From: Jud on
In article <k7-dnTf_IPH2_ofRnZ2dnUVZ_jWdnZ2d(a)speakeasy.net>,
News(a)Group.Name says...
> John Navas wrote:
> > Tablets look set a displace the netbook, if figures from market watcher
> > DisplaySearch are to be believed.
>
> Will reverse as soon as word gets out that current tablets are woefully
> inadequate, under-performing netbooks and an untenable form factor pda.
>

What really bugs me about the iPad and recent "tablets" is that they are
so far from being a "REAL" tablet pc that they need a new term, maybe
"app-pad" or something.

FWIW there ARE real tablets on the market, and have been for years, that
are full-function PCs that run everything modern laptops and desktops
can run--plus pen-centric stuff you can't even run on standard pcs. I do
90% of my day-to-day PC work on a 5 year old Motion M1400 tablet
(complete with docking station, keyboard, mouse, extended desktop on 2nd
monitor, and multiple usb hubs) and it's 1.1Ghz Pentium M/2GB memory is
ancient compared to the multi-core models available now.
--
Jud
Dallas TX USA
From: Larry on
Jud <I5i5changethistodash5rbo(a)xemaps.com> wrote in
news:MPG.26856575f940b951989684(a)news.albasani.net:

> What really bugs me about the iPad and recent "tablets" is that they are
> so far from being a "REAL" tablet pc that they need a new term, maybe
> "app-pad" or something.
>
>

We could call it "WebTV", but I think that name is branded and we'd get
sued....(c;]

iPad is just another WebTV device....connecting to the cloud.


--
http://www.goveg.com/feat/agriprocessors/responseToOUStatement.asp
Watch the FULL video. I dare ya! Shechitah barbarians!

Larry

From: nospam on
In article <MPG.26856575f940b951989684(a)news.albasani.net>, Jud
<I5i5changethistodash5rbo(a)xemaps.com> wrote:

> What really bugs me about the iPad and recent "tablets" is that they are
> so far from being a "REAL" tablet pc that they need a new term, maybe
> "app-pad" or something.

where is this definition written?

> FWIW there ARE real tablets on the market, and have been for years, that
> are full-function PCs that run everything modern laptops and desktops
> can run--plus pen-centric stuff you can't even run on standard pcs. I do
> 90% of my day-to-day PC work on a 5 year old Motion M1400 tablet
> (complete with docking station, keyboard, mouse, extended desktop on 2nd
> monitor, and multiple usb hubs) and it's 1.1Ghz Pentium M/2GB memory is
> ancient compared to the multi-core models available now.

and they didn't sell very well.

it's not what people actually want.
From: News on
Jud wrote:
> In article <k7-dnTf_IPH2_ofRnZ2dnUVZ_jWdnZ2d(a)speakeasy.net>,
> News(a)Group.Name says...
>> John Navas wrote:
>>> Tablets look set a displace the netbook, if figures from market watcher
>>> DisplaySearch are to be believed.
>> Will reverse as soon as word gets out that current tablets are woefully
>> inadequate, under-performing netbooks and an untenable form factor pda.
>>
>
> What really bugs me about the iPad and recent "tablets" is that they are
> so far from being a "REAL" tablet pc that they need a new term, maybe
> "app-pad" or something.

maxiPads

>
> FWIW there ARE real tablets on the market, and have been for years, that
> are full-function PCs that run everything modern laptops and desktops
> can run--plus pen-centric stuff you can't even run on standard pcs. I do
> 90% of my day-to-day PC work on a 5 year old Motion M1400 tablet
> (complete with docking station, keyboard, mouse, extended desktop on 2nd
> monitor, and multiple usb hubs) and it's 1.1Ghz Pentium M/2GB memory is
> ancient compared to the multi-core models available now.


All of which leave maxiPads in the sanitary circular file
From: "John B. Coarsey, PE" jcoarsey on

"News" <News(a)Group.Name> wrote in message
news:MaCdnfZb4sULI4bRnZ2dnUVZ_jmdnZ2d(a)speakeasy.net...
> Jud wrote:
>> In article <k7-dnTf_IPH2_ofRnZ2dnUVZ_jWdnZ2d(a)speakeasy.net>,
>> News(a)Group.Name says...
>>> John Navas wrote:
>>>> Tablets look set a displace the netbook, if figures from market watcher
>>>> DisplaySearch are to be believed.
>>> Will reverse as soon as word gets out that current tablets are woefully
>>> inadequate, under-performing netbooks and an untenable form factor pda.
>>>
>>
>> What really bugs me about the iPad and recent "tablets" is that they are
>> so far from being a "REAL" tablet pc that they need a new term, maybe
>> "app-pad" or something.
>
> maxiPads
>
>>
>> FWIW there ARE real tablets on the market, and have been for years, that
>> are full-function PCs that run everything modern laptops and desktops can
>> run--plus pen-centric stuff you can't even run on standard pcs. I do 90%
>> of my day-to-day PC work on a 5 year old Motion M1400 tablet (complete
>> with docking station, keyboard, mouse, extended desktop on 2nd monitor,
>> and multiple usb hubs) and it's 1.1Ghz Pentium M/2GB memory is ancient
>> compared to the multi-core models available now.
>
>
> All of which leave maxiPads in the sanitary circular file

Over 2,000,000 people have disageed with you by voting with their wallets.
Just for fun how many real people can you round up that even remotely agree
with you? By agree with you I mean that are equally viscous Apple haters. I
know you can get Larry and Mark and a few others but far less than
2,000,000. That pretty much leaves you pissing in the wind. Eh?