From: John Woodgate on
In message <C0FAF726.3DAFF%dbowey(a)comcast.net>, dated Sun, 6 Aug 2006,
Don Bowey <dbowey(a)comcast.net> writes
>On 8/5/06 10:42 PM, in article Iba0qqBEFY1EFwi8(a)jmwa.demon.co.uk, "John
>Woodgate" <jmw(a)jmwa.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> In message <C0FAA143.3DA13%dbowey(a)comcast.net>, dated Sat, 5 Aug 2006,
>> Don Bowey <dbowey(a)comcast.net> writes
>>
>>> Gee, and all this time I thought an agenda could contain a bias based
>>> on personal or company "wants." And sore agendas exist due to anger or
>>> displeasure with people or companies." My golly, perhaps my
>>> observations while working on Standards Committees is wrong?
>>
>> All standards committees are wholly impartial and are never influenced
>> by personal or company 'wants'. Anger or displeasure are never expressed
>> in agendas, which are written so as to be utterly even-handed and
>> dispassionate.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Aren't they?
>
>I would like to think that what you say is true today.
>
>
So would I! (;-)
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk
2006 is YMMVI- Your mileage may vary immensely.

John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK
From: John Fields on
On Sat, 5 Aug 2006 18:42:01 +0100, John Woodgate
<jmw(a)jmwa.demon.co.uk> wrote:

>In message <C0FA166B.3D8DB%dbowey(a)comcast.net>, dated Sat, 5 Aug 2006,
>Don Bowey <dbowey(a)comcast.net> writes
>>Do you have some facts for that? What are the criteria for the
>>ranking?
>
>One issue is that they won't let the Kurds have their own whey.

---
Pretty cheesy argument...


--
John Fields
Professional Circuit Designer
From: John Fields on
On Sat, 5 Aug 2006 18:42:44 +0100, John Woodgate
<jmw(a)jmwa.demon.co.uk> wrote:

>In message <44D4D23A.60914DA(a)REMOVETHIS.hotmail.com>, dated Sat, 5 Aug
>2006, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)REMOVETHIS.hotmail.com> writes
>>Are you entirely incapable of absorbing anything I say ?
>
>There's no so deaf as them that won't hear.

---
'None', no?

--
John Fields
Professional Circuit Designer
From: John Fields on
On 5 Aug 2006 11:16:38 -0700, bill.sloman(a)ieee.org wrote:

>
>John Fields wrote:
>> On 3 Aug 2006 15:19:07 -0700, bill.sloman(a)ieee.org wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >John Fields wrote:
>>
>> >> ---
>> >> I write at several levels simultaneously. Didn't you notice? ;)
>> >
>> >Nice try.
>>
>> ---
>> That's a 'no', then?
>
>Have you stopped beating your significant other?

---
No, Chess just isn't her game, it seems.

--
John Fields
Professional Circuit Designer
From: John Fields on
On Sat, 05 Aug 2006 21:15:08 +0100, Eeyore
<rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)REMOVETHIS.hotmail.com> wrote:

>Your nose is severely out of joint. Let me help you with that - SMACK ! Maybe that's something
>you could comprehend ?

---
Oh, my! When you can't win verbally you resort to "the hated"
physical violence?


--
John Fields
Professional Circuit Designer