From: John Navas on 2 Jul 2010 10:14 On Thu, 01 Jul 2010 22:17:50 +0000, in <Xns9DA8BA2762B83noonehomecom(a)74.209.131.13>, Larry <noone(a)home.com> wrote: >John Navas <jncl1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote in >news:p02q26lqqaqqntktq2p5oint83bbea6cut(a)4ax.com: > >> Galaxy S has been announced for all four major US carriers. > >>Network >>HSUPA 900/1900/2100 >>EDGE/GPRS 850/ 900/1800/1900 > >That's gonna be a real trick if it only covers these..... >Maybe their definition of "major US carrier" is different from mine. >Mine includes VERIZON WIRELESS......not T-mobile. "Samsung unveils Galaxy S models for Sprint, Verizon, U.S. Cellular" <http://www.cnet.com/8301-19736_1-20008968-251.html> It's called the Samsung Fascinate. <http://www.mobiledia.com/phones/samsung/fascinate.html> -- Best regards, John If the iPhone and iPad are really so impressive, then why do iFans keep making excuses for them?
From: Larry on 2 Jul 2010 23:08 John Navas <jncl1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote in news:1usr26tfqchb1d82n29rgk4ov1ncapc2ci(a)4ax.com: > Best regards, > John > Thanks... -- Global Warming and Creationism are to science what storks are to obstetrics... Larry
From: John Navas on 20 Jul 2010 11:49 Samsung's Galaxy S Hailed as True Rival for iPhone in U.S. Samsung Electronics' Android-powered Galaxy S smartphone, which launched in the U.S. last week, won strong praise in a review by Fortune magazine on Sunday. Seth Weintraub, an IT columnist for the U.S. business magazine, called the device "incredible," lauding its screen, weight and form factor as "the best available in any phone right now, bar none." Weintraub compared the Galaxy S, sold in the U.S. as the Vibrant through T-Mobile and the Captivate via AT&T, with Apple's iPhone 4 and HTC's EVO and Aria. He praised the Korean smartphone's screen and viewing angles as better than those of the iPhone, thanks to its larger four-inch super AMOLED display. He also complimented the Galaxy S for its lightness. Despite its larger display, it weighs 117.9 g, a whopping 20 g or 14 percent less than the iPhone 4. While the 5-megapixel camera on the Galaxy S has no flash, the columnist said it performs very well even in low-light conditions. He called its speakers "solid but not spectacular," but noted that he "had no problem watching a movie in ambient noise of an office or home." MORE: <http://english.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2010/07/20/2010072000434.html>
From: nospam on 20 Jul 2010 12:06 In article <89hb46hindujg7sk95c4c3j55p804ucufg(a)4ax.com>, John Navas <spamfilter1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote: > Samsung's Galaxy S Hailed as True Rival for iPhone in U.S. > > Samsung Electronics' Android-powered Galaxy S smartphone, which launched > in the U.S. last week, won strong praise in a review by Fortune magazine > on Sunday. just don't hold it wrong <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BolQ9o_-Q68>
From: Larry on 20 Jul 2010 18:21 John Navas <spamfilter1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote in news:89hb46hindujg7sk95c4c3j55p804ucufg(a)4ax.com: > Samsung's Galaxy S Er, ah, John? I reported on Galaxy S the day the Droid X came out as Galaxy S came out on T-mo the same day.... -- iPhone 4 is to cellular technology what the Titanic is to cruise ships. Larry
First
|
Prev
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 Prev: NEWS: Will iPhone 4's woes help Android? Next: higher speed with wireless than wired! |