New Book of Rules
in [Design]
|
From: Ken Smith on 7 Aug 2006 23:03 In article <r3tfd2hh7d696bv1n2lhar9j85ufom5slc(a)4ax.com>, Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon(a)My-Web-Site.com> wrote: [...] >"Phat Bytestard" is heading quickly to the plonk bin... his only >argument is very Bloggs-like, name-call :-( > >Of course, when I refer to "leftist weenies", I'm not name-calling ;-) You *are* one blithering right wing nut case that is worth reading for the technical knowledge, so I won't be kill filing you any time soon you Nazi :> -- -- kensmith(a)rahul.net forging knowledge
From: Phat Bytestard on 7 Aug 2006 23:53 On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 18:16:59 +0200, "Frank Bemelman" <f.bemelmanq(a)xs4all.invalid.nl> Gave us: >"John Fields" <jfields(a)austininstruments.com> schreef in bericht >news:76jed29m8vpqd407nngk8nicilmh0mkn65(a)4ax.com... >> >> If you have a bloodless solution which would keep everyone involved >> happy or, at the very least, a compromise which everyone could live >> with, I'm sure we'd _all_ be overjoyed to hear it. > >That solution has been there, and has been fucked up 100% by your >terrorist leaders. > You're a goddamned idiot. >But you're blind and deaf if not totally brainwashed. Still in >the fase of denial. You're a goddaamned total retard. You starred in that movie "Total Retard", I just know it.
From: Phat Bytestard on 7 Aug 2006 23:56 On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 17:21:46 +0100, "Reg Edwards" <g4fgq.regp(a)ZZZbtinternet.com> Gave us: >Have the bridges across the Blue Danube, destroyed by senseless USA >destruction of Yugoslavian infrastructure, been replaced yet? You're a goddamned idiot. >Or do children on their way to school still have to go by boat. > >I very much doubt it. You could be a bit more retarded, but not today.
From: Phat Bytestard on 7 Aug 2006 23:58 On Mon, 07 Aug 2006 11:48:39 -0500, John Fields <jfields(a)austininstruments.com> Gave us: >On Sun, 6 Aug 2006 19:17:31 +0100, John Woodgate ><jmw(a)jmwa.demon.co.uk> wrote: > >>In message <mobcd21on0nq07p650eslhlf52ulip0jsm(a)4ax.com>, dated Sun, 6 >>Aug 2006, John Fields <jfields(a)austininstruments.com> writes >> >>>Well, I think it's safe to say that a nice Stilton could hold its own >>>when confronted by a Roquefort, especially when the heat's on. >> >>Possibly, but Limburger is a WMD. > >--- ><G> WMOD Weapon of Mass Olfactory Destruction
From: Phat Bytestard on 8 Aug 2006 00:00
On Mon, 07 Aug 2006 18:11:49 +0100, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)REMOVETHIS.hotmail.com> Gave us: > > >John Fields wrote: > >> On Sun, 06 Aug 2006 20:00:40 +0100, Eeyore >> <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)REMOVETHIS.hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >Jim Yanik wrote: >> > >> >> Saddam was using Oil-for-Food money to rebuild his palaces and fund WMD >> >> programs >> > >> >There weren't any WMDs ! >> > >> >How many times do you need to be reminded ? >> >> There were no WMDs found because they were moved before we got >> there. > >A few ppl like to believe that. Is there any evidence of this ? > You're kidding, right? So, you selectively gather history in your brain. How do you manage that? Do you sleep through some days' events? You missed a lot over the last couple decades. |