: > I think if the OP had wanted to add his commentary he would have done > so without prodding. He did his part to trigger discussion by bringing > 100+ apps to our attention. Responders should have made use of one of > the provided links to start a discussion of their own. Why all the loaded language? I made a request (please ask for comments). I did NOT suggest the OP had not "done his part" and the OP is free to ignore my "prodding". I don't think potential responders "should have" done anything. I *DO* think it would be interesting if people posted comments about the apps and I suggested encouraging them to make such responses. IMO threads about "my favorite Freeware" tend to suffer from a lack of focus. IMO threads discussing "PDF Freeware" or "text editors" etc. are more interesting. IMO lists of apps and discussion of the apps on the list go together like ham and eggs. YMMV Susan -- Posted to alt.comp.freeware Search alt.comp.freeware (or read it online): http://www.google.com/advanced_group_search?q=+group:alt.comp.freeware Pricelessware & ACF: http://www.pricelesswarehome.org Pricelessware: http://www.pricelessware.org (not maintained)
From: Bear Bottoms on 23 Jan 2010 17:10
Bear Bottoms <bearbottoms1(a)gmai.com> wrote in news:Xns9D099D806D773bearbottoms1gmaicom(a)69.16.185.247: > > Susan Bugher <sebugher(a)yahoo.com> wrote in news:7s17hgFgklU1 > @mid.individual.net: >> >> Why all the loaded language? > > Pay attention to your language and stop questioning other's choices. You forager! -- Bear Bottoms Freeware website: http://bearware.com |