New Book of Rules
in [Design]
|
From: Eeyore on 2 Aug 2006 12:25 bill.sloman(a)ieee.org wrote: > The "spelling error" was in fact a typo - I typed "yoiur" where I > (obviously) intended "your". The mechanism is obvious enough - the "i" > key lies between o and u on the keyboard - and the error is > transparent enough that I didn't notice it at the time or when replying > to Michael Terrell's post. Obvious enough to anyone with some functioning grey matter. > That you find this to be the peak of comedy says something about the > extent of the brain degeneration that you've already suffered. Jim had nothing better to do than chuckle over a similar typo of mine about a day ago. > I've checked the threading, and I seem to have got it right - your > claim that I was "thinking that some else had posted the error" seems > to be another manifestation of your failing understanding. Jim, Phat and Michael seem to have some issues with reality. Phat, in particular is just a bit dense. Graham
From: Dirk Bruere at NeoPax on 2 Aug 2006 12:47 John Woodgate wrote: > In message <4jbsjkF7autiU2(a)individual.net>, dated Wed, 2 Aug 2006, Dirk > Bruere at NeoPax <dirk.bruere(a)gmail.com> writes > >> and one nation scheduled for immediate invasion by Turkey. > > That would really improve Turkey's chance of joining the EU. Since few people want Turkey in the EU that's not a problem. I can just imagine a repeat of the E European migration here, but with Muslims - it's a horror. Dirk
From: krw on 2 Aug 2006 12:52 In article <qi9vc2llqf67p576igdcujd8s2ufueent6(a)4ax.com>, jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com says... > On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 04:25:54 +0100, Eeyore > <rabbitsfriendsandrelations(a)REMOVETHIS.hotmail.com> wrote: > > > >> Hamas uses civilians, schools, and UN posts as cover for rocket > >> launchers, so that directed Israeli counterattacks cause civilian > >> casualties. On the other hand, 100% of the essentially unguided Hamas > >> rocket attacks are directed at Israeli civilians; 100% are terror > >> attacks. Are the Hamas rockets war crimes? > > > >That's Gaza. Please don't confuse the issues. Lebanon is entirely another > >matter. Another country in fact. > > Oops, sorry. The Northern crazies are Hezbollah, and the Southern > lunatics are Hamas. Got to keep them straight. Don't bother. Both are fronts for Iran. -- Keith
From: Richard The Dreaded Libertarian on 2 Aug 2006 12:59 On Wed, 02 Aug 2006 03:00:04 +0000, Phat Bytestard wrote: > On Tue, 1 Aug 2006 22:07:31 -0400, krw <krw(a)att.bizzzz> Gave us: >>In article <pan.2006.08.02.22.12.07.64599(a)example.net>, null(a)example.net >>> On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 09:04:51 -0700, John Larkin wrote: >>> >>> > Pax Americana isn't a bad idea. It would save billions of lives and >>> > damage a bit of pride. >>> >>> First, of course, the Americans would have to swallow their false pride >>> and actually stop making war. >> >>BS, be worried when we stop *ending* war. > > > Well said. Gawd, you people are twisted. How exactly is it that you reduce war by adding war? Feh. Rich
From: Eeyore on 2 Aug 2006 13:06
Richard The Dreaded Libertarian wrote: > On Wed, 02 Aug 2006 03:00:04 +0000, Phat Bytestard wrote: > > On Tue, 1 Aug 2006 22:07:31 -0400, krw <krw(a)att.bizzzz> Gave us: > >>In article <pan.2006.08.02.22.12.07.64599(a)example.net>, null(a)example.net > >>> On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 09:04:51 -0700, John Larkin wrote: > >>> > >>> > Pax Americana isn't a bad idea. It would save billions of lives and > >>> > damage a bit of pride. > >>> > >>> First, of course, the Americans would have to swallow their false pride > >>> and actually stop making war. > >> > >>BS, be worried when we stop *ending* war. > > > > > > Well said. > > Gawd, you people are twisted. > > How exactly is it that you reduce war by adding war? It's pretty clear that a large percentage of the US think that the only answers come out of the barrel of a gun. Graham |