More PDF Freeware - 100+
in [Freeware]
|
From: John Corliss on 22 Jan 2010 03:19 Yrrah wrote: > wasbit wrote: > >> PDF Utilities: > > Have you used them? Can you comment on them? Yrrah, there's no "rule" or even a guideline that says everybody has to use every program they post links to. I, for one, like wasbit's comprehensive lists; they save me a lot of time. On top of that, wasbit provided this info about the programs: >> ffpu = Free For Personal Use >> hpnf = Home Page Not Found >> nffhp = Not Free From Home Page (although may be free from elsewhere) >> nfohp = Not Found on Home Page (but still available from given Url) That represents a lot of work. Not sure why you would post your reply. -- John Corliss BS206. I block all Google Groups posts due to Googlespam, and as many posts from anonymous remailers (like x-privat.org for eg.) as possible due to forgeries posted through them. No ad, cd, commercial, cripple, demo, nag, share, spy, time-limited, trial or web wares OR warez for me, please.
From: John Corliss on 22 Jan 2010 03:41 John Corliss wrote: > Yrrah wrote: >> wasbit wrote: >> >>> PDF Utilities: >> >> Have you used them? Can you comment on them? > > Yrrah, there's no "rule" or even a guideline that says everybody has to > use every program they post links to. I, for one, like wasbit's > comprehensive lists; they save me a lot of time. On top of that, wasbit > provided this info about the programs: > >>> ffpu = Free For Personal Use >>> hpnf = Home Page Not Found >>> nffhp = Not Free From Home Page (although may be free from elsewhere) >>> nfohp = Not Found on Home Page (but still available from given Url) > > That represents a lot of work. > > Not sure why you would post your reply. That is, unless don't like anybody posting links for alternatives to PDF-XChange Viewer (which I use and really like.) -- John Corliss BS206. I block all Google Groups posts due to Googlespam, and as many posts from anonymous remailers (like x-privat.org for eg.) as possible due to forgeries posted through them. No ad, cd, commercial, cripple, demo, nag, share, spy, time-limited, trial or web wares OR warez for me, please.
From: za kAT on 22 Jan 2010 10:48 On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 14:42:51 GMT, Bear Bottoms wrote: > nasty history of abuse Yes you have Bear Bottoms [bearbottoms1(a)gmai.com]. It about time you learnt some humility, and apologised to acf for the years of trolling, lies, and unfounded allegations. Flagellation optional, but preferred. -- zakAT(a)pooh.the.cat
From: Susan Bugher on 22 Jan 2010 11:55 Yrrah wrote: > "wasbit" <wasbit(a)live.co.ok>: >> PDF Utilities: > > Have you used them? Can you comment on them? IMO those are good questions for the whole group. I'd like to see more discussion of the pros and cons of the apps people use (or have tried). Wasbit, could you, would you add the questions when you post a reference list? Please. . . Pretty please. . . Pretty please with sugar on it. ;) Susan (information junkie) -- Posted to alt.comp.freeware Search alt.comp.freeware (or read it online): http://www.google.com/advanced_group_search?q=+group:alt.comp.freeware Pricelessware & ACF: http://www.pricelesswarehome.org Pricelessware: http://www.pricelessware.org (not maintained)
From: H-Man on 22 Jan 2010 13:03
On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 14:42:51 GMT, Bear Bottoms wrote: > Yrrah <Yrrah-acf(a)acf.invalid> wrote in > news:umcjl55pvbkf48o9p07v430a9k87jnopph(a)net.com: > >> John Corliss <q34wsk20(a)yahoo.com>: >> >>> > Have you used them? Can you comment on them? >> >>> Yrrah, there's no "rule" or even a guideline that says everybody has >>> to use every program they post links to. >> >> John, I asked two important (to me) questions. What's wrong with that? >> >> Yrrah >> > > Yrrah, had he had additional comments he wanted to make, he would have > made them. You have a nasty history of abuse...that is what is wrong > with your comments and the way you make them. I think Yrrah's questions might have been misunderstood. By virtue of the fact that the OP had done this much research into this, it would be a reasonably safe assumption that the OP had required some PDF software in the past at some point. If not then that's fine too, but when I read Yrrah's post I though the same. If you read the post not as an accusation but as a request, it seems a fair request at that. If the OP had nothing more to share then that's every bit as fair IMO. -- HK |