From: John Navas on
On Sat, 19 Jun 2010 07:28:23 -0400, in
<hvi9kp$434$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>, "Tom" <tc(a)comcast.net> wrote:

>the Ipad fits my needs, portable, long battery life, easy to read books with
>old eyes, some internet access almost anywhere, photos, music, etc many
>things to keep me amused.

To my eyes the Kindle display is much easier to read for long periods of
time.

--
Best regards,
John

If the iPhone and iPad are really so impressive,
then why do iFans keep making excuses for them?
From: Larry on
John Navas <jncl1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote in
news:upkp16ptivt7pef872hu0hr7p815mcibm7(a)4ax.com:

> To my eyes the Kindle display is much easier to read for long periods of
> time.
>

Absolutely! There's no comparison to the Kindle in bright sunlight. The
brighter the sun shines on it, the brighter the display as it's sunlit, not
backlit.

Looking through that damned mirror is just awful outdoors.


--
Creationism is to science what storks are to obstetrics...

Larry

From: nospam on
In article <Xns9D9CDB7C6F3B8noonehomecom(a)74.209.131.13>, Larry
<noone(a)home.com> wrote:

> Absolutely! There's no comparison to the Kindle in bright sunlight. The
> brighter the sun shines on it, the brighter the display as it's sunlit, not
> backlit.

which is great if you are outside. most people don't read books
outside, they read them *inside*, especially when the weather is not
all that great.

there is even a kindle clip-on light because the screen is not usable
in dim light, such as reading in bed.

<http://www.amazon.com/Mighty-Bright-XtraFlex2-Frustration-Free-Packagin
g/dp/B002CMLDT6/>

> Looking through that damned mirror is just awful outdoors.

i don't doubt it. having to see your face is sheer terror.
From: DevilsPGD on
In message <Xns9D9CDB7C6F3B8noonehomecom(a)74.209.131.13> Larry
<noone(a)home.com> was claimed to have wrote:

>John Navas <jncl1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote in
>news:upkp16ptivt7pef872hu0hr7p815mcibm7(a)4ax.com:
>
>> To my eyes the Kindle display is much easier to read for long periods of
>> time.
>>
>
>Absolutely! There's no comparison to the Kindle in bright sunlight. The
>brighter the sun shines on it, the brighter the display as it's sunlit, not
>backlit.

Fantastic. Now try that again in a dimly lit plane in a seat with the
light unfortunately located slightly ahead of you, or when your partner
is sleeping in bed beside you.

Neither is ideal in all situations.
From: John Navas on
On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 02:18:04 -0700, in
<hjst161bkq26rc1djmtl95j7nk0tl7utso(a)4ax.com>, DevilsPGD
<Still-Just-A-Rat-In-A-Cage(a)crazyhat.net> wrote:

>In message <Xns9D9CDB7C6F3B8noonehomecom(a)74.209.131.13> Larry
><noone(a)home.com> was claimed to have wrote:
>
>>John Navas <jncl1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote in
>>news:upkp16ptivt7pef872hu0hr7p815mcibm7(a)4ax.com:
>>
>>> To my eyes the Kindle display is much easier to read for long periods of
>>> time.
>>
>>Absolutely! There's no comparison to the Kindle in bright sunlight. The
>>brighter the sun shines on it, the brighter the display as it's sunlit, not
>>backlit.
>
>Fantastic. Now try that again in a dimly lit plane in a seat with the
>light unfortunately located slightly ahead of you, or when your partner
>is sleeping in bed beside you.
>
>Neither is ideal in all situations.

True, but the Kindle display is easier to read in the most common
conditions, and works quite nicely with an Itty Bitty Book Light,
whereas nothing will help the iPad out in the sun (e.g., at a park
or the beach).

--
Best regards,
John

If the iPhone and iPad are really so impressive,
then why do iFans keep making excuses for them?