From: Brad Rogers on 17 Mar 2010 16:00 On Wed, 17 Mar 2010 10:01:10 -0400 (EDT) Stephen Powell <zlinuxman(a)wowway.com> wrote: Hello Stephen, > You're welcome, but I am disappointed too. I'm curious to know what So, it's not just me then? :-) > the failure symptom was. Did it complain that the chipset override was The error message was unsupported device, nothing about the chipset override. Followed by "Fatal server error no screens found". Which is obvious, since no valid driver was available. > the server? Or did it work for a while and then freeze up? What was > the symptom of the failure? The screen blacked momentarily, no doubt whilst trying to honour the configuration, but almost immediately dropped back to the command line. The time was no more than 1 second. -- Regards _ / ) "The blindingly obvious is / _)rad never immediately apparent" Where will you be when the bodies burn? The Gasman Cometh - Crass
From: Stephen Powell on 17 Mar 2010 16:40 On Wed, 17 Mar 2010 14:19:40 -0400 (EDT), Brad Rogers wrote: > Stephen Powell wrote: >> You're welcome, but I am disappointed too. I'm curious to know what >> the failure symptom was. Did it complain that the chipset override was >> invalid? Or did it accept the chipset override but fail to initialize >> the server? Or did it work for a while and then freeze up? What >> was the symptom of the failure? > > The error message was unsupported device, nothing about the chipset > override. Followed by "Fatal server error no screens found". Which is > obvious, since no valid driver was available. > > The screen blacked momentarily, no doubt whilst trying to honour the > configuration, but almost immediately dropped back to the command line. > The time was no more than 1 second. If you just want to give up, that's OK; but I'm willing to keep trying if you are. If you are willing to keep trying, please post the exact /etc/X11/xorg.conf file that you used and the exact /var/log/Xorg.0.log file that resulted. If it took the chipset override without complaint, that's a good sign! That means that we've figured out the correct way to override the chipset. When we tried Chipset "G80" we got "ignoring unsupported chipset", remember? And you didn't get that this time, right? That's good! My hunch is that we will have to hard code the bus id. If you don't, it goes looking for one that it supports, and that may be where it rejects the board as unsupported. Hard coding the bus id may force it to accept the board. But I don't want to get ahead of myself. Please post the two files above and I'll have another look. We have made progress. We're not done yet. We may not be able to reach the end of the road. But we are making forward progress; so I don't want to give up just yet. -- .''`. Stephen Powell <zlinuxman(a)wowway.com> : :' : `. `'` `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST(a)lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster(a)lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/104345394.19874381268857801671.JavaMail.root(a)md01.wow.synacor.com
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 Prev: If you have a hardwood floor, times have changed. Next: music in second live / Emerald |