From: John Woodgate on 6 Aug 2006 05:23 In message <C0FAF726.3DAFF%dbowey(a)comcast.net>, dated Sun, 6 Aug 2006, Don Bowey <dbowey(a)comcast.net> writes >On 8/5/06 10:42 PM, in article Iba0qqBEFY1EFwi8(a)jmwa.demon.co.uk, "John >Woodgate" <jmw(a)jmwa.demon.co.uk> wrote: > >> In message <C0FAA143.3DA13%dbowey(a)comcast.net>, dated Sat, 5 Aug 2006, >> Don Bowey <dbowey(a)comcast.net> writes >> >>> Gee, and all this time I thought an agenda could contain a bias based >>> on personal or company "wants." And sore agendas exist due to anger or >>> displeasure with people or companies." My golly, perhaps my >>> observations while working on Standards Committees is wrong? >> >> All standards committees are wholly impartial and are never influenced >> by personal or company 'wants'. Anger or displeasure are never expressed >> in agendas, which are written so as to be utterly even-handed and >> dispassionate. >> >> >> >> >> Aren't they? > >I would like to think that what you say is true today. > > So would I! (;-) -- OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk 2006 is YMMVI- Your mileage may vary immensely. John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK
From: John Fields on 6 Aug 2006 06:52 On Sat, 5 Aug 2006 18:42:01 +0100, John Woodgate <jmw(a)jmwa.demon.co.uk> wrote: >In message <C0FA166B.3D8DB%dbowey(a)comcast.net>, dated Sat, 5 Aug 2006, >Don Bowey <dbowey(a)comcast.net> writes >>Do you have some facts for that? What are the criteria for the >>ranking? > >One issue is that they won't let the Kurds have their own whey. --- Pretty cheesy argument... -- John Fields Professional Circuit Designer
From: John Fields on 6 Aug 2006 06:53 On Sat, 5 Aug 2006 18:42:44 +0100, John Woodgate <jmw(a)jmwa.demon.co.uk> wrote: >In message <44D4D23A.60914DA(a)REMOVETHIS.hotmail.com>, dated Sat, 5 Aug >2006, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)REMOVETHIS.hotmail.com> writes >>Are you entirely incapable of absorbing anything I say ? > >There's no so deaf as them that won't hear. --- 'None', no? -- John Fields Professional Circuit Designer
From: John Fields on 6 Aug 2006 07:00 On 5 Aug 2006 11:16:38 -0700, bill.sloman(a)ieee.org wrote: > >John Fields wrote: >> On 3 Aug 2006 15:19:07 -0700, bill.sloman(a)ieee.org wrote: >> >> > >> >John Fields wrote: >> >> >> --- >> >> I write at several levels simultaneously. Didn't you notice? ;) >> > >> >Nice try. >> >> --- >> That's a 'no', then? > >Have you stopped beating your significant other? --- No, Chess just isn't her game, it seems. -- John Fields Professional Circuit Designer
From: John Fields on 6 Aug 2006 07:26
On Sat, 05 Aug 2006 21:15:08 +0100, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)REMOVETHIS.hotmail.com> wrote: >Your nose is severely out of joint. Let me help you with that - SMACK ! Maybe that's something >you could comprehend ? --- Oh, my! When you can't win verbally you resort to "the hated" physical violence? -- John Fields Professional Circuit Designer |