NASA Caught in Climate Data Manipulation
in [Physics]
|
Prev: Quick Question
Next: Foundations of operations management, second canadian edition 2e ritzman malhotra krajwsky solutions manual
From: erschroedinger on 15 Jan 2010 13:48 On Jan 15, 12:59 pm, Mike Jr <n00s...(a)comcast.net> wrote: > On Jan 15, 12:21 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On 1/15/10 7:51 AM, Mike Jr wrote: > > > > On Jan 14, 11:35 pm, Sam Wormley<sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > >> On 1/14/10 6:15 PM, Mike Jr wrote: > > > >>> "Climate researchers have discovered that NASA researchers improperly > > >>> manipulated data in order to claim 2005 as "THE WARMEST YEAR ON > > >>> RECORD." > > > >> 2007 topped that. > > > > Dancing around the point, that being fraud? > > > > Or is fraud in the pursuit of the right cause justified? > > > > --Mike Jr. > > > Top 11 Warmest Years On Record Have All Been In Last 13 Years > > http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/12/071213101419.htm > > > 2007 Was Tied As Earth's Second Warmest Year > > http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/01/080116114150.htm > > http://www.sciencedaily.com/images/2008/01/080116114150-large.jpg > > > Global surface (land and sea) temperature increase > > >http://www.pewclimate.org/docUploads/images/global-surface-temp-trend... > > Sam, > Please read my links. The data that those records are based on is > manufactured garbage. Mike, please read some science. Your allegation is ridiculous. > > "Figures never lie but liars always figure". > > Take your time; let it sink in. There. > > --Mike Jr.
From: john on 15 Jan 2010 16:37 On Jan 15, 12:32 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On 1/15/10 9:54 AM, john wrote: > > > > > > > > > In North America, the thermometers > > have been migrating to the coasts. > > (California uses just four- three on the > > LA beaches and one at an airport- perhaps > > on its way to the beach!) > > In Africa they have been migrating the other way- > > away from the cooler coasts and towards the > > hotter central plains. > > Also there has been a migration from higher > > elevations in Europe and NA to lower ones. > > > THIS is the way they get the > > results they want- sleight of land!! :-) > > > john > > Ya think, John!- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - You have to actually read the links, Sam. Obviously, you haven't. john
From: Benj on 15 Jan 2010 16:48 On Jan 15, 12:21 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Top 11 Warmest Years On Record Have All Been In Last 13 Years > http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/12/071213101419.htm Sam-bot as usual "counters" fudged data with propaganda lies. Hey SAM! The fudged data was used to calculate the lies you claim are true! Are you rich yet?
From: Benj on 15 Jan 2010 16:50 On Jan 15, 4:37 pm, john <vega...(a)accesscomm.ca> wrote: > You have to actually read the links, Sam. > Obviously, you haven't. > > john Who needs to read stinkin' links? Sam already knows what he's going to say!
From: Brian on 15 Jan 2010 17:23
"Mike Jr" <n00spam(a)comcast.net> wrote in message news:b6877501-1aaf-4ee0-b3f4-4fb818752977(a)a1g2000vbl.googlegroups.com... On Jan 15, 1:17 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On 1/15/10 11:59 AM, Mike Jr wrote: > > > > > On Jan 15, 12:21 pm, Sam Wormley<sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> Top 11 Warmest Years On Record Have All Been In Last 13 Years > >> http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/12/071213101419.htm > > >> 2007 Was Tied As Earth's Second Warmest Year > >> http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/01/080116114150.htm > >> http://www.sciencedaily.com/images/2008/01/080116114150-large.jpg > > >> Global surface (land and sea) temperature increase > > >>http://www.pewclimate.org/docUploads/images/global-surface-temp-trend... > > > Sam, > > Please read my links. The data that those records are based on is > > manufactured garbage. > > What convince you that the data is manufactured garbage, Mike. Is > that what you want to believe? Or do you have the "real" data? > What is your evidence that the climatological data is wrong? > Seriously! >Seriously. Read the links to see the evidence. I wouldn't point you >to it if I didn't think that this was serious. >--Mike Jr. the data keeps changing J-D annual means for 1998 is 58 http://web.archive.org/web/20001206235400/http://www.giss.nasa.gov/data/update/gistemp/GLB.Ts+dSST.txt J-D annual means for 1998 is 56 and 2005 is 58 http://web.archive.org/web/20060206055540/http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/tabledata/GLB.Ts+dSST.txt J-D annual means for 1998 is 57, 2005 is 62 and 2007 is 56 http://web.archive.org/web/20080719094751/http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/tabledata/GLB.Ts+dSST.txt J-D annual means for 1998 is 56, 2005 is 63 and 2007 is 57 http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/tabledata/GLB.Ts+dSST.txt |