From: Eeyore on


John Fields wrote:

> On Wed, 02 Aug 2006 17:25:24 +0100, Eeyore
> <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)REMOVETHIS.hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >bill.sloman(a)ieee.org wrote:
> >
> >> The "spelling error" was in fact a typo - I typed "yoiur" where I
> >> (obviously) intended "your". The mechanism is obvious enough - the "i"
> >> key lies between o and u on the keyboard - and the error is
> >> transparent enough that I didn't notice it at the time or when replying
> >> to Michael Terrell's post.
> >
> >Obvious enough to anyone with some functioning grey matter.
> >
> >
> >> That you find this to be the peak of comedy says something about the
> >> extent of the brain degeneration that you've already suffered.
> >
> >Jim had nothing better to do than chuckle over a similar typo of mine about a
> >day ago.
> >
> >
> >> I've checked the threading, and I seem to have got it right - your
> >> claim that I was "thinking that some else had posted the error" seems
> >> to be another manifestation of your failing understanding.
> >
> >Jim, Phat and Michael seem to have some issues with reality. Phat, in particular
> >is just a bit dense.
>
> ---
> Seems like something finally got through that thick skull of yours,
> at least with respect to bottom and in-line posting.
> Congratulations.

Eh ?

I've *always* been a bottom / in-line poster ! I occasionally take others to task
over it and also the lack of intelligent trimming.

Graham

From: Eeyore on


John Fields wrote:

> On Wed, 02 Aug 2006 18:06:53 +0100, Eeyore
> <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)REMOVETHIS.hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >It's pretty clear that a large percentage of the US think that the only answers
> >come out of the barrel of a gun.
>
> ---
> What's abundantly clear is that milquetoasts like you don't
> understand Teddy Roosevelt's "Speak softly and carry a big stick."
> and think that bluster, bravado, and braggadocio will save the day.

I understand it *perfectly* thank you. I'm entirely in favour of the UK maintaining
its nuclear deterrent for exactly that reason.


> I don't think there's a single country that hasn't drawn its borders
> in blood and maintained them by force of arms,

I see no reason to continue the bad practices of the past. I don't delude myself
that wars are simply going to go away but those who think they can resolve conflict
by engaging in war are likely to be disappointed

Graham

From: John Woodgate on
In message <1154540545.114278.233890(a)i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>, dated
Wed, 2 Aug 2006, bill.sloman(a)ieee.org writes
>Phat seems to be dense enough that he could have a uranium brain.
>Happily, there isn't enough brain for there to be any risk of a
>critical mass.

The bad news is it's not U, it's Pu. Or is that Poo?(;-)
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk
2006 is YMMVI- Your mileage may vary immensely.

John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK
From: John Fields on
On Wed, 02 Aug 2006 19:33:46 +0100, Eeyore
<rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)REMOVETHIS.hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>
>John Fields wrote:

>> ---
>> Seems like something finally got through that thick skull of yours,
>> at least with respect to bottom and in-line posting.
>> Congratulations.
>
>Eh ?
>
>I've *always* been a bottom / in-line poster ! I occasionally take others to task
>over it and also the lack of intelligent trimming.

---
Yes; you're right, of course. I apologize.

Somehow, I got you confused with "tapwater".


--
John Fields
Professional Circuit Designer
From: John Fields on
On Wed, 02 Aug 2006 19:38:21 +0100, Eeyore
<rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)REMOVETHIS.hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>
>John Fields wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 02 Aug 2006 18:06:53 +0100, Eeyore
>> <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)REMOVETHIS.hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >It's pretty clear that a large percentage of the US think that the only answers
>> >come out of the barrel of a gun.
>>
>> ---
>> What's abundantly clear is that milquetoasts like you don't
>> understand Teddy Roosevelt's "Speak softly and carry a big stick."
>> and think that bluster, bravado, and braggadocio will save the day.
>
>I understand it *perfectly* thank you. I'm entirely in favour of the UK maintaining
>its nuclear deterrent for exactly that reason.
>
>
>> I don't think there's a single country that hasn't drawn its borders
>> in blood and maintained them by force of arms,
>
>I see no reason to continue the bad practices of the past. I don't delude myself
>that wars are simply going to go away but those who think they can resolve conflict
>by engaging in war are likely to be disappointed

---
Yes, I agree, but just like when you get attacked by a rabid dog,
sometimes there's no choice but to put the dog down.

Ideally, before he gets close enough to bite.


--
John Fields
Professional Circuit Designer