No USB ports on Ipad!
in [Mac Systems]
|
From: chrisv on 29 Mar 2010 10:44 nospam wrote: >> You can plug in USB2 cables as well. And get USB2 speeds because the >> additional USB3 wires are not present in USB2 cables > >which defeats the whole advantage of usb 3 Dumbshit. "Supporting the old hardware while allowing the new" is *exactly* the way an improved technology *should* be introduced. Good God, you are STUPID.
From: -hh on 29 Mar 2010 12:22 On Mar 29, 10:39 am, chrisv <chr...(a)nospam.invalid> wrote: > gl4...(a)yahoo.com wrote: > >Someone has to be the first to start moving away from the old standard. > > Gods, you people are STUPID. > > USB is not an "old standard" that needs to be "moved away from". Change the word "USB" to "RS232", or to "Parallel", or to "PS/2", or to "ADB", or to "DE-9", or ... In the meantime, have not USB 1 and 1.1 already been "moved away from"? Similarly, have there not been even a single new & faster standard announced since USB2's April 2000 publication? It is left up to the reader for if this question is referring to eSATA, or to Firewire, or the optics-based USB3 ... or Intel's LightPeak. > It's a standard in its *prime*, thus should be supported. YMMV. Frankly, while USB is good for some things, its not without shortcomings. For example, there was the historical trade-off to make it cheaper which resulted in relatively high overhead issues from its master/slave and asymmetric design, which steals roughly 1/3rd of its theoretical bandwidth, as well as a lack of real-time controls. There have been significantly higher performing products available at the general Retail level for more than a half decade which are clearly better suited for these tasks. -hh
From: Kelsey Bjarnason on 29 Mar 2010 14:49 chrisv wrote: > nospam wrote: > >>> You can plug in USB2 cables as well. And get USB2 speeds because the >>> additional USB3 wires are not present in USB2 cables >> >>which defeats the whole advantage of usb 3 > > Dumbshit. > > "Supporting the old hardware while allowing the new" is *exactly* the > way an improved technology *should* be introduced. > > Good God, you are STUPID. Between him and hh, they manage to make the Apple Cult IQ come out averaging negative. I'm now at the point I'm simply going to block any of the mac groups; these Apple Cult morons are making the Wintrolls we have look almost reasonable - and that's saying something. (Aside: there is a difference between an Apple user, even an Apple fan, and an Apple Cult member. These two are examples of the latter. I wouldn't be surprised if the human portion of the Apple user base tended to want to shoot these idiots.)
From: nospam on 29 Mar 2010 15:13 In article <9a9787-pr4.ln1(a)spanky.localhost.net>, Kelsey Bjarnason <kbjarnason(a)gmail.com> wrote: > I'm now at the point I'm simply going to block any of the mac groups; fantastic. it can't happen soon enough.
From: Fa-groon on 29 Mar 2010 15:33
On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 01:08:58 -0700, Peter Köhlmann wrote (in article <hopn6q$hvk$02$1(a)news.t-online.com>): > nospam wrote: > >> In article <o78587-opd.ln1(a)spanky.localhost.net>, Kelsey Bjarnason >> <kbjarnason(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hmm? You mean USB 3? Which is backwards compatible? And supports the >>> approximately 10 *billion* USB devices shipped thus far? >> >> usb 3 requires new cables. > > To use USB3 speeds, you forgot to mention. > You can plug in USB2 cables as well. And get USB2 speeds because the > additional USB3 wires are not present in USB2 cables > >> if apple did that, you'd be screaming. > > If apple did that, OxRetard would be over COLA all over again spouting > fanboi drivel how extremely well it can connect to the outside world. > > You know, about the same every cheap netbook does now, just better > > > Face it, cargo cult member, you have shown so far that you guys are just > extremely badly informed fanboiz, devoid of any grasp of reality. > > And you will spare no idiocy to defend apples imbecile decisions > You mean the way that yo spare no idiocy in defending that half-baked, cheap-assed, inadequate, OS with no software available for it called Linux? I see. |