New Book of Rules
in [Design]
|
From: John Woodgate on 11 Aug 2006 01:46 In message <ihond2ded94j3m4l7s9qro9el11a37v0ts(a)4ax.com>, dated Thu, 10 Aug 2006, John Larkin <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> writes >On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 22:05:48 +0100, John Woodgate ><jmw(a)jmwa.demon.co.uk> wrote: > >>In message <Xns981BA62AFFF97jyanikkuanet(a)129.250.170.84>, dated Thu, 10 >>Aug 2006, Jim Yanik <jyanik(a)abuse.gov> writes >> >>>Muslims are required by the Koran to spread the Faith,by sword if >>>necessary. >> >>Jim, you can find words like that in the New Testament, too. >> >>>Infidels must not be tolerated(must be converted or killed),and "People >>>of the Book" must submit and pay the poll tax,or Jizya,or convert to >>>Islam. >>> >>>There's no such thing as "Christian soil" to Muslims. >> >>No, but there IS to militant Christians, and to White Supremacists. >> >>>It's merely infidel land to be conquered. >> >>Well, the Crusaders had similar views 600 years ago. When Christianity >>was as old as Islam is now. > >Oh, great, eveybody will get along in 600 years from now. > It may not take as long this time round, but it will take more time than we would like. -- OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk 2006 is YMMVI- Your mileage may vary immensely. John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK
From: John Woodgate on 11 Aug 2006 01:50 In message <44DBB6A2.4F51FC48(a)REMOVETHIS.hotmail.com>, dated Thu, 10 Aug 2006, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)REMOVETHIS.hotmail.com> writes > > >John Woodgate wrote: > >> In message <44DB82A4.D14AA9B3(a)REMOVETHIS.hotmail.com>, dated Thu, 10 Aug >> 2006, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)REMOVETHIS.hotmail.com> writes >> >> >I just saw an intelligent American counter-terrorism expert interviewed >> >on our Channel 4 News who said that the reasons for terrorist action >> >against the West is on account primarily because of our troops being on >> >'Islamic soil'. >> >> That's not the least bit intelligent. It immediately raises the question >> of "what all these Muslim immigrants are doing here on our 'Christian >> soil'". BNP-fodder! > >You seriously don't want to go there do you ? > I don't know what you mean. I certainly will raise any matter that seems to me to be germane and significant, and the use of that phrase is both. The last thing we want is a backlash, either from militant Christian sects or White Supremacists. -- OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk 2006 is YMMVI- Your mileage may vary immensely. John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK
From: Paul Burke on 11 Aug 2006 03:14 John Woodgate wrote: >> Mussolini wasn't benign, > > True, but the Italians thought he was, to begin with. SOME italians thought he was. The opposition had few illusions, assuming they could still walk. Paul Burke
From: joseph2k on 11 Aug 2006 07:03 Fred Abse wrote: > On Sat, 05 Aug 2006 08:24:55 -0700, Jim Thompson wrote: > >> demoncrats® > > Shouldn't that have been "demonrats"? > > ;-) > > Personally i use Democreeps. It better reflects their socially necrotizing policies. -- JosephKK Gegen dummheit kampfen die Gotter Selbst, vergebens. --Schiller
From: joseph2k on 11 Aug 2006 07:06
John Fields wrote: > On Sat, 5 Aug 2006 07:29:58 +0100, John Woodgate > <jmw(a)jmwa.demon.co.uk> wrote: > >>In message <7mg7d2d0php4ti2vnnotee89pfuahp8dde(a)4ax.com>, dated Fri, 4 >>Aug 2006, John Fields <jfields(a)austininstruments.com> writes >>>I don't know who you mean. >> >>I think you (or is it JT?) call them 'demoncrats'. > > --- > Call me thick, but I still can't grasp the relationship. > > That is, I don't get it. Clue? > > Somewhat oversimplified it is called demonizing your opponent. -- JosephKK Gegen dummheit kampfen die Gotter Selbst, vergebens. --Schiller |