New HP 50 G ?
in [HP48]
|
Prev: HP48GX memory
Next: Linux emulators
From: ME on 22 May 2006 08:40 Of course , the UX180P is not an origami. "Veli-Pekka Nousiainen" <DROP_vpn(a)dlc.fi> wrote in message news:7R9cg.4391$_q5.2529(a)reader1.news.jippii.net... > ME wrote: >> The larger battery will provide 5 to 9 hours which is plenty for me >> when on the go. When at my desk the plug in AC adapter will be fine. >> I hope that the rumors of a flash drive are real. If this is true >> then battery life should be increased significantly. >> "Veli-Pekka Nousiainen" <DROP_vpn(a)dlc.fi> wrote in message >> news:pf%bg.4066$in7.1164(a)reader1.news.jippii.net... >>> ME wrote: >>>> I am sad to see that the last chance for my 49G (for gunk)+ calc's >>>> last chance is lost. I guess the Sony UX180P with Derive etc is my >>>> only future. >>>> http://www.sonystyle.com/is-bin/INTERSHOP.enfinity/eCS/Store/en/-/USD/SY_DisplayProductInformation-Start?ProductSKU=VGNUX180P&Dept=computers&CategoryName=cpu_VAIONotebookComputers_UX_Series >>> >>> I think that that is a true pocket PC >>> but >>> the batteries will not even last a full day >>> not to mention about a situation when you really stress it with >>> Derive > > There is a "global" (not for this device only) > 2?" 32GB Flash Drive coming soon... > Price unknown at the moment, more expensive anyway > Faster, shock-resistant, power-saving, etc... > Now THAT would make it a good choise > > I think I'll wait for the 2nd gen of Origamis > >
From: Veli-Pekka Nousiainen on 22 May 2006 08:52 ME wrote: > Of course , the UX180P is not an origami. Oh - thanks for the clarification!
From: Veli-Pekka Nousiainen on 22 May 2006 10:00 fbalzer wrote: > It's back, with some more information. One extra thing that I want is slightly more run-time speed eg. slow-mode as it is, but with 4 AAA you could have 90MHz or 105MHz "default" run mode Increasing it slightly with each evolutionary model one can always have a new faster model
From: Eric Smith on 22 May 2006 17:57 timwessman(a)gmail.com writes: > I would guess they are saying "improved display" to the 80x131 pixel > size. Considering how much work it took to get the larger 49g+ display > working correctly, I doubt another size increase is in order. > (Although if they split each pixel into 9 smaller pixels I wouldn't > complain. . . ;-) Possibly the work they did to expand it for the 49G+ has removed most or all of the internal hardcoding that made it difficult.
From: Jean-Yves Avenard on 23 May 2006 03:02
Eric Smith wrote: > Possibly the work they did to expand it for the 49G+ has removed most or all > of the internal hardcoding that made it difficult. The improvement they are talking about sound like what the rom update for the 49g+ brought. JY |